PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 36 | 138-152
Article title

Reinventing Democracy in a Postcolonial State: E-Democracy and the National Assembly in Nigeria

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This study adopts the concept of reinventing democracy to refocus attention on the theoretical framework of postcoloniality (in the humanities and social sciences). The study further highlights the eminent position of e-democracy in the current formations for moving contemporary society forward. In examining these issues, a case-study of the National Assembly in Nigeria has been made. We found that in this country, there seems to exist a sacrosanct brand of legislative institutionalism, which contradicts the current global revolution in information and communications technology (ICT). In the process, some level of immobility is introduced to critically desired service delivery in the country and attempts are made by the people’s representatives (of all people) to turn the nation into a colony of mere patriotic listeners. The study concludes that the postcolony must not convert to such a society of the underclass. A complementary concept of e-democracy is e-government. Further embedded in e-government are the dual components of e-readiness and e-participation. We found that this nation’s National Assembly appears to be deficient in e-readiness. The legislative body seems distrusful of e-participation. The study finally recommends that the rights of the citizens under e-democracy must be safeguarded by the central lawmakers, as it would guarantee the crucially expected reinvention of democracy, in such democracy-needy nation-states.
Year
Volume
36
Pages
138-152
Physical description
Contributors
  • Department of Public Administration and Local Government, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria, remiokeke@gmail.com
  • Department of Public Administration and Local Government, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria, eddy.izueke@unn.edu.ng
References
  • [1] Premium Times (2015). SERAP drags Nigerian Senate to UN over repressive media bill. http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/194393-serap-drags-nigerian-senate-to-un-over-repressive-media-bill.html.
  • [2] Federal Republic of Nigeria (n.d). The Legislative Process in the National Assembly. http://www.nassnig.org/page/the-legislative-process.
  • [3] Carl LeVan, A. (2015): Parallel institutionalism and the future of representation in Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary African Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2015.1099218.
  • [4] Bello, Ahmadu. 1962. My Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • [5] Osborne, D. (2007). Reinventing Government: what a difference a strategy makes. Paper presented at the 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government: Building Trust in Government, 26-29 June, Vienna.
  • [6] McClintock, A. (1992). The angel of progress: pitfalls of the term" post-colonialism". Social text, 31/32: 84-98.
  • [7] Shohat, E. (1992). Notes on the “Post-Colonial”. Social text, 31/32: 99-113.
  • [8] Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2013). Post-colonial studies: The key concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • [9] Loomba, A. (2015). Colonialism/postcolonialism. New York: Routledge.
  • [10] Idike, A.N.A. (2014). Democracy and the Electoral Process in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects of the E-Voting Option. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 133-141
  • [11] UN Economic and Social Council (2006). Definition of basic concepts and terminologies in governance and public administration (E/C.16/2006/4). New York: Committee of Experts on Public Administration.
  • [12] Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing E-Democracy Back in why it Matters for Future Research on E-Governance. Social science computer review, 21(4), 443-455.
  • [13] Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology Postnote, January 2009, Number 321. http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_offices/post/pubs2009.cfm.
  • [14] Coleman, S., & Norris, D. F. (2005). A new agenda for e-democracy. Oxford Internet Institute Forum Discussion Paper, No 4. Being a report based on the policy forum: A New Agenda for E-democracy: Lessons from Initiatives Round the World, held at Oxford University, 6-7 May.
  • [15] World Bank. Retrieved March 27, 2009, from http://go.worldbank.org/M1JHE0Z280
  • [16] Colesca, S. E. (2015). Understanding trust in e-government. Engineering Economics, 63(4). 7-15.
  • [17] Banjo, A. (2013). Leadership crisis in the parliament of Nigeria: The case of the senate in the Fourth Republic. Journal of African Studies and Development, 5(6), 135-144.
  • [18] Joshua, S., & Oni, S. (2014). The Nigerian House of Representatives and Corruption,(1999-2011). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 561-567.
  • [19] Ugwuanyi, S. (2015). 7th National Assembly: Low output despite huge cost to country.http://dailypost.ng/2015/06/03/7th-national-assembly-low-output-despite-huge-cost-to-country/.
  • [20] Tukur, S. (2015). In deceitful, laughable defence, Senate says 109 senators need N4.7billion cars for Committee shuttle. http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/195125-in-deceitful-laughable-defence-senate-says-109-senators-need-n4-7billion-cars-for-committee-shuttle.html.
  • [21] Spivak, G. (1985). Can the Subaltern Speak? Speculations on Widow-Sacrifice. Wedge, 7(8): 120-130.
  • [22] Green, J.E. (2010). The Eyes of the People: Democracy in the Age of Spectatorship. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • [23] Azmanova, A., & Mihai, M. (2015). (Eds). Reclaiming Democracy. New York: Routledge
  • [24] World Bank, Governance, Washington, D.C., 1993.
  • [25] Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington: Brookings Institutional Press.
  • [26] Homburg, V. (2008). Understanding E-Government: Information Systems in Public Administration. New York: Routledge.
  • [27] Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242-262.
  • [28] Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 75-90.
  • [29] Hilgers, D., & Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. The International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1), 67-88.
  • [30] West, D. M. (2005). Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • [31] Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354-369.
  • [32] Freeman, J., & Quirke, S. (2013). Understanding E-Democracy. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 5(2), 141-154
  • [33] Al-Rababah, B., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2010). E-government and gender digital divide: The case of Jordan. International Journal of Electronic Business Management (IJEBM), 8(1), 1-8.
  • [34] Spaiser, V. (2012). Empowerment or democratic divide? Internet-based political participation of young immigrants and young natives in Germany. Information Polity, 17, 115-127.
  • [35] Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2015). Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 453-463.
  • [36] Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • [37] Eggers, W. D. (2005). Government 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce Gridlock, and Enhance Democracy. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • [38] Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17(2), 275-297.
  • [39] Ganascia, J. (2015). Views and Examples on Hyper-Connectivity. In L. Floridi (ed): The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. London: Springer Open.
  • [40] Animasaun, D. (2013). Nigerian lawmakers are the highest paid in the world. http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/08/nigerian-lawmakers-are-the-highest-paid-in-the-world/.
  • [41] Ajie, H.A and Oyegun, G. (2015). Corruption and Economic Growth in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis 1996-2013. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(5), 224-243.
  • [42] Tukur, S. (2015). Court papers show how ex-NSA Dasuki allegedly shared N13.6bn arms money to cronies, politicians. http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/195173-court-papers-show-how-ex-nsa-dasuki-allegedly-shared-n13-6bn-arms-money-to-cronies-politicians.html.
  • [43] Anttiroiko, A. V. (2003). Building strong e-democracy: the role of technology in developing democracy for the information age. Communications of the ACM, 46(9), 121-128.
  • [44] Crozier, M. (2007). Recursive Governance: Contemporary Political Communication and Public Policy, Political Communication. 24(1), 1-18.
  • [45] Garrett, R. K., & Jensen, M. J. (2011). E-Democracy Writ Small: The impact of the Internet on citizen access to local elected officials. Information, Communication & Society, 14(2), 177-197.
  • [46] Laouris, Y. (2015). Reengineering and Reinventing both Democracy and the Concept of Life in the Digital Era. In L. Floridi (ed): The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. London: Springer Open.
  • [47] Soyinka, W. (2007). The Nigerian Nation against General Buhari. http://saharareporters.com/2007/01/14/crimes-buhari-wole-soyinka.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-8418670d-e96b-40d8-a109-0f378b8222a6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.