Conscious and latent consumers’ attitudes
Languages of publication
Understanding the activity of the minds of consumers is one of the main questions tried to be solved by many scientists in the field of consumer research. Still studies are often based on tests of self-assessment, observation, often ignoring the unconscious behavior of consumers. Often the decision-making processes largely occur on a subconscious level . (G. Zaltmann, 2003) Moreover, only 5% of knowledge is conscious knowledge. Unconscious processes, allow users faster and more efficient decisions than would be possible with a fully conscious processing of the stimulus. The financial services market is one of the most important elements of a market economy. In addition, the financial services market undergoes dynamic changes and at the same time there are no studies of the actual attitudes of consumers (both conscious and hidden) in relation to a virtual financial services, in particular in respect of the banking services market, which is one of the fastest growing high-tech service markets. After secondary sources analysis, projection methods research was made. For the purposes of research, special test was prepared including projection techniques like association expression and supplement tests. This method enabled preliminary identification of hidden and conscious consumer attitudes towards virtual banking services and to introduce first conclusions for further research.
-  Brunel, F. F., Tietje, B. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test a Valid and Valuable Measure of Implicit Consumer Social Cognition? Journal of Consumer Psychology 14(4), 385-404
-  Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Olden, Z. (2006). On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 627-631.
-  Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wänke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated pre-dictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397–419
-  Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480
-  Lindstrom, M.: Buyology. The truth and lies about why we buy. Random House Inc., New York, 2008.
-  Martin, N., & Morich, K. (2011). Unconscious mental processes in consumer choice: Toward a new model of consumer behavior. Journal of Brand Management, 18(7), 483-505
-  Nevid, J. S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Implicit measures of consumer response—the search for the Holy Grail of marketing research. Psychology & Marketing, 27(10), 913-920
-  Oshikawa, S (1970), 'learning and behavior without awareness: their implications to consumer behavior and sovereignty', California Management Review, 12, 4, pp. 61-69
-  Rudman, L. A., Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic ingroup bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 494 - 509
-  Woodside, A. G., & Brasel, S. A. (2011). Unconscious thinking, feeling and behavior toward products and brands: Introduction to a Journal of Brand Management special issue. Journal of Brand Management, 18(7), 451-456
Publication order reference