PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2017 | 11 | 19-27
Article title

Survey of benefits and constraints of urban trees in Kaduna Metropolis

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This study was used to assess public opinion of the economic and ecological importance of various tree species in Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna state. A total of one hundred (100) questionnaires were randomly administered among four purposively selected towns (Angwa-Rimi and Kawo new extension in Kaduna North and Bar’nawa and Sabo in Kaduna South) within the two major local governments in the study area. Twenty-five (25) questionnaires were randomly distributed across age and sex in each of the four (4) selected towns. Of these, ninety were retrieved for analysis. Data analysis was achieved through descriptive analysis. This included frequency distribution tables, percentages and charts. The results show that the majority of the respondents were aged between (21-30) and (31-40) years, these figures representing (44.4%) and (30.0%), respectively, of the entire study population. In addition, most had secondary education (53.3%). In the stated opinions, Meliaceae occur most often. Other trees species identified in the study area include Eucalyptus spp, Azadiracta indica, Psidium guajava, Terminalia catapa, Mangifera indica, Anacardium occidentalis, Khaya senegalensis, Gmelina arboria, pinus spp, Carica papaya, Moringa olifera, Gliricidia sepium, Ficus spp, Afzelia spp, Balanite eagyptiaca, Borassus aethiopum, Persae americana, Polyantha longifolia etc. The following characteristics mark these tree species out as being economically and ecologically important: fast growth, deep rooting pattern, coppicing ability, ability to produce large crown size, tolerance to adverse weather condition, ability of trees to produce broad leaves for shade production, erosion protection, ability to provide fruits, aesthetics and beautification values. In conclusion, urban tree planting is a potential strategy to ameliorate ecological and economic concerns; thus, there is need for the dwellers in the study area to intensify efforts towards planting trees around their houses. Without this, the influx of people, urbanization and industrialization will create deleterious environmental conditions in the study area. It is recommended that efforts to make the populace aware of the economic and ecological significance of urban trees be intensified.
Discipline
Year
Volume
11
Pages
19-27
Physical description
Contributors
  • Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry Mechanization, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry Mechanization, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria
  • Trial Afforestation Research Station, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Agricultural Engineering Technology, Federal College of Forestry Mechanisation, Afaka Kaduna State, Nigeria
References
  • [1] Babalola F. D: Issues and option for appropriate management strategies of campus tree at university of Ibadan, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Ecology 11 (2010) 33-42
  • [2] Faleyimu, O. I Public perceptions of Urban Forests in Okitipupa Nigeria: Implication for Environmental Conservation. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage 18 (3) (2014) 469-478
  • [3] L. M. Anderson, H. K. Cordell. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 15, Issues 1–2, June 1988, Pages 153-164
  • [4] Sudipto Roy, Jason Byrne, Catherine Pickering. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Volume 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 351-363
  • [5] Geoffrey H. Donovan, David T. Butry. The value of shade: Estimating the effect of urban trees on summertime electricity use. Energy and Buildings Volume 41, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages 662-668
  • [6] Colin Price. Quantifying the aesthetic benefits of urban forestry. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Volume 1, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 123-133
  • [7] Dwyer, J.F., McPherson, E.G., Schroeder, H.W., &. Rowntree, R.A. (1992). Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18(5), 227-234.
  • [8] Dwyer, M.C., & Miller, R.W. (1999). Using GIS to assess urban tree canopy benefits and surrounding greenspace distributions. Journal of Arboriculture, 30(1), 102-106
  • [9] Fraser, D.G.E., & Kenney, W.A. (2000). Cultural background and landscape history as factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 26(2), 106-112
  • [10] Gorman, J. (2004). Residents' opinions on the value of street trees depending on tree allocation. Journal of Arboriculture, 30(1), 36-43
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-4aba2161-baec-4ac7-8eb8-448ed09784c8
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.