On the Quality of Vermicompost and Millipede Compost

• Authors: Kodandoor Sharathchandra , Bhagya B. Sharma , Kandikere R. Sridhar , Murari M. Subrahmanya Gowda
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Saprophagous fauna (e.g., earthworms and millipedes) involves the mineralization of plant detritus and enriches soil fertility. The quality of composts (physicochemical features and mineral composition) produced by earthworms (Eudrilus eugeniae) and millipedes (Arthrosphaera magna) in mesocosms using leaf litter with cow dung slurry has been compared in this study. Except for moisture and water-holding capacity, the rest of the features (conductivity, bulk density, specific gravity, and porosity) were significantly higher in vermicompost (p<0.05) than in millipede compost. Among the nutrients, organic matter, organic carbon, nitrogen, potassium, calcium, and iron contents were significantly higher in vermicompost (p<0.05) compared to millipede compost. There was no significant difference in total carbon, phosphorus, magnesium, sodium, manganese, and zinc (p>0.05), while chloride was below the detectable limit. Copper, selenium, silicon, aluminum, chromium, and sulfur were in trace amounts in vermicompost, while below detectable limits in millipede compost. The conversion efficiency of lignocellulosic material by saprophagous fauna may be dependent on the microbial consortium in their gut and lignocellulose. Although some amendments are necessary to improve the quality of manure, mixing suitable proportions of vermicompost and millipede compost may circumvent such inadequacy.

Keywords

EN

Earthworms; Manure production; Nutrient evaluation; Organic matter; Saprophagous fauna

Discipline

• AGRONOMY: AGRONOMY

• Publisher: Scientific Publishing House „DARWIN”
• Journal: World News of Natural Sciences
• Year: 2025
• Volume: 60
• Pages: 376-386

Contributors

author

Kodandoor Sharathchandra

• Department of Biosciences, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri, Mangalore, India

author

Bhagya B. Sharma

• Centre for Environmental Studies, Yenepoya (Deemed to be) University, Mangalore, India

author

Kandikere R. Sridhar

• Department of Biosciences, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri, Mangalore, India

author

Murari M. Subrahmanya Gowda

• Department of Science and Technology PURSE Laboratory, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri, Mangalore, India

