PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2014 | 19 | 1 | 17-49
Article title

Beyond the Big Five – review of new models of personality structure

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The paper is a review of current discussion on the Big Five model and new proposals of personality structure description. The discussion concerns three main claims of the Big Five model: (1) the claim about number of basic traits; (2) the claim about the organization of lower-level traits and (2) the claim about relations between the basic traits. Critique of each claim has led to a counterproposal that describes the personality structure in a different way. Critique of the first assumption is supported by the proposal of increasing to six number of basic traits in the HEXACO model (Ashton, Lee, 2001, 2007). Critique of the second assumption is supported by the proposals of different lower-traits organization. The Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex (Hofstee, De Raad, Goldberg, 1992; Goldberg, 1999) and the model of 10 aspects located between the basic five traits and their facets (DeYoung, Quilty, Peterson, 2007) there are reviewed in the paper. The critique of the third assumption argues that the five traits are not orthogonal and the systematical relations between them can be explained by two higher-order factors (Digman, 1997; DeYoung, Peterson, Higgins, 2002) or even one General Factor of Personality (Musek, 2007; Rushton, Irving, 2011).
Year
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
17-49
Physical description
References
  • Allik, J., McCrae, R.R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 13-28.
  • Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., John, O.P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. Special Issue: Personality language. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89-118.
  • Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R., Lockwood, P. (2009). The Nature and Structure of Correlations Among Big Five Ratings: The Halo-Alpha-Beta Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1142-1156.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-Humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1321-1353.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K. (2010). On the cross-language replicability of personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 436-441.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., De Vries, R. E., Perugini, M., Gnisci, A., Sergi, I. (2006). The HEXACO model of personality structure and indigenous lexical personality dimensions in Italian, Dutch, and English. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 851-875.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L.R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707-721.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L.R., De Vries, R.E. (2009). Higher Order Factors of Personality: Do They Exist? Personality And Social Psychology Review, 13(2), 79-91.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R.E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356-366.
  • Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Son, C. (2000). Honesty as the sixth factor of personality: correlation with machiavellianism, primary psychopathy, and social adroitness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 359-368.
  • Backstrom, M., Larsson, M.R., Maddux, R.E. (2009). A structural validation of an inventory based on the Abridged Five Factor Circumplex Model (AB5C). Journal of Personality Assesment, 91(5), 462-472.
  • Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V. (2002). Studies of the Big Five Questionnaire. W: B. De Raad, M. Perugini (red.), Big Five Assessment (s. 109-128). Seattle-Toronto-Bern-Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
  • Baumeister, R.F., Tice, D.M. (1988). Metatraits. Journal of Personality, 56, 571-598.
  • Bäckström, M. (2007). Higher-order factors in a Five-Factor Personality Inventory and its relation to social desirability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,23(2), 63-70.
  • Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., Larsson, M.R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 335-344.
  • Becker, P. (1998). A multifacets circumplex model of personality as a basis for the description and therapy of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12(3), 213-225.
  • Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511-530.
  • Biesanz, J.C., West, S.G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72, 845-876.
  • Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 177, 187-215.
  • Block, J. (2001). Millennial contrarianism: The five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 98-107.
  • Boies, K., Lee, K., Ashton, M.C., Pascal, S., Nicol, A.A.M. (2001). The structure of the French Personality Lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 15, 277-295.
  • Bollen, K., Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305-314.
  • Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71(3), 425-440.
  • Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Perugini, M. (1993). The Big Five Questionnaire: A new questionnaire for measurement of the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281-288.
  • Chang, L., Connelly, B.S., Geeza, A.A. (2012). Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: A meta-analytic multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 408-426.
  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (1992a). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (1992b). Four ways Five Factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (1992c). Replay to Eysenck. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 861-865.
  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 29, 21-50.
  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (2000). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Interpretative Report. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
  • Depue, R.A., Collins, P.F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491-569.
  • De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality in three word-classes of the Dutch Language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 13-29.
  • De Raad, B. (red.) (2000). The Big Five personality factors: The psycholexical approach to personality. Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
  • De Raad, B. (2009). Structural models of personality. W: P.J. Corr, G. Matthews (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology (s. 127-147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Raad, B., Barelds, D.P.H. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 347-364.
  • De Raad, B., Barelds, D.P.H., Mlacic, B., Church, A.T., Katigbak, M.S., Ostendorf, F., Hrebícková, M., Di Blas, L., Szirmák, Z. (2010). Only three personality factors are fully replicable across languages: Reply to Ashton and Lee. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 442-445.
  • De Raad, B., Barelds, D.P.H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlacic, B., Di Blas, L., Hrebickova, M., Szirmak, Z., Szarota, P., Perugini, M., Church, A.T., Katigbak, M .S. (2010). Only Three Factors of Personality Description Are Fully Replicable Across Languages: A Comparison of 14 Trait Taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 160-173.
