Commentary on: The Bergen Study Addiction Scale: psychometric properties ofthe Italian version. A pilot study. Theoretical and methodological issues in the research on study addiction with relevance to the debate on conceptualising behavioural addictions

• Authors: Paweł Andrzej Atroszko

Title variants

PL

Komentarz redakcyjny do pracy: Skala Uzależnienia od Uczenia się Bergen: cechy psychometryczne wersji włoskojęzycznej. Badanie pilotażowe. Teoretyczne i metodologiczne zagadnienia dotyczące badania uzależnienia od uczenia się w kontekście debaty na temat konceptualizacji uzależnień behawioralnych

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper by Loscalzo and Giannini titled “The Bergen Study Addiction Scale: psychometric properties of the Italian version. A pilot study” published in the current issue of “Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna” (Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology) concerns the results of the study on an Italian validation of Bergen Study Addiction Scale (BStAS) (Atroszko, 2015; Atroszko et al., 2015).

Discipline

• MEDICINE: MEDICINE

• Journal: Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 276–282

Contributors

author

Paweł Andrzej Atroszko

• Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland,

References

• Achenbach TM: The classification of children’s psychiatric symptoms: a factor-analytic study. Psychol Monogr 1966; 80: 1–37.
• Achenbach TM, Ivanova MY, Rescorla LA et al.: Internalizing/externalizing problems: review and recommendations for clinical and research applications. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016; 55: 647–656.
• American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth edition. DSM-5. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA 2013.
• Andreassen CS: Workaholism: an overview and current status of the research. J Behav Addict 2014; 3: 1–11.
• Andreassen CS, Pallesen S: Workaholism: an addiction to work. In Preedy VR (ed.): Neuropathology of Drug Addictions and Substance Misuse. Volume 3: General Processes and Mechanisms, Prescription Medications, Caffeine and Areca, Polydrug Misuse, Emerging Addictions and Non-Drug Addictions. Academic Press, London, UK 2016: 972–983.
• Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD, Gjertsen SR et al.: The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. J Behav Addict 2013; 2: 90–99.
• Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD, Hetland J et al.: Development of a work addiction scale. Scand J Psychol 2012; 53: 265–272.
• Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD, Sinha R et al.: The relationships between workaholism and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a largescale cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0152978.
• Atroszko B, Atroszko P: Sytuacja materialna studentów, zaangażowanie i samoskuteczność w zakresie nauki a kompulsja uczenia się. Przegląd Pedagogiczny 2013; (2): 45–53. Available from: http://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/handle/item/957.
• Atroszko P: Relationship between financial resources and home environment and student’s learning-related attitudes, beliefs and behaviors. Ad Alta: J Interdiscipl Res 2013a; 3: 7–10. Available from: http://www. magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/0302/papers/A_atroszko.pdf.
• Atroszko P: Uzależnienie od pracy – wynik „słabej woli” czy potrzeby doskonałości? Stud Psychologica 2010; 10: 179–201.
• Atroszko PA: Research on behavioural addictions: work addiction. In: Baranowska-Szczepańska M, Gołaszewski M (eds.): Modern Research Trends of Young Scientists: Current Status, Problems and Prospects. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Handlu i Usług, Poznań 2012: 11–24.
• Atroszko PA: The Structure of Study Addiction: Selected Risk Factors and the Relationship with Stress, Stress Coping and Psychosocial Functioning. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 2015.
• Atroszko PA: Zachowania i postawy studentów związane z uczeniem się a determinanty rozwoju gospodarki opartej na wiedzy. In: Osiński J, Pachocka M (eds.): Zmieniający się świat. Perspektywa demograficzna, społeczna i gospodarcza. Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej, Warszawa 2013b: 185–197.
• Atroszko PA, Griffiths MD: Work addiction is not new to the psychological literature and has evolved over time. Glob J Add Rehab Med 2017; 3: 555612.
