Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 19 | 133-147
Article title

New International Security Paradigm related to Water and Environmental Security

Title variants
Languages of publication
Security is constantly changing, which means security professionals need to be proactive, says a former US military Chief Information Officer. Water security has become a central feature of the global policy agenda. Climate change, population growth, and pollution are altering the distribution of water resources and the political control of these resources is becoming increasingly contested. These and other water security threats are a source of conflict not only within countries but across international boundaries. Security is a multidimensional issue, because individual welfare is more central to policy-making than it was fifty years ago. Individual security can no longer be satisfied only through military measures; it needs a multidimensional understanding. Security is elusive; more than ever, it is embedded in the interaction of localizing and globalizing forces. The axes of conflict in the shadow of the Cold War and under the impact of 9/11 are already proven to be more complex, not less, and more difficult to manage, not easier. The Word is in a very fast changing prosess including international security paradigm. Indeed, everything has not changed - but what has changed did so faster than we ever expected.The Cold War superimposed on the international security agenda a political and conceptual framework that simplified most issues while magnifying some and obscuring others. During this period, almost every western government defined national security in excessively narrow military terms. That meant there was an enduring acceptance of the need for a balance of terror, with mutually assured destruction ensuring a stable international system. The end of the Cold War revealed a different set of threats and dangers, not really new but previously kept outside the Cold War context. These new threats are again global in scope, persistent in nature, and potent in their implications [12]. It’s easy to equate “national security” or “global security” with military defense against rogue states and terrorism, but a leading U.S. military expert says that view is far too narrow—and could lead to catastrophe if not changed. The environmental matters had little overall public concern before. It was a reflection of how limited and unstrategic our thinking about security. Environmental change, in general, can lead to a decrease in the quality of life and increased tension, competition, instability and conflict. In parallel to climate change, water security is an issue today closely linked to environmental security. Natural resources, such as water, show a number of threats and risks that may contribute to the amplification of a conflict. Perhaps if we were to pay more attention to the documented effects of particular conditions and events, rather than to the threat-worthiness, we could see the world differently-and more accurately. The question of the water and environmental security is more ominous than that of peace and war.
Physical description
  • [1] Atilla SANDIKLI-Bilgehan EMEKLİER 2012 Güvenlik Yaklaşımlarında Değişim ve Dönüşüm. Teoriler Işığında Güvenlik, Savaş, Barış Ve Çatışma Çözümleri Bildiriler Kitabı Bilgesam Yayını, İstanbul.
  • [2] Bülent Aras, Şule Toktaş ve Ümit Kurt 2010. “Araştırma Merkezlerinin Yükselişi: Türkiye’de Dış Politika Ve Ulusal Güvenlik Kültürü”. SETA Yayınları XI, I. Baskı: Kasım 2010, ISBN: 978-605-4023-09-7
  • [3] Buzan, Barry. 1987. An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • [4] Cha, Victor D. 2000. “Globalization and the Study of International Security,” Journal of Peace Research 37(3): 391- 403
  • [5] Nihal ERGÜL 2012. Yeni Güvenlik Anlayışı Kapsamında Birleşmiş Milletler’in Rolü ve Uygulamaları TEORİLER IŞIĞINDA GÜVENLİK, SAVAŞ, BARIŞ ve ÇATIŞMA ÇÖZÜMLERİ. Editör; Atilla SANDIKLI .Bilgesam Yayınları İSTANBUL 2012
  • [6] Oli Brown,2008 Migration and Climate Change, (Geneva: International Organization For Migration Series, 2008), 11.
  • [7] Oktay F. Tanrısever, “Güvenlik”, içinde Devlet ve Ötesi, der. Atilla Eralp, (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2005), 108
  • [8] Ömer Göksel İşyar, “Günümüzde Uluslararası Güvenlik Stratejileri: Kavramsal Çerçeve ve Uygulama”, Akademik Bakış 2 3 (2008): 6.
  • [9] Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Contstruction of Power Politics” International Organization 46(2): 391-425.
  • [10] Gregory D. Foster 2005 “A New Security Paradigm” the January/February 2005 WORLD WATCH Magazine.
  • [11] Mustafa Aydın & Kostas Ifantis (eds.) International Security Today Understanding Change and Debating Strategy SAM Paper • 1/2006
  • [12] Sean Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller, 'Introduction', in Sean Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller (eds.), Global Dangers: Changing Dimensions of International Security, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1995, p. 3.
  • [13] John D. Steinbruner, Principles of Global Security, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2000, p. 195.
  • [14] Pierre Hassner, 'Obstinate and Obsolete: Non-Territorial Transnational Forces versus the European Territorial State', in Ola Tunander, Pavel Baev and Victoria Ingrid Einagel (eds.), Geopolitics in Post-Wall Europe: Security, Territory and Identity, London, Sage Publications/International Peace Researh Institute, Oslo, 1997, p. 58.
  • [15] Kenneth D. Bush and E. Fuat Keyman, 'Identity-Based Conflict: Rethinking Security in a Post-Cold War World', Global Governance, Vol. 3, No. 3, September-December 1997, p. 314
  • [16] Zaki Laidi, 'Introduction: Imagining the Post-Cold War Era', Zaki Laidi (ed.), Power and Purpose after the Cold War, Oxford, Berg Publishers, 1994, p. 2.
  • [17] Alessandro Politi, European Security: The New Transnational Risks, Chaillot Papers 29, WEU Institute for Security Studies, October 1997, p. 13.
  • [18] Clifford Beal, 'Everything Has Changed… Nothing Has Changed', Jane's Defence Weekly, Vol. 38, No. 11, September 2002 pp. 8-9.
  • [19] See Kenneth Waltz, 'The Continuity of International Politics,' in Ken Booth and Tim Dunne (eds.), Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002, p. 353
  • [20] Andreea C. ZUGRAVU NON-STATE THREATS AND THE NEW SECURITY PARADIGM - Armed Groups in Romania’s National Security Strategy - Romanian Military Thinking ~ 1/2010
  • [21] Sean Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller, 'Introduction', in Sean Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller (eds.), Global Dangers: Changing Dimensions of International Security, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1995, p. 3.
  • [22] Kenneth N. Waltz, 'Structural Realism after the Cold War', International Security, Vol. 25, No. 1, Summer 2000, p. 5.
  • [23] Gregory D. Foster 2005 “A New Security Paradigm” the January/February 2005 WORLD WATCH Magazine.
  • [25] Florence Lozet and Kim Edou “Water and Environmental Security for Conflict Prevention in Times of Climate Change” Global Water Institute 2013.
  • [26] Gleick, Peter H. “Water and Conflict” International Security. Vol 18 N 1. 1993.
  • [27] UNEP, “Linking Environment and Security” Regional Office for Europe: Key Activities. 2013. Available at
  • [28] Butts, Kent Hughes. “NATO’s Contributions to European Environmental Security” 1993. Available at a275918.pdf
  • [29] Pacific Institute, Updated 11/09. 14
  • [30] GWI’s Team, Fall 2013.Water and environmental security for conflict prevention in times of climate change,
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.