Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 33 | 43-55
Article title

The study of the effects of tax evasion and tax revenues on economic stabilities in OECD countries

Title variants
Languages of publication
The issue of tax evasion has received a considerable attention from researchers and policy making institutions over the past decades. Various studies have been conducted on tax evasion and tax avoidance, and its effects on income inequality and economic growth. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of tax evasion and government tax revenues on economic stability. For this reason, 29 OECD countries’ data from 1990-2013 is used and panel approach is applied to estimate the results. In the first step, using monetary approach, an index for tax evasion for OECD countries is estimated. In the second step, the effects of tax evasion and tax revenues on economic stability are studied. The results show that tax evasion and income tax rate has a U shape relationship. That is, as tax rate increase the probability of tax evasion would also increase. Also, it is found that tax evasion lead to economic instability and more tax revenues will be beneficial to a better economic condition.
Physical description
  • Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, Kargar-e-shomali, Po Box 14155-6445, Tehran, Iran,
  • Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, Kargar-e-shomali, Po Box 14155-6445, Tehran, Iran
  • [1] Afuberoh, Dennis and Okoye Emmanuel, (2014). “The Impact of Taxation on Revenue Generation in Nigeria: A study of Federal Capital Territory and Selected States”, International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research, Vol. 2(2), 22-47.
  • [2] Baltagi, B.H., (2005). Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, Chichester.
  • [3] Clotfelter, C.T, (1983). Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns, The review of economics and statistics, 4: 363-373.
  • [4] Dalu, T., Maposa, V.G., Pabwaungana, S. and Dalu, T. (2012). ‘The impact of tax evasion and avoidance on the economy: a case of Harare, Zimbabwe’, African J. Economic and Sustainable Development, 1(3), 284-296.
  • [5] Feige, E.L, (1979). “How big is the irregular economy?”, Challenge, 22; 5-13.
  • [6] Friedman, Eric; Simon Johnsen; Daniel Kaufmann and Pablo Zoido-Lobaton (2000). Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries, Journal of public economics, 76; 459-493.
  • [7] Ilaboya, O. J and Ofiafoh, E. (2014). Tax Ratio and Output Volatility: Linear Time Series Evidence from Nigeria, Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5; 245-257.
  • [8] Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. and Shin, Y. (1997) Testing for Unit Roots in heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Economics. 3, 115; 53-74.
  • [9] Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors,” Oxford Buellton Economic Statistics, 61, 653-678.
  • [10] Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and finite samples properties of pooled time series Tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economic Theory 20, 597-625.
  • [11] Guttmann, P. M. (1977). Subterranean Economy. Financial Analysis Journal, 11(4); 26-27.
  • [12] Kemal, M. A (2003). Underground economy and tax evasion in Pakistan: A critical evaluation,
  • [13] Martinez-Vazquez, J., Vulovic, V., &Lui, Y. (2009). Direct versus indirect taxation: Trends, theory and economic significance. International Studies Program Working Paper, 09-11, Georgia State University.
  • [14] Posch, O. (2009). Explaining output volatility: the case of taxation.
  • [15]
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.