PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2021 | 157 | 140-153
Article title

Quality control test of conventional X-Ray systems in Delta State, South-South, Nigeria

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) programmes of imaging equipment are key ingredients of a quality system. This study is aimed at measuring X-Ray machine parameters and comparing them with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) report No. 74. Also, this study made comparison with similar articles locally and internationally. The study was conducted in 12 X-Ray unit (A-L) located in Delta State. A MagicMax Universal Basic Unit was used alongside an XR Multidetector (silicon photodiode) to measure dose, dose rate, practical peak voltage (PPV), exposure time, current in milliampere (mA) and quantity (Q) in milliampere seconds (mAs). The XR Multidetector was positioned at 100 cm from the focus to image distance (FID) to make most measurements. Six (6) X-Ray units were above 20 years, accounting for 50% of the total X-Ray units used. 30% of X-Ray units > 20 years failed the QC test, which was 2.3 times higher than X-Ray units < 10 and 10-20 years respectively. On the average, 55% pass mark was achieved in the 12 X-Ray units across the state, while 26.11% of the test could not be done due to bad knobs and other challenges. Two (2) X-Ray units with an average age of 3 years, passed all the test. The study showed that many of the X-Ray units were old and certain machine parameters could not be assessed. The study also reveal that most X-Ray specifications manual were either misplaced or missing. Continuing QC programme is highly recommended in the studied areas.
Discipline
Year
Volume
157
Pages
140-153
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Delta State Polytechnic, Ogwashi-Uku, Delta State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiography and Radiological Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Anambra, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology, Medical Physics Unit, Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria
References
  • [1] Toppenberg MD, Christiansen TEM, Rasmussen F, Nielsen CP, Damsgaard EM. Mobile X-ray outside the hospital: a scoping review. BMC Health. Serv. Res. 20 (2020) 767
  • [2] Howell JD. Early clinical use of the X-ray. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 127(2016) 341-349
  • [3] Chen H, Rogalski MM, Anker JN. Advances in functional X-ray imaging techniques and contrast agents. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14(39) (2012) 13469-13486
  • [4] Park MY, Jung SE. Patient Dose Management: Focus on Practical Actions. J Korean Med Sci. 31(2016) Suppl 1(Suppl 1) S45-S54
  • [5] Rasuli B, Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A, Ghorbani M, Juybari RT, Naserpour M. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 17(1) (2016) 374-386
  • [6] Akpochafor MO, Omojola AD, Adeneye SO, Aweda MA, Ajayi HB. Determination of reference dose levels among selected X-ray centers in Lagos State, South-West Nigeria. J Clin Sci 13 (2016) 167-72
  • [7] Nigerian Nuclear Regulatory Authority (NNRA). Nigerian Safety and Radiation Protection Act (1995 No. 19): Nigerian Radiation Safety in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Regulations, (2006) B661-B692
  • [8] Nigerian Nuclear Regulatory Authority (NNRA). Nigeria Basic Ionizing Radiation Regulation. (2003) B165-B247.
  • [9] Mohan C. Quality program in radiology: Persue or perish. Indian J Radiol Imaging 27(1) (2017) 1-3
  • [10] Jones AK, Heintz P, Geiser W, Goldman L, Jerjian K, Martin M et al. Ongoing quality control in digital radiography. Med Phys. 42(11) (2015) 6659-6669
  • [11] Sharma R, Sharma SD. A quality control programme for medical X-ray films in India. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 148(1) (2012) 51-57
  • [12] European Commission, European Commission. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. EUR 16260 EN, Luxembourg. (1996).
  • [13] General X-ray QA and QC Guideline, Version 1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. (2013).
  • [14] International Atomic Energy Agency. Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series No. 457, IAEA, Vienna. (2007).
  • [15] American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Quality control in diagnostic radiology. AAPM Report No. 74. (2002)
  • [16] Khoshbin Khoshnazar A, Hejazi P, Mokhtarian M, Nooshi S. Quality control of radiography equipment in Golestan Province of Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics 10(1) (2013) 37-44
  • [17] Mehrdad G, Fataneh N, Vahid K. The evaluation of conventional X‑ray exposure parameters including tube voltage and exposure time in private and governmental hospitals of Lorestan Province, Iran. Iran J Med Phys. 2 (2015) 85‑92
  • [18] Akpochafor MO, Omojola AD, Soyebi KO, Adeneye SO, Aweda MA, Ajayi HB. Assessment of peak kilovoltage accuracy in ten selected X-ray centers in Lagos metropolis, South-Western Nigeria: A quality control test to determine energy output accuracy of an X-ray generator. J Health Res Rev. 3 (2016) 60-65
  • [19] Asadinezhad M, Toossi MTB, Ebrahiminia A, Giahi M. Quality Control Assessment of Conventional Radiology Devices in Iran. Iran J Med Phys. 14(1) (2017) 1-7
  • [20] Gholamhosseinian-Najjar H, Bahreyni-Toosi MT, Zare MH, Sadeghi HR, Sadoughi HR. Quality control status of radiology centers of hospitals associated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Iranian J Med Phy. 11(1) (2014) 182-7
  • [21] Jomehzadeh Z, Jomehzadeh A, Tavakoli MB. Quality Control Assessment of Radiology Devices in Kerman Province, Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics 3(1) (2016) 25-35
  • [22] Rasuli B, Pashazadeh AM, Tahmasebi Birgani MJ, Ghorbani M, Naserpour M, Fatahi-Asl J. quality control of conventional radiology devices in selected hospitals of Khuzestan province, Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics 12(2) (2015) 101-108
  • [23] Akpochafor MO, Adeneye SO, Akpolile FD, Omojola AD, Aweda MA. Evaluation of kilovoltage failure in conventional X-ray machines among selected X-ray Centers in Jos North Local government area of Plateau State, Nigeria. Nig Qt J Hosp Med. 27(2) (2017) 768-775
  • [24] Esmaeili, S. Measurement of patient skin dose of common techniques in diagnostic radiology in 15 radiology centers and quality control of those units in Mashhad, in Medical Physics. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (2006).
  • [25] Saghatchia F, Saloutib M, Bahreinic MT. QC of X ray machines in the hospitals of the Medical Sciences University of Zanjan. QANTRM, Vienna, 13–15 November. IAEA-CN-146/095 (2006)
  • [26] Kareem AA, Hulugalle SN, Al-Hamadani HK. A Quality Control Test for General X-Ray Machine. World Scientific News 90 (2017) 11-30
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-7f56fb97-802d-456e-94a4-c912304fb0bc
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.