Effects of eight weeks of TRX versus traditional resistance training on physical fitness factors and extremities perimeter of non-athlete underweight females
Languages of publication
Introduction: New form of suspension training (TRX) has been introduced which has the ability to develop physical fitness factors. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of eight weeks of resistance training by traditional and TRX methods on physical fitness f actors and extremities perimeter of non -athlete underweight girls. Material and methods: Thirty non -athlete underweight female students qualified with an average age of 23±1.64 years, weight of 43.53±0.28 kg, height of 162.66±6.6 cm and BMI of 16.31±0.2 kg /m 2 were selected and randomly assigned into three groups of 10 subjects (traditional, TRX and control) . Participants performed training of 3 sessions per week for eight weeks. Before and after the period of training, physical fitness variables including m uscular strength and endurance, flexibility, thigh and arm circumferences were measured. Results: The results showed that both forms of training had a significant effect on muscular strength and endurance. There was no significant difference in flexibilit y and thigh and arm circumferences. Conclusion: It can be concluded, that the traditional and TRX training have created almost same improvements in physical fitness factors, so TRX training can be considered an efficient choice to do alongside traditional training or as its alternative in order to earn desired training achievements. It is noteworthy that when training goal is to enhance muscular strength and endurance especially in upper -body, TRX training appears to be accompanied by greater gains compared to traditional resistance training.
- 1. Fleck SJ, Kraemer W. Designing Resistance Training Programs, 4E. Human Kinetics, 2014.
- 2. Saylor SM. Efficacy of whole-body suspension training on enhancing functional movement abilities following a supervised or home-based 8-week training program 2016 (Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University).
- 3. Anderson K, Behm DG. The impact of instability resistance training on balance and stability, Sports Medicine 2005; 35(1): 43-53.
- 4. Mühlberg W, Sieber C. Sarcopenia and frailty in geriatric patients: implications for training and prevention, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 2004; 37(1): 2 -8.
- 5. Dudgeon W D, Herron JM, Aartun JA et al. Physiologic and metabolic effects of a suspensión training workout, International Journal of Sports Science 2015; 5(2): 65 -72. doi: 10.5923/j.sports.20150502.04
- 6. Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM et al. Canadian Society fo r Exercise Physiology position stand: The use of instability to train the core in athletic and nonathletic conditioning, Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 2010; 35(1): 109- 112. doi: 10.1139/H09- 128
- 7. Weiss T, Kreitinger J, Wilde H et al. Effect o f functional resistance training on muscular fitness outcomes in young adults, Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness 2010; 8(2): 113- 122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1728- 869X(10)60017- 2
- 8. Snarr RL, Esco MR. Comparison of electromyographic activity when performing an inverted row with and without a suspension device, Age (yrs) 2013; 26(4.2): 22- 3.
- 9. Gentil P, Oliveira E, Bottaro M. Time under tension and blood lactate response during four different resistance training methods, Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science 2006; 25(5): 339- 344.
- 10. Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Raastad T. Ischemic strength training: a low -load alternative to heavy resistance exercise? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 2008; 18(4): 401 -416.
- 11. Dannelly BD, Otey SC, Croy T et al. The effectiveness of traditional and sling exercise strength training in women, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2011; 25(2): 464- 471.
- 12. Janot J, Heltne T, Welles C et al. Effects of TRX versus traditional resistance training programs on measures of muscular performance in adults, Journal of Fitness Research 2013; 2(2): 23 -28.
- 13. Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1970; 2(2): 92- 98.
- 14. Brzycki M. Strength testing —predicting a one- rep max from reps -to-fatigue, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 1993; 64(1): 88- 90.
- 15. Mate-Munoz JL, Monroy AJ, Jodra Jim enez P et al. Effects of instability versus traditional resistance training on strength, power and velocity in untrained men, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2014; 13(3): 460- 468.
- 16. Costill DL, Wilmore JH, Kenney WL. Physiology of sport and exercise. Human Kinetics, 2008.
- 17. Behm DG, Anderson K, Curnew RS. Muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2002; 16(3): 416- 22.
- 18. Byrne JM, Bishop NS, Caines A M et al. Effect of using a suspension training system on muscle activation during the performance of a front plank exercise, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2014; 28(11): 3049- 55. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000510
- 19. Distefano LJ, Distefano MJ , Frank BS et al. Comparison of integrated and isolated training on performance measures and neuromuscular control, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2013; 27(4): 1083- 90. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280d40b
- 20. Wasik J, Wojcik A. Health in the con text of martial arts practice, Physical Activity Review 2017; 5: 91–94. doi: 10.16926/par.2017.05.013
- 21. Ortenburger D, Wasik J, Gora T. Report of the 1st World Congress on Health and Martial Arts in Interdisciplinary Approach 17 -19 September 2015. Physical Activity Rev iew 2015; 3: 49- 51. doi: 10.16926/par.2015.05.07
- 22. Wasik J, Ortenburger D, Gora T. The kinematic effects of taekwondo strokes in various conditions the outside environment. Interpretation in the psychological aspect and perspective of applicatio n in sport, health-related training and survival abilities. Archives of Budo 2016; 12: 287- 292
Publication order reference