PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2020 | 142 | 88-102
Article title

Research and proposed solutions for improvement of the competitiveness of regions in Vietnam

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The Provincial Competitiveness Index is an indicator to evaluate and rank the governments of provinces and cities of Vietnam in terms of the quality of economic governance and building a favorable business environment. This is a measure of the level of local competitiveness in attracting and supporting development investment enterprises in a province. In recent years, localities have had many changes in policies and mechanisms, creating a strong attraction for investors, especially FDI. This plays an important role in promoting the development of local socio-economic sectors. The provincial government has been making great efforts to improve the business environment, creating favorable conditions for businesses and investors in the area. Therefore, many provinces and cities have risen to the top among localities in attracting investment, especially FDI. These successes have brought researchers, organizations at home and abroad to pay attention to the role of the provincial level, but more specifically the provincial competitiveness in Vietnam. Therefore, the study of provincial competitiveness index is not only aimed at promoting the development of the economy in general, but also contributes to exploiting the strengths of regional, sectoral and inter-regional relations. local in the development process.
Year
Volume
142
Pages
88-102
Physical description
Contributors
  • Faculty of Economic Information System, Thai Nguyen University of Information and Communication Technology, Thai Nguyen City, Vietnam
References
  • [1] Barney, J., Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management Vol 17, Issue 1, 1991, 99-120.
  • [2] Benita M Beamon. Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International Journal of Production Economics Volume 55, Issue 3, 15 August 1998, Pages 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00079-6
  • [3] Gillian E. Metzger, Kevin M. Stack, Internal Administrative Law. Michigan Law Review 115(8) (2017) 1239-1307
  • [4] Heinen, J. S. & O’Neill, C. Managing talent to maximise performance. Employment Relations Today 32(2) (2004) 67-82
  • [5] Jocelyn Cheung, Police Accountability. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles Vol 78, Issue 1, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.78.1.3.65233
  • [6] Mark Tushnet. Rule by Law or Rule of Law? Asia Pacific Law Review Volume 22, 2014, Issue 2, Pages 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2014.11745925
  • [7] Srivastava Rajendra Kumar, Fahey Liam and Christensen H. Kurt. The Resource-Based View and Marketing: The Role of Market-Based Assets in Gaining Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 27(6) (2001) 777-802.
  • [8] David J Teece. A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies January 2014, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54
  • [9] Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2007. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review, 47 (2): 175-192
  • [10] Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2008. Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of the managers in the economic system. Organizational Studies, 29 (8-9): 1187-1208
  • [11] Barney, J. B. 1986. Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11 (3): 656-665
  • [12] Barreto, I. 2010. Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36 (1): 256-280
  • [13] Buckley, P. J. 2007. The strategy of multinational enterprises in the light of the rise of China. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23 (2): 107-126
  • [14] Williamson, O. E. 1981. The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (4): 1537-1568
  • [15] Teece, D. J. 2006. Reflections on the Hymer thesis and the multinational enterprise. International Business Review, 15 (2): 124-139
  • [16] Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3): 237-250
  • [17] Pitelis, C. N., & Teece, D. J. 2010. Cross-border market co-creation, dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19 (4): 1247-1270.
  • [18] Pitelis, C. N. 2004. Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy. International Business Review, 13 (4): 523-532
  • [19] Phene, A., & Almeida, P. 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5): 901-919
  • [20] O’Reilly, C. A., Harreld, J. B., & Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. California Management Review, 51 (4): 75-99.
  • [21] Mansfield, E., Romeo, A., & Teece, D. 1979. Overseas research and development by US-based firms. Economica, 46 (182): 187-196.
  • [22] Nguyen Thi Hang, Research on a number of applicable forecasting techniques in economic analysis, supporting enterprises to decide management. World Scientific News 119 (2019) 52-67
  • [23] Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-4742e75e-50c1-4bd3-a675-dded14cda1f6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.