PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
Journal
2014 | 1 | 3 | 204-208
Article title

Czynniki wpływające na komfort użytkowania soczewek kontaktowych

Content
Title variants
EN
Factors affecting the comfort of contact lenses
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
Keywords
Discipline
Publisher
Journal
Year
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
204-208
Physical description
Contributors
  • Dyrektor globalny zasobów profesjonalnych Alcon Vision Care
  • Dyrektor zasobów profesjonalnych na EURMEA Alcon Vision Care
References
  • 1. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002; 22(6): 516-527.
  • 2. Rumpakis J. New data on contact lens dropouts: An international perspective. Review of Optometry 2010 [online: http:// www.revoptom.com/content/d/contact_lenses_and_solutions/c/18929] (dostęp: 15.01.2010).
  • 3. Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, et al. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens. 2013; 39(1): 93-99.
  • 4. Chalmers RL, Hunt C, Hickson-Curran S, et al. Struggle with hydrogel CL wear increases with age in young adults. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32(3): 113-119.
  • 5. Sankaridurg P, Chen X, Naduvilath T, et al. Adverse Events during 2 Years of Daily Wear of Silicone Hydrogels in Children. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90(9): 961-969.
  • 6. Schafer J, Mitchell GL, Chalmers RL, et al. The stability of dryness symptoms after refitting with silicone hydrogel contact lenses over 3 years. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33(5): 247-252.
  • 7. Guillon M. Are silicone hydrogel contact lenses more comfortable than hydrogel contact lenses? Eye Contact Lens 2013; 39(1): 86-92.
  • 8. Papas E. Close to the edge: Oxygen at the lens periphery. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2013; Special Edition: 6-7.
  • 9. González-Méijome JM, López-Alemany A, Almeida JB, et al. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of the in vitro dehydration process of hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 83(2): 512-526.
  • 10. Morgan PB, Efron N. In vivo dehydration of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29(3): 173-176.
  • 11. Jones L, May C, Nazar L, et al. In vitro evaluation of the dehydration characteristics of silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens materials. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2002; 25(3): 147-156.
  • 12. Ramamoorthy P, Sinnott LT, Nichols JJ. Contact lens material characteristics associated with hydrogel lens dehydration. Opthal Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 160-166.
  • 13. Chalmers R., Long B, Dillehay S, et al. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85(8): 778-784.
  • 14. Zhao Z, Carnt NA, Aliwarga Y, et al. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86(3): 251-259.
  • 15. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: Structure, properties and behaviour. In: Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Sweeney D (ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 2004: 1-27.
  • 16. Panaser A, Tighe BJ. Function of lipids – their fate in contact lens wear: an interpretive review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35(3): 100-111.
  • 17. Young G, Chalmers R, Napier L, et al. Soft contact lens-related dryness with and without clinical signs. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89(8): 1125-1132.
  • 18. Dogru M, Ward SK, Wakamatsu T, et al. The effects of 2 week senofilcon-A silicone hydrogel contact lens daily wear on tear functions and ocular surface health status. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2011; 34(2): 77-82.
  • 19. Nash W, Gabriel M, Mowrey-Mckee M. A comparison of various silicone hydrogel lenses; lipid and protein deposition as a result of daily wear. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87(e-abstract: 105110).
  • 20. Kern J, Rappon J, Bauman E, et al. Assessment of the relationship between contact lens coefficient of friction and subject lens comfort. Invest Oph & Vis Sci 2013; 54(e-abstract: 494).
  • 21. Pult H, Purslow C, Berry M, et al. Clinical tests for successful contact lens wear: relationship and predictive potential. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85(10): E924-929.
  • 22. Eiden SB, Davis RL, Bergenske P. Prospective Study of Lotrafilcon B Lenses Comparing 2 Versus 4 Weeks of Wear for Objective and Lubjective Measures of Health, Comfort, and Vision. Eye & Contact Lens 2013; 39(4): 290-294.
Document Type
proceedings
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-8464657b-68bf-40e1-9bce-48e0a17e6a2f
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.