Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 126 | 261-275
Article title

Risk Analysis of Trans Papua Corridor Road Infrastructure Development in West Papua and Papua Province of Indonesia

Title variants
Languages of publication
Trans Papua corridor highway is now an important highway, predictable way Trans Papua will experience overcapacity in the future. To overcome this situation the trans-Papua road building is planned. The investment of highway construction will always be involved in risk with certain scale, it is necessary to do the risk analysis. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the risk, measuring of risk probability point and risk impact and risk test by performing simulations using @Risk For Excel software. This research was conducted using a survey method and interview with respondents. The survey was conducted in three phases, namely: beginning survey, preliminary survey and detailed survey. Based on research conducted identified four risk factors are financing risk, construction risk, equipment risk and force majeure. These four risks are identified in the medium risk category. The influence level of risk impact to the increase of construction investment budget plan trans-Papua roads as a whole amounted to 8.07% (IDR. 1,183 trillion equivalent to USD 82,684 million) with risk factor for 0,549 then classified as medium risk. While detaily 15% (IDR. 2,194 trillionequivalent to USD 153,346 million) by a factor of 0.685 then risk being classified as at risk. The most sensitive risk is the risk of Construction.
Physical description
  • Regional Innovation Program Study, Postgraduate Faculty, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia
  • Faculty of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia
  • [1] Abdul-Rahman, H.; Wang, C.; Lee, Y. L. 2013. Design and pilot run of fuzzy synthetic model (FSM) for risk evaluation in civil engineering, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(2): 217-238.
  • [2] Al-Kharashi, A.; Skitmore, M. 2009. Causes of delays in Saudi Arabian public sector construction projects, Construction Management and Economics 27(1): 3-23.
  • [3] Assaf, S. A.; Al-Hejji, S. 2006. Causes of delay in large construction projects’, International Journal of Project Management 24(4): 349-357.
  • [4] Bon-Gang, H.; Xianbo, Z.; Ping, T. L. 2014. Risk management in small construction projects in Singapore: status, barriers and impact, International Journal of Project Management 32(1): 116-124.
  • [5] Rizal A, Suryana AAH, Herawati H, Lantun PD, Izza MA, Regional Perspective To Build Competitiveness For Indonesian Fishery Sector In The Global And Autonomy Regime. Int. J. Agric. Env. Res. Vol 3 (6) (2017) 4368-4388
  • [6] Rizal A & Nurruhwati I. New Methodological Approaches for Change in Traditional Sectors: The Case of the West Java Fisheries Socio Economic System. World News of Natural Sciences 22 (2019) 41-51
  • [7] Rizal A. Science and policy in the coastal zone management. World News of Natural Sciences 21 (2018) 1-8
  • [8] Syaifuddin & Rizal A. The Influence of Corporate Communication Strategy and Customer Value Creation Toward Creation of Reputation (Case Study at Len-Indonesian State Owned Company). World Scientific News 105 (2018) 62-73
  • [9] Hameed, A.; Woo, S. 2007. Risk importance and allocation in Pakistan construction industry: a contractor’s perspective, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 11(2): 73-80.
  • [10] Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Chen, I.-S.; Rezaeiniya, N.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2012. A hybrid MCDM model encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(3): 529-543.
  • [11] Jaskowski, P.; Sobotka, A. 2012. Using soft precedence relations for reduction of the construction project duration, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(2): 262-279.
  • [12] Kapliński, O. 2013. The utility theory in maintenance and repair strategy, Procedia Engineering 54: 604–614. Kapliński, O. 2008. Usefulness and credibility of scoring methods in construction industry, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(1): 21-28.
  • [13] Kaplinski, O. 2009a. Information technology in the development of the Polish construction industry, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(3): 437-452.
  • [14] Kapliński, O. 2009b. Problems of the information technologies use in Polish construction sector: state of the art, Archives of Civil Engineering 55(2): 173–197.
  • [15] Ke, Y.; Wang, S.; Chan, A. P. C. 2012. Risk management practice in China’s Public-Private Partnership projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(5): 675-684.
  • [16] Li, H. X.; Al-Hussein, M.; Lei, Z.; Ajweh, Z. 2013. Risk identification and assessment of modular construction utilizing fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and simulation, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 40(12): 1184-1195.
  • [17] Ling, F. Y. Y.; Ning, Y.; Ke, Y.; Kumaraswamy, M. M. 2013. Modeling relational transaction and relationship quality among team members in public projects in Hong Kong, Automation in Construction 36: 16-24.
  • [18] López-Alonso, M.; Ibarrondo-Dávila, M. P.; Rubio-Gámez, M. C.; Munoz, T. G. 2013. The impact of health and safety investment on construction company costs, Safety Science 60: 151-159.
  • [19] Markmann, C.; Darkow, I.-L.; von der Gracht, H. 2013. A delphi-based risk analysis – identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(9): 1815-1833.
  • [20] Paslawski, J. 2013. Hybrid flexible approach for Six Sigma implementation in constructional SME, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(5): 718-727.
  • [21] Smeureanu, I.; Ruxanda, G.; Diosteanu, A.; Delcea, C.; Cotfas, L. A. 2012. Intelligent agents and risk based model for supply chain management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(3): 452-469.
  • [22] T. Raz, E. Michael, Use and benefits of tools for project risk management, International Journal of Project Management 19 (2001) 9-17
  • [23] V. Rutkauskas, A. Gineviôius, Integrated management of marketing risk and efficiency, Jounal of Business Economics and Management 12 (1) (2011) 5-23
  • [24] D. Skorupka, Identification and initial risk assessment of construction projects in Poland, Journal of Management in Engineering, 2008, 24(3), pp. 120-127
  • [25] Dziadosz, The influence of solutions adopted at the stage of planning the building investment on the accuracy of cost estimation, Procedia Engineering 54 (2013) 625-635
  • [26] Z. Turskis, M. Gajzler, A. Dziadosz, Reliability, Risk Management and contingency of construction processes and projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(2) (2012) 290-298
  • [27] J. H. M. Tah, V. Carr, A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic, Construction Management and Economics, (18) (2000) 491-500
  • [28] E.K. Zavadskas, L. Ustinovichius, A. Stasiulionis, Multicriteria valuation of commercial construction projects for investment purposes, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 10 (2) (2004) 151-166
  • [29] E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis.,J. Tamošaitiene, J., Risk assessment of construction projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 (1) (2010) 33-46
  • [30] G. Zhang, P.X.W. Zou, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Risk Assessment Approach for Joint Venture Construction Projects in China, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133 (10) (2007) 771-779
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.