• Atroszko PA, Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD et al.: Study addiction: a cross-cultural longitudinal study examining temporal stability and predictors of its changes. J Behav Addict 2016a; 5: 357–362.
• Atroszko PA, Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD et al.: Study addiction – a new area of psychological study: conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings. J Behav Addict 2015; 4: 75–84.
• Atroszko PA, Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD et al.: The relationship between study addiction and work addiction: a cross-cultural longitudinal study. J Behav Addict 2016b; 5: 708–714.
• Atroszko PA, Balcerowska JM, Bereznowski P et al.: Facebook addiction among Polish undergraduate students: validity of measurement and relationship with personality and well-being. Comput Human Behav 2018; 85: 329–338.
• Atroszko PA, Pallesen S, Griffiths MD et al.: Work addiction in Poland: adaptation of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale and relationship with psychopathology. J Health Psychol 2017; 5: 345–355.
• Baker A: Simplicity. In: Zalta EN (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2004. Bauer HH: Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, IL 1994.
• Billieux J, Schimmenti A, Khazaal Y et al.: Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. J Behav Addict 2015; 4: 119–123.
• Blaszczynski A, Collins P, Fong D et al.: Responsible gambling: general principles and minimal requirements. J Gambl Stud 2011; 27: 565–573.
• Bollen KA: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY 1989.
• Burke RJ, Fiksenbaum L: Work hours, work intensity, and work addiction: costs and benefits. In: Burke RJ, Cooper CL (eds.): The Long Work Hours Culture: Causes, Consequences and Choices. Emerald, Bingley, UK: 2008: 3–36.
• Charlton BG: Clever sillies: why high IQ people tend to be deficient in common sense. Med Hypotheses 2009; 73: 867–870.
• Charlton BG: Not Even Trying: The Corruption of Real Science. University of Buckingham Press, Buckingham, UK 2012.
• Crombie AC: Medieval and Early Modern Science, Vol. 2: Science in the Later Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, XIII–XVII Centuries. Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden City, NY 1959: 30.
• Diedrich A, Voderholzer U: Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder: a current review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2015; 17: 2.
• Dutton E, van der Linden D: Who are the “Clever Sillies”? The intelligence, personality, and motives of clever silly originators and those who follow them. Intelligence 2015; 49: 57–65.
• European Agency for Safety and Health at Work: Calculating the cost of work-related stress and psychosocial risks. European Risk Observatory. Literature Review. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2014.
• Fassel D: Working Ourselves To Death: The High Cost of Workaholism and the Rewards of Recovery. Harper, San Francisco, CA 1990.
• Ferenczi S: II. Sonntagsneurosen. Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse 1919; 5: 46–48.
• Fleck L: Crisis in science. In: Cohen RS, Schnelle T (eds.): Cognition and Fact. Materials on Ludwik Fleck. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 87. Springer, Dordrecht 1986: 153–158.
• Gerstein D, Murphy S, Toce M et al.: Gambling Impact and Behavior Study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago 1999.
• Grant JE, Potenza MN, Weinstein A et al.: Introduction to behavioral addictions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2010; 36: 233–241.
• Griffiths M: A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Use 2005; 10: 191–197.
• Griffiths MD: Behavioural addiction and substance addiction should be defined by their similarities not their dissimilarities. Addiction 2017; 112: 1718–1720.
• Griffiths MD, Demetrovics, Atroszko PA: Ten myths about work addiction. J Behav Addict 2018: 1–13.
• Henson RK, Roberts JK: Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas 2006; 66: 393–416.
• Jacobs DF: A general theory of addictions: a new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Behavior 1986; 2: 15–31.
• Kardefelt-Winther D, Heeren A, Schimmenti A et al.: How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours? Addiction 2017; 112: 1709–1715.
• Kendler KS, Prescott CA, Myers J et al.: The strucvture of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 60: 929–937.
