PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 23 | 34-42
Article title

Length-Weight Relationship and Catch Size of Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) Landed in Benoa, Bali, Indonesia

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The research was conducted at the Tuna Fisheries Research Station, Denpasar, Bali, in July 2018 (3 weeks duration). There were several types of high-value fish incorporated into this research: tuna, skipjack, shrimp, cob, mackerel, snapper, squid, reef fish (grouper, baronang, lobster / barong shrimp) and ornamental fish. Seaweed processing was also assessed. Benoa Fishing Port is one of the tuna landing base bases in Indonesia. It is the main port in Bali Province and ranks beside Muara Baru (Jakarta), Pelabuhan Ratu (West Java) and Cilacap (Central Java). This research aim to identified length-weight relationship, and proportion of proper catch size of bigeye tuna. Herein, bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) was identified visually and then assessed. The first identifier is the large size of the eye. The growth pattern of big eye tuna (Thunnus obesus) landed in Benoa Fishing Portis is isometric, where the length increase is equal to weight gain (isometric positive). The length distribution of big eye tuna was in range of 81-170 cm FL (334 fishes are obtained), and the distribution of weights varied in size from 11-95 kg, with the most common catch size being in the range of 16-20 kg (95 fishes). Of note, 60% of the fish had not reached the proper catch size.
Year
Volume
23
Pages
34-42
Physical description
Contributors
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Tuna Fisheries Research Station, Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Affair, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
author
  • Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
References
  • [1] Arrizabalaga, H., Dufour, F., Kell, L., Merino, G., Ibaibarriaga, L., Chust, G., Irigoien, X., Santiago, J., Murua, H., Fraile, I. and Chifflet, M., 2015. Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 113, pp. 102-112.
  • [2] Blackwell, B.G., Brown, M.L & Willis, D.W. 2000. Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in fisheries assessment and management. Reviews in Fisheries Science 8: 1-44.
  • [3] Bojolly, D., Doyen, P., Le Fur, B., Christaki, U., Verrez-Bagnis, V. and Grard, T., 2017. Development of a qPCR Method for the Identification and Quantification of Two Closely Related Tuna Species Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) and Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares), in Canned Tuna. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 65(4), pp. 913-920.
  • [4] Hartaty, H., & Sulistyaningsih R. K. 2014. Estimation of Population Parameter and Exploitation Rate of Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) Landed at Benoa, Bali. J. Lit. Perikan. Ind 20(2): 97-103.
  • [5] Jatmiko, I., Setyadji, B., & Novianto, D. 2014. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Big Eye Tuna (Thunnus Obesus) in the Eastern Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research Journal Ind. 20(3): 137-142.
  • [6] Krissunari, D., Hariati, T. 1994. Estimation of the First Time Ripe Gonad Some Small Pelagic Fish in the Northern Waters of Rembang. Fisheries Research Journal 85: 48-53.
  • [7] Lehodey, P., Senina, I., Wibawa, T.A., Titaud, O., Calmettes, B., Conchon, A., Tranchant, B. and Gaspar, P., 2018. Operational modelling of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) spatial dynamics in the Indonesian region. Marine pollution bulletin 131:19-32.
  • [8] Nugraha, B., & Hufiadi. 2013. Technical Efficiency of Tuna Longline Fisheries in Benoa (Case Study of PT. Perikanan Nusantara). Fisheries Research Journal Ind 19(1): 25-30.
  • [9] Oscoz, J., F. Campos, & M. C. Escala. 2005. Weight and length relationships of some fish species of the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21: 73-74.
  • [10] Restiangsih, Y. H., Noegroho, T., & Wagiyo, K. 2016. Some Aspects of Biology of Mackerel Fish Board (Scomberomorus Guttatus) in Cilacapdan Surrounding Waters. BAWAL 8(3): 191-198.
  • [11] Arsa Dipanoto, Mega L. Syamsuddin, Zuzy Anna, Izza Mahdiana A., The estimation of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus, (Lowe, 1839)) fishing season in the East Indies Ocean which is disembarked in Benoa Port, Bali. Word Scientific News 115 (2019) 1-14
  • [12] Richter, T.J. 2007. Development and evaluation of standard weight equations for bridgelip sucker and largescale sucker. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 27: 936-939
  • [13] Schaefer, K., Fuller, D., Hampton, J., Caillot, S., Leroy, B. and Itano, D., 2015. Movements, dispersion, and mixing of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) tagged and released in the equatorial Central Pacific Ocean, with conventional and archival tags. Fisheries research, 161, pp. 336-355.
  • [14] Wainwright, D.K., Ingersoll, S. and Lauder, G.V., 2018. Scale diversity in bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus): Fat‐filled trabecular scales made of cellular bone. Journal of morphology, 279(6), pp. 828-840.
  • [15] Zhu, G.P., X.J. Dai, L.M. Song & L.X. Xu. 2011. Size at Sexual Maturity of Bigeye Tuna Thunnus obesus (Perciformes: Scombridae) in the Tropical Waters: a Comparative Analysis. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 11: 149-156.
  • [16] Williams, A.J., Allain, V., Nicol, S.J., Evans, K.J., Hoyle, S.D., Dupoux, C., Vourey, E. and Dubosc, J., 2015. Vertical behavior and diet of albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga) vary with latitude in the South Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 113, pp. 154-169
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-6a7386c7-d339-4e35-b438-c573a1ac495f
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.