References

• [1] Bonkowski M, Chengh W, Griffiths B, Alphei J, Scheu S. Microbial faunal interactions in the rhizosphere and effects on plant growth. European Journal of Soil Biology 2002; 36: 135-147
• [2] Newington JE, Setälä H, Bezemer TM, Jones TH. Potential effects of earthworms on leaf-chewer performance. Functional Ecology 2004; 18: 746751
• [3] Adetunji AI, Oberholster PJ, Erasmus M. From garbage to treasure: A review on biorefinery of organic solid wastes into valuable biobased products. Bioresource Technology Reports 2023; 24: 101610. 10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101610
• [4] Kauser H, Khwairakpam M. Organic waste management by two-stage composting process to decrease the time required for vermicomposting. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2022; 25: 102193. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102193
• [5] Singh RP, Singh P, Araujo AS, Ibrahim MH, Sulaiman O. Management of urban solid waste: Vermicomposting a sustainable option. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 2011; 55: 719–729
• [6] Geetha S, Bhagya BS, Sridhar KR. Impact of vermicompost on the productivity of two edible legumes. Journal of New Biological Reports 2020; 9:234-239
• [7] Riggle D, Holmes H. New horizons for commercial vermiculture. BioCycle 1994; 10: 58–67
• [8] Garg P, Gupta A, Satya S. Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: A comparative study. Bioresource Technology 2006; 97:391-395
• [9] Munroe G. Manual of on-farm vermicomposting and vermiculture. Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2007; p 56
• [10] Laldinthar R, Dkhar MS. Leaf litter breakdown by two earthworm species -Eisenia foetida (Exotic) and Perionyx excavatus (Indigenous) under laboratory condition. In: Kharwar RN, Upadhyay RS, Dubey NK, Raghuwanwshi R (eds). Microbial Diversity and Biotechnology in Food Security, Springer, New Delhi, India, 2014; pp. 581-588
• [11] Ambarish CN, Sridhar KR. Production and quality of pill-millipede manure: A microcosm study. Agricultural Research 2013; 2: 258-264
• [12] Ambarish CN, Sridhar KR. Chemical and microbial characterization of feed and faeces of two giant pill-millipedes from forests in the Western Ghats of India. Pedosphere 2016; 26:861-871
• [13] Sridhar KR. Biocompost and pill-millipedes. Green Horizon 2020; 1: 47-51
• [14] Antunes LFS, Fernandes LS, Vaz AFS, da Silva MSRA, Ferreira TS, dos Santos DMT, Correia MEF. Millicomposting: Sustainable technique for obtaining organic compost for the cultivation of broccoli seedlings. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 2022; 7: 100442. 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100442
• [15] Baluchamy R, Radhakrishna G. Millipede species enrich the fertility of soil in Alagar Hills Reserve Forest. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 2023; 55: 2055-2063
• [16] Ashwini KM, Sridhar KR. Leaf litter preference and conversion by a saprophagous tropical pill millipede, Arthrosphaera magna Attems. Pedobiologia 2005; 49: 307-316
• [17] Ashwini KM, Sridhar KR. Breakdown of plantation residues by pill millipedes (Arthrosphaera magna) and assessment of compost quality. Current Science 2006; 90: 954-959
• [18] Ambarish CN, Sridhar KR. Pattern of distribution of endemic pill-millipedes in the southwestern India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 2016; 69: 229-236
• [19] AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, 5th edition. Official Analytical Chemists Inc, Arlington, VA, USA, 2005
• [20] Kanwar SL, Chopra JS. Analytical Agricultural Chemistry. 4th Edition, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, 1981; p 489
• [21] Beuchat LR. Functional and electrophoretic characteristics of succinylated peanut flour protein. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 1977; 25: 258-261
• [22] Sestu S, Bekele T. Procedure for soil and plant analysis. National Soil Research Centre, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, 2000; p 110
• [23] Jackson ML. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1973; p 498
• [24] Ramamurthy N, Kannan S. SEM-EDS analysis of soil and plant (Calotropis gigantea Linn.) collected from an industrial village, Cuddalore Dt, Tamil Nadu, India. Romanian Journal of Biophysics 2009; 19: 219-226
• [25] StatSoft Inc. Statistica version 8. StatSoft Inc, Oklahoma, USA, 2008
• [26] Sullivan DM, Bary AI, Miller RO, Brewer LJ. Interpreting compost analysis. Oregon State University Extension Service, 2018; pp. 1-10
• [27] Thakur PC, Apurva P, Sinha SK. Comparative study of characteristics of biocompost produced by millipedes and earthworms. Advances in Applied Science Research 2011; 2: 94-98
• [28] Ramanathan B, Alagesan P. Evaluation of millicompost versus vermicompost. Current Science 2012; 103: 140-143
• [29] Jakubus M. Estimation of phosphorus bioavailability from composted organic wastes. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability 2016; 28: 189-198
• [30] Khan KS, Joergensen RG. Changes in microbial biomass and P fractions in biogenic household waste compost amended with inorganic P fertilizers. Bioresource Technology 2009; 100: 303-309
• [31] Malik MA, Marschner P, Khan KS. Addition of organic and inorganic P sources to soil - effects on P pools and microorganisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2012; 49: 106-113
• [32] Wako F-L, Muleta H-D. The role of vermicompost application for tomato production: a review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2022; 46: 129-144
• [33] Rajkumar G, Ramanathan B, Alagesan P. Efficiency of millipede and earthworm in the conversion of organic wastes. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2021; 17:373-377
• [34] Senthilkumar N, Lakshmidevi R, Sumathi R, Rajendran S, Divya GR, Lenora LMD. Millicompost: An alternate biocompost for forest nurseries. International Journal of Current Research 2018; 10: 70971-70974

• Document Type: article