• King SM, Iacono WG, McGue M: Childhood externalizing and internalizing psychopathology in the prediction of early substance use. Addiction 2004; 99: 1548–1559.
• Koob GF, Volkow ND: Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010; 35: 217–238.
• Krueger RF, Markon KE: Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2006; 2: 111–133.
• Krueger RF, Markon KE, Patrick CJ et al.: Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood: a dimensional-spectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM-V. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114: 537–550.
• Levy N: Addiction is not a brain disease (and it matters). Front Psychiatry 2013; 4: 24.
• Lewis M: Addiction and the brain: development, not disease. Neuroethics 2017; 10: 7–18.
• Loscalzo Y, Giannini M: Clinical conceptualization of workaholism: a comprehensive model. Organizational Psychology Review 2017; 7: 306–329.
• Loscalzo Y, Giannini M: The Bergen Study Addiction Scale: psychometric properties of the Italian version. A pilot study. Psychiatr Psychol Klin 2018; 18: 271–275.
• Madison G, Dutton E, Stern C: Intelligence, competitive altruism, and “clever silliness” may underlie bias in academe. Behav Brain Sci 2017; 40: e9.
• Makel MC, Plucker JA: Facts are more important than novelty: replication in the education sciences. Educ Res 2014; 43: 304–316.
• Maraz A, Király O, Demetrovics Z: Commentary on: Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. The diagnostic pitfalls of surveys: if you score positive on a test of addiction, you still have a good chance not to be addicted. J Behav Addict 2015; 4: 151–154.
• Marmet S, Studer J, Rougemont-Bücking A et al.: Latent profiles of family background, personality and mental health factors and their association with behavioural addictions and substance use disorders in young Swiss men. Eur Psychiatry 2018; 52: 76–84.
• Maughan DR, Christiansen E, Jenson WR et al.: Behavioral parent training as a treatment for externalizing behaviors and disruptive behavior disorders: a meta-analysis. School Psych Rev 2005; 34: 267–286.
• Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M: Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012; 7: 615–631.
• Oates WE: Confession of a Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction. World Publishing, New York 1971.
• Orosz G, Dombi E, Andreassen CS et al.: Analyzing models of work addiction: single factor and bi-factor models of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale. Int J Ment Health Addict 2016; 14: 662–671.
• Paluchowski WJ, Hornowska E: Pracoholizm a system wartości i uwarunkowania temperamentalne. In: Witkowski SA (ed.): Psychologiczne wyznaczniki sukcesu w zarządzaniu. Tom VI. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2003: 295–319.
• Popper K: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London 1992.
• Popper KR: The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. Routledge, 1994.
• Robbins TW, Gillan CM, Smith DG et al.: Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: towards dimensional psychiatry. Trends Cogn Sci 2012; 16: 81–91.
• Robins E, Guze SB: Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1970; 126: 983–987.
• Robinson BE: Workaholism: bridging the gap between workplace, sociocultural, and family research. J Employ Couns 2000; 37: 31–47.
• Satel S, Lilienfeld SO: Addiction and the brain-disease fallacy. Front Psychiatry 2014; 4: 141.
• Schmitt TA: Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychoeduc Assess 2011; 29: 304–321.
• Shaffer HJ, LaPlante DA, LaBrie RA et al.: Toward a syndrome model of addiction: Multiple expressions, common etiology. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2004; 12: 367–374.
• Shiffman S: Coping and Substance Use. Academic Press, London 1985.
• Sinha R: Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1141: 105–130.
• Thompson B, Daniel LG: Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: a historical overview and some guidelines. Educ Psychol Meas 1996; 56: 197–208.
• Wagenmakers EJ, Wetzels R, Borsboom D et al.: Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). J Pers Soc Psychol 2011; 100: 426–432.
• Woodley MA: Are high-IQ individuals deficient in common sense? A critical examination of the ‘clever sillies’ hypothesis. Intelligence 2010; 38: 471–480.
• Ziman J: Real Science: What It Is and What It Means. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2002.

• Document Type: article