PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2018 | 114 | 68-83
Article title

The ratio of tuna white meat surimi and red meat surimi in the making of fish burger based on the preference level

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This research aims to determine the ratio percentage of white meat surimi and red meat surimi of tuna in the making of fish burger in the most preferred by the panelists. The method used for this research in experimental with 5 treatments, which are the usage of 100% content of white meat surimi and the combination of white meat surimi and red meat surimi with the percentage of 90%, 10%, 80%, 20%, 70%, 30%, 60%, 40% based on the weight of white and red surimi meat, involving up to 20 semi-trained panelists as rehearsal. The observed parameters are the yield calculation percentage of white and red tuna fillet, surimi’s yield and fish burger’s yield, hedonic test (preference level) based on organoleptic characteristic covering the appearance, aroma, texture and taste of tuna fish burger along with chemical test (protein value, fat value and water level) to fish burger. According to the result to the fish burger’s level of preference it can be summarized that the comparison of tuna’s white meat surimi and red meat surimi for every treatments are liked by the panelists, however the treatment of 80% white meat surimi and 20% red meat surimi tuna is the most preferred treatment by panelists with the median characteristic value of appearance, aroma, and texture of 7 (liked) and taste 9 (very liked). The amount of the protein value is 13.99%, fat value is 2.36%, and water value is 31.28%
Contributors
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
author
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
author
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
author
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
References
  • [1] Arnthorsdottir, M.G., Arason, S., and Margeirsson, B. 2008. Combined Blast and Contact Cooling – Effects on Physicochemical Characteristics of Fresh Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) Fillets. Reykjavik: Matis.
  • [2] Association of Official Analytical Chemist [AOAC].1995. Official Methods of Analysis of The Association of Analytical Chemist. Washington D.C.
  • [3] Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 1972. Ten-State Nutrition Survey 1968-1970. Journal Biochemical, Vol. IV, Washington DC.
  • [4] Dewi, I.A. dan Imam, S. 2007. Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Analyze Factors that Determine the Quality of Packaged Fishballs. Journal of Agriculture Technology 8 (1): 19-25.
  • [5] Ejaz M. A. 2008. Studies on the Development of Fish Burger From Pangus (Pangasius Sutchi Catfish. MS Thesis. Department of Fisheries Technology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
  • [6] Emmanuelle, S.A., Yolande, A.A., Rose, K.N., Henri, B. 2012. Histamine Contents in Tuna Loins (Thunnus sp.) Produced in Cote d’Ivoire and its Relation with Bacterial Load. International Journal of Science and Research 3(6): 2347-2351.
  • [7] Forrest, J.C.M, Aberle E.D, Judge M.D, Merrel M.A. 1975. Principle of Meat Science. Will. Freeman and Company. San Franscisco.
  • [8] Hafiluddin. 2011. Proximate Characteristics and Chemical Compounds of White Meat and Red Meat of Tuna (Euthynnus affinis). Marine Journal, 4 (1), 1-10.
  • [9] Hall, G. M. and N.H. Ahmad. 1992. Surimi and Fish Mince Product. W. H. In G. M Hall (Eds) Fish Processing Technology. New York.
  • [10] Haq, M., Dutta, P.L., Sultana, N., Rahman, A. 2013. Production and Quality Assessment of Fish Burger from the Grass Carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Cuvier and Valenciennes 1844). Journal of Fisheries. Vol. 1, 42-47.
  • [11] Kantun, W., Mallawa A., Rapi N.L. 2014. Structure Size and Number of Catches According from Yellow fin (Thunnus Albacares) to Time and Depth in Makassar Strait. Saintek Fisheries Journal 9 (2): 39-48.
  • [12] Lee, C.M., 1984. Surimi Process Technology. Food Technol. Champaign 38, 69-80.
  • [13] Lehninger AL. 1990. Principles of Biochemistry. Worth Publishers, Inc., New York.
  • [14] Negroni, M., A. Dagustina, and A. Arnoldi. 2001. Effects of Olive Oil, Canola and Sunflower Oils on the Formulation of Volatiles from the Maillard Reaction of Lysinewith Xylose and Glucose. Journal Agric Food Chem 49, 439-445.
  • [15] Nishioka, M., Tanioka,Y., Miyamoto, E., Enomoto, T. And Watanabe, F. 2007. TLC analysis of acorrinoid compound from dark muscle of the yellow fin tuna (Thunnus albacares). Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 3: 2245-2252.
  • [16] Persatuan Ahli Gizi Indonesia. 2009. Tabel Komposisi Pangan Indonesia. Jakarta.
  • [17] Perkins, C. 1992. Seafood Handbook, the Andvanced, Selling the Benefit: Taste, Nutrition and Safety. Rockland. Maine. USA: 571-572.
  • [18] Poernomo, D., Suseno, S.H., Subekti, B.P. 2013. Physicochemical Characteristics of Fish Ball from Minced Sailfish (Istiophorus Orientalis). Indonesian Fisheries Processing Journal Vol. (16), No. 1: 58-68.
  • [19] Price dan Schweigert. 1971. The Science of Meat and Meat Product. Willey Published. San Fransisco.
  • [20] Riesnawaty, C.J. 2007. Utilization of Dumbo Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Surimi in The Making of Fish Burgers. Indonesian Fisheries Processing Journal. Bogor Agricultural University.
  • [21] Singh, D. 2013. A Study on the Use of Non-Parametric Tests for Experimentation with Cluster Analysis. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research Vol. 3 (6), p 64-72.
  • [22] Soekarto,S.T. 1990. Fundamentals of Supervision and Standardization of Food Quality. IPB. Bogor.
  • [23] Suzuki, T. 1981. Fish Krill Protein Procesing Technology. Applied Science Publisher, Ltd. London.
  • [24] Tahergorabi, R. Beamer SK, Matak KE, Jacynski J. 2012. Salt Substitution in Surimi Seafood and its Effects on Instrumental Quality Attributes. Food Science and Technology 48, 175-181.
  • [25] Vural H. 2003. Effect of Replacing Beef Fat and Tail Fat with Interesterified Plant Oil on Quality Characteristic of Turkish Semi-dry Fermented Sausages. Eur. Journal Food Res. Technol. Vol. 217, 100-110.
  • [26] Wibowo, P. S. D. Indrasari and Jumali. 2004. Research of Consumer Preference on Characteristic of Rice Quality, Research Report. Indonesian Rice Research Institute, Sukamandi.
  • [27] Winarno, F. G. 1991. Food Chemistry and Nutrition. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
  • [28] Winarno, F. G. 1997. Food Chemistry and Nutrition. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
  • [29] Winarno, F. G. 2008. Food Chemistry and Nutrition. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-6cb0cb1e-8d79-4301-91d6-98e65f41d02b
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.