Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 45 | 2 | 137-173
Article title

Assessing the Federal and State Regulation for Coal-Fired Electricity Generation Units (EGUs): The Case of Maryland

Title variants
Languages of publication
The Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970 led to a major regulatory shift as it enabled the Federal and State governments to regulate the emissions from both stationary and mobile sources. Older coal-fired power plants, one of the largest sources of air pollution, are not very strictly regulated by the CAA. The compliance strategy is complicated and grandfathered plants have been successful in limiting regulations affecting them. For tougher regulations on air quality and water use & ash disposal, coal-fired power plants will have two alternatives – retirement or adopting expensive control technology. Given the age of the plants, expenses of retrofitting and low electricity price, many coal-fired plants will probably choose to retire. However, there are uncertainties associated with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations as it has designed and revised many regulations in response to ‘independent and unrelated’ court orders. Maryland’s current energy policy emphasizes two strategies – improved per capita energy efficiency and renewable energy. There are currently no state initiatives that encourage using natural gas instead of coal as an emissions-reduction strategy. On the contrary, recent tightening of the state’s emissions standards for non-greenhouse gas pollutants led to significant upgrades of the state’s coal plants. Given various Federal and State initiatives to reduce GHG emissions as well as to promote environment-friendly use of resources, the future energy scenario will be much different from the present one, potentially with characteristics like greater use of natural gas, significant role of solar energy, advances in generation and innovations in transmission technologies. The present study focuses on the present scenario of Federal and State initiatives, and intends to outline the future consequences.
Physical description
  • United International University, UIU Bhaban, House# 80, Road No. 8/A (Old 15), Satmosjid Road, Dhanmondi, Dhaka 1209, Bangladesh
  • United International University, UIU Bhaban, House# 80, Road No. 8/A (Old 15), Satmosjid Road, Dhanmondi, Dhaka 1209, Bangladesh
  • [1] Celebi M, Graves F, Bathla G. and Bressan L. Potential Coal Plant Retirements Under Emerging Environmental Regulations. The Brattle Group. December 8, 2010.
  • [3] [EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234; EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044, FRL-9148-5] RIN 2060-AP52
  • [4] National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units. Proposed rule (03-16-2011).
  • [5] Frass, Arthur and Lutter, Randall. Can a Stew of Power Generation Regulations Clear the Air. Fall 2010. Resources 176. Resources for the Future.
  • [6] Maryland Department of Natural Resources Legislative Report, 2011.
  • [7] Maryland Power Plants and the Environment A review of the impacts of power plants and transmission lines on Maryland's natural resources. MARYLAND POWER PLANT RESEARCH PROGRAM. January 2010 PPRP – CEIR – 15. DNR Publication No. 12-12222009-434 Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
  • [8] McCarthy, J.E., Clean Air Issues in the 112th Congress. Congressional Research Service. January 4, 2011.
  • [9] McCarthy, J.E., EPA’s Boiler MACT: Controlling Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants. Congressional Research Service. October 21, 2010.
  • [10] The Environmental Protection Agency. 2011.
  • [11] Maryland Department of Environment (MDE). Facts about the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act of 2009. 2009a.
  • [12] Maryland Department of Environment (MDE). Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act of 2009 Bill Summary. 2009b.
  • [13] Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). EmPOWER Maryland Overview. EECBG Direct Grant Recipients Workshop. October 26, 2010.
  • [14] Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). Maryland’s Goals. Accessed on April 24, 2011.
  • [15] Energy Information Administration. Maryland Renewable Electricity Profile: 2008 Edition. August 2010.
  • [16] Public Service Commission of Maryland. Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Report of 2010. February 2010. 4, 7. MD RPS 2010 Report, 4, 7
  • [17] Institute for Energy Research. Maryland Energy Facts. April 8, 2010.
  • [18] Kay, Liz F. Report: Maryland falling short on energy-saving goals – PIRG says mismanagement by regulators led to slow progress. The Baltimore Sun. March 30, 2011.
  • [19] International Center for Sustainable Development (ICSD), Inc., DBED and MEA funded study: “Economic Development Potential of Clean Energy Technology in Maryland and Feasibility Study for a Maryland Clean Energy Center, December 31, 2006.
  • [20] Maryland Power Plant Research Program (PPRP). Long-Term Electricity Report for Maryland (LTER) EmPOWER Maryland White Paper. November 30, 2010.
  • [21] Summers, Robert M. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Act of 2009 Update. Maryland Department of Environment, Senate Finance Committee. February 1, 2011.
  • [22] Wagman, David. The Cost of Four Rules. Penn Energy. Volume 114, Issue 11. November 1, 2010.
  • [23] Wald, Matthew L. Slugging Economy Curtails Prospect for Building Nuclear Reactors. The New York Times. October 10, 2010.
  • [24] Chesapeake Climate Action Network. Maryland Passes Healthy Air Act. April 17, 2006.
  • [25] Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Auction Results.
  • [26] Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Renewable & Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards. Updated February 11, 2011.
  • [27] Environmental Protection Agency. Green Power Community Challenge Rankings. March 17, 2011.
  • [28] Ruoff, Alex. Garrett Park looks toward greener future. Gazette.Net. March 16, 2011.
  • [29] Toles, Tom. Mr. Obama New Energy: the President outlines a bipartisan Policy on Fuels. Washington Post, 1/31/11.
  • [30] The Economist. Barack Obama's energy policy: Reheated proposals. March 30, 2011.
  • [31] Marimow, Ann E. The Washington Post. Environmentalists urge O’Malley to veto waste-to-energy bill. April 26, 2011.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.