PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
Journal
2016 | 3 | 4 | 262-268
Article title

Procedury laserowe w korekcji starczowzroczności

Content
Title variants
EN
Laser modalities to treat presbyopia
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The paper reports an overview of the currently available and registered laser platforms to treat presbyopia. A close attention has been paid to monovision as the most popular treatment method across the world. Postoperative limitations and preoperative criteria, including ocular dominance, form part of this report. Differences between the regular monovision and the novel micromonovision protocols (Laser Blended Vision) have been emphasised. Various multifocal ablation protocols have been described with their limitations and possible side effects. As with every treatment modality, safety and efficacy play important roles, and the article presents the available data concerning both of the parameters.
PL
W artykule dokonano przeglądu zarejestrowanych platform używanych w leczeniu starczowzroczności. Szczególną uwagę poświęcono monowizji, będącej obecnie najbardziej popularną laserową metodą korekcji tej dolegliwości. Przedstawiono jej ograniczenia i kryteria kwalifikacji pacjentów, zwracając uwagę na rolę dominacji ocznej. Podkreślono różnicę między tradycyjną monowizją a zabiegami mikromonowizji (LBV, laser blended vision). Opisano także aktualne protokoły ablacji wieloogniskowej i ich ograniczenia. Przedstawiono wyniki i profil bezpieczeństwa laserowych metod korekcji starczowzroczności.
Discipline
Publisher

Journal
Year
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
262-268
Physical description
Contributors
  • Klinika Okulistyczna Optegra w Warszawie; Klinika Okulistyki, Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny w Warszawie
References
  • 1. Kleinstein RN. Epidemiology of presbyopia. W: Stark L, Obrecht G (ed). Presbyopia: recent research and reviews from the third international symposium. Professional Press Books, New York 1987: 12-18.
  • 2. Croft MA, Glasser A, Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001; 41(2): 33-46.
  • 3. WHO. Vision 2020. Global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness. Fact Sheet No 1213. WHO, Geneva 2000.
  • 4. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZN, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med 1990; 10: 463-468.
  • 5. Seiler T, Bende T, Wollensak J, Trokel SL. Excimer laser keratectomy for correction of astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 117-124.
  • 6. Moreira H, Garbus JJ, Fasano A, et al. Multifocal corneal topographic changes with excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 994-999.
  • 7. Vinciguerra P, Nizzola GM, Bailo G, et al. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for presbyopia: 24-month follow-up in three eyes. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 31-37.
  • 8. Goldberg DB. Comparison of myopes and hyperopes after laser in situ keratomileusis monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1695-1701.
  • 9. Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular supperession of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 723-730.
  • 10. Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, et al. Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30(4): 769-774.
  • 11. Miranda D, Krueger RR. Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg 2004; 20: 325-328.
  • 12. Sippel KC, Jain S, Azar DT. Monovision achieved with excimer laser refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001; 41(2): 91-101.
  • 13. Braun EH, Lee J, Steinert RF. Monovision in LASIK. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1196-1202.
  • 14. Zhang F, Sugar A, Arbisser L, et al. Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision: Patient satisfaction, visual function, and spectacle independence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 1845-1854.
  • 15. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for myopic astigmatism and presbyopia using nonlinear aspheric micro-monovision with the carl zeiss meditec MEL 80 Platform. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 23-37.
  • 16. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for the correction of presbyopia in emmetropic patients using aspheric ablation profiles and a micro-monovision protocol with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL80 and VisuMax. J Refract Surg 2012; 28(8): 531-541.
  • 17. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Aspheric ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatment using the MEL80 and CRS Master Laser Blended Vision module. J Emmetropia 2011; 2(3): 161-175.
  • 18. Reinstein DZ, Morral M, Gobbe M, Archer TJ. Accuracy of refractive outcomes in myopic and hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: Manifest versus aberrometric refraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38(11): 1989-1995.
  • 19. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for hyperopic astigmatism and presbyopia using non-linear aspheric micro-monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 platform. J Refract Surg 2009; 25(1): 37-58.
  • 20. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for presbyopia correction in emmetropic patients using non-linear aspheric micro- -monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 platform. J Refract Surg 2012; 28(8): 531-541.
  • 21. Jung SW, Kim MJ, Park SH, Joo CK. Multifocal corneal ablation for hyperopic presbyopes. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 903-910.
  • 22. Iribarne Y, Juarez E, Orbegoz J. Bi-aspheric ablation profile for presbyopic hyperopic corneal treatments using AMARIS with PresbyMAX module: Multicentric Study in Spain. J Emmetropia 2012; 3: 5-16.
  • 23. Uthoff D, Peolzl M, Hepper D, Holland D. A new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012; 250: 1649-1661.
  • 24. Alio JL, Chaubard JJ, Caliz A, et al. Correction of presbyopia by Technovision central multifocal LASIK (presby-LASIK). J Refract Surg 2006; 22: 453-460.
  • 25. Uy E, Go R. Pseudoaccommodative Cornea Treatment Using the NIDEK EC-5000 CXIII Excimer Laser in Myopic and Hyperopic Presbyopes. J Refract Surg 2009; 25(supl. 1): S148-S155.
  • 26. Ryan A, O’Keefe M. Corneal approach to hyperopic presbyopia treatment: Six-month outcomes of a new multifocal excimer laser in situ keratomileusis procedure. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39: 1226-1233.
  • 27. Saib N, Abrieu-Lacaille M, Berguiga M, et al. Central PresbyLASIK for Hyperopia and Presbyopia Using Micro-monovision With the Technolas 217P Platform and SUPRACOR Algorithm. J Refract Surg 2015; 31(8): 540-546.
  • 28. Holzer MP, Mannsfeld A, Ehmer A, Auffarth GU. Early outcomes of INTRACOR femtosecond laser treatment for presbyopia. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 855-861.
  • 29. Menassa N, Fitting A, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP. Visual outcomes and corneal changes after intrastromal femtosecond laser correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 765-773.
  • 30. Goldberg DB. Computer-animated model of accommodation and presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 437-445.
  • 31. Yoo A, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Hydrogel Inlay for Presbyopia: Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes. J Refract Surg 2015; 31(7): 454-460.
  • 32. Whitman J, Hovanesian J, Steinert RF, et al. Through-focus performance with a corneal shape-changing inlay: One-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 965-971.
  • 33. Jacobs S. Presbyopic Allogenic Refractive Lenticule (PEARL). [Materiał konferencyjny] Innovative Session ESCRS, Copenhagen 10–14.09.2016.
  • 34. Mrochen M. Allogenic corneal onlays and inlays. [Materiał konferencyjny] Free Paper Session ESCRS, Copenhagen 10–14.09.2016.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-65accd8e-e247-40a5-a4c3-f6842810d483
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.