Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2012 | XVII | 1 | 27-43
Article title

Ja relacyjne-współzależne: pomiar i psychologiczne korelaty

Title variants
The relational-interdependent self-construal: measure and psychological correlates
Languages of publication
The article describes the relational-interdependent self-construal scale, as well as its psychometric characteristics and psychological correlates. It is the measure, which has been adapted to Polish conditions. The relational-interdependent self-construal scale measures individual differences in the tendency to include close others in the self. The measure was first introduced by Cross, Bacon & Morris (2000). The items were created on the basis of the definition of relationalinterdependent self-construal and earlier studies. 1579 people participated in the studies aimed at conducting exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis. Results indicate that the relational-interdependent self-construal scale consists of 9 items that form one factor. The measure is reliable and valid. There are gender differences in relational self-construal – women obtain higher scores. The relational- interdependent self-construal scale is positively associated with empathy (especially empathic concern and perspective taking), agreeableness (and to some extent with extraversion), communal values (those important for interpersonal relations, mostly with security, universalism, conformity and benevolence), and with satisfaction with romantic relationship. Relational-interdependent self-construal is not significantly associated with global self-esteem.

Physical description
  • Instytut Psychologii UG Gdańsk
  • Andersen, S.M., Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
  • Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Tudor, M., Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 60, 241-253.
  • Baumeister, R.F. (1987). How the Self became a problem: a psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1, 163-176.
  • Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (3), 497-529.
  • Baumeister, R.F., Sommer, K.L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122 (1), 38-44.
  • Cantril, H. (1965). The Patterns of Human Concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Carels, R.A., Baucom, D.H. (1999). Support in marriage: factors associated with on-line perceptions of support helpfulness. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 2, 131-144.
  • Cross, S.E. (2009). Relational self-construal: past and future. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3/6, 946-961.
  • Cross, S.E., Bacon, P.L., Morris, M.L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
  • Cross, S.E., Hardin, E., Gercek-Swing, B. (w druku). The what, how, why and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
  • Cross, S.E., Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
  • Cross, S.E., Morris, M.L. (2003). Getting to know you: the relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 512-523.
  • Cross, S.E., Morris, M.L., Gore, J.S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: the relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399-418.
  • Davis, M.H. (2001). Empatia. O umiejętności współodczuwania. Gdańsk: GWP.
  • Eisenberg, N., Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100-131.
  • Gore, J.S., Cross, S.E., Morris, M.L. (2006). Let’s be friends: relational self-construal and the development of intimacy. Personal Relationships, 13, 83-102.
  • Hennig, K.H., Walker, L.J. (2008). The darker side of accommodating others: examining the interpersonal structure of maladaptive constructs. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 2-21.
  • Kaźmierczak, M. (2008). Oblicza empatii w relacjach małżeńskich. Perspektywa psychologiczna. Gdańsk: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  • Kaźmierczak, M., Plopa, M., Retowski, S. (2007). Skala wrażliwości empatycznej. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 50, 1, 9-24.
  • Kaźmierczak, M., Michałek, J., Marchwiak, I. (w recenzji) Osobowość a satysfakcja z małżeństwa i życia – rola orientacji na relacje interpersonalne.
  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., Newton, T.L. (2001). Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 4, 472-503.
  • Locke, K.D., Christensen, L. (2007). Re-construing the relational-interdependent self-construal and its relationship with self-consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 389-402.
  • Markus, H., Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
  • McCrae, P.T., Costa, R.R. (2005). Osobowość dorosłego człowieka. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
  • Neckar, J. (2000). Narracyjne ujęcie „ja” na tle innych sposobów jego ujmowania. W: A. Gałdowa (red.), Tożsamość człowieka (s. 139-148). Kraków: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Plopa, M. (2002). Doświadczenie intymności a satysfakcja z małżeństwa. Małżeństwo i Rodzina, 3, 3, 22-26.
  • Plopa, M. (2003). Intymność a „jej” i „jego” satysfakcja ze związku małżeńskiego. W: I. Janicka, T. Rostowska (red.), Psychologia w służbie rodziny (s. 32-44), Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  • Plopa, M., Rostowski, J. (2005). Kwestionariusz Dobranego Małżeństwa KDM-2. W: M. Plopa, Więzi w małżeństwie i rodzinie. Metody badań (s. 51-108). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
  • Rudolph, K.D., Conley, S.C. (2005). The socioemotional costs and benefits of social- evaluative concerns: do girls care too much? Journal of Personality, 73, 1, 115-137.
  • Schwartz, S.H. (2004a). Basic human values: their content and structure cross countries. W: A. Tamayo, J. Porto (red.), Valores e trabalho [Values and work]. Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
  • Schwartz, S.H. (2004b). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. W: A. Tamayo, J. Porto (red.), Valores e trabalho [Values and work]. Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
  • Sinclair, L., Fehr, B. (2005). Voice vs. loyalty: self-construals and responses to dissatisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 298-304.
  • Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepanik, P., Śliwińska, M. (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae. Adaptacja polska – podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.