  • De Raad, B., Di Blas, L., Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality, 12, 19-41.
  • De Raad, B., Perugini, M. (2002). Big Five factor assessment: Introduction. W: B. De Raad, M. Perugini (red.), Big Five Assessment (s. 1-26). Seattle-Toronto-Bern-Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
  • De Raad, B., Peabody, D. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: Analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451-474.
  • De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Hrebickova, M., Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212-232.
  • De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Szirmak, Z. (1997). In pursuit of a cross-lingual reference structure of personality traits: Comparisons among five languages. European Journal of Personality, 11, 167-185.
  • De Vries, R.E. (2011). No support for a general factor of personality in a reanalysis of Van der Linden et al. (2010). Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 512-516.
  • DeYoung, C.G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multiinformant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138-1151.
  • DeYoung, C.G. (2010). Toward a Theory of the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 26-33.
  • DeYoung, C.G., Hasher, L., Djikic, M., Criger, B., Peterson, J.B. (2007). Morning people are stable people: Circadian rhythm and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 267-276.
  • DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B., Higgins, D.M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533-552.
  • DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B., Seguin, J.R., Pihl, R.O., Tremblay, R.E. (2008). Externalizing behavior and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 947-953.
  • DeYoung, C.G., Shamosh, N.A., Green, A.E., Braver, T.S., Gray, J.R. (2009). Intellect as distinct from Openness: Differences revealed by fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 883-892.
  • DeYoung, C.G., Weisberg, Y.J., Quilty, L.C., Peterson, J.B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81(5), 465-475.
  • DeYoung, C.G., Quilty, L.C., Peterson, J.B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 888-896.
  • Di Blas, L., Forzi, M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of descriptors in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality, 12, 75-101.
  • Di Blas, L., Forzi, M. (1999). Refining a descriptive structure of personality attributes in the Italian language: The abridged Big Three circumplex structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 451-481. Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
  • Digman, J.M. (1997). Higher-order factor of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
  • Erdle, S., Irwing, P., Rushton, J.P., Park, J. (2010). The General Factor of Personality and its relation to self-esteem in 628,640 internet respondents. Personality and Individual Differences 48, 343-346.
  • Eysenck, H.J. (1990). Biological Dimensions of Personality. W: L. A. Pervin (red.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and research (s. 244-276). New York-London: Guilford Press.
  • Eysenck, H.J. (1991). Dimensions of Personality: 16, 5 or 3? – Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.
  • Eysenck, H.J. (1992). Four ways Five Factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
  • Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, M.W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Ferguson, E., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Pickering, A., Weiss, A. (2011). Five into one doesn’t go: A critique of the general factor o personality. W: T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, A. Furnham (red.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (s. 162-186). West Sussux, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Fiske, D.W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329-344.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. W: L. Wheeler (red.), Review of personality and social psychology (t. 2, s. 141-165). Beverly Hills. CA: Sage.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”. The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers of Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1993). The structure of personality traits: Vertical and horizontal aspects. W: D.C. Funder, R.D. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, K. Widaman (red.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (s. 169-188). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several Five-Factor models. W: I. Merviel de, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, F. Ostendorf (red.), Personality Psychology in Europe (t. 7, s. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
  • Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R.,
  • Gough, H.G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
  • Goldberg, L.R., Somer, O. (2000). The hierarchical structure of common Turkish person- descriptive adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 14, 497-531.
  • Gorbaniuk, O., Budzińska, A., Owczarek, M., Bożek, E., Juros, K. (2013). The Factor Structure of Polish Personality-Descriptive Adjectives: Psycho-lexical Study. European Journal of Personality, 27, 304-318.
  • Gray, J.A. (1987). Perspective on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 493-509.
  • Grossberg, S. (1987). Competitive learning: from interactive activation to adaptive resonance. Cognitive Science, 11, 23-63.
  • Hahn, D.W., Lee, K., Ashton, M.C. (1999). A factor analysis of the most frequently used Korean personality trait adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 13, 261-282.
  • Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior: I, II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.
  • Hirsh, J.B., DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B. (2009). Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior. Journal of Personality, 77, 1085-1102.
  • Hirsh, J.B., DeYoung, C.G., Xu, X., Peterson, J.B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness with political ideology and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 655-664.
  • Hofstee, W.K.B. (2001). Intelligence and personality: do they mix? W: J.M. Collis, S. Messick (red.), Intelligence and personality: bridging the gap in theory and measurement (s. 43-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hofstee, W.K.B., De Raad, B., Goldberg, L.R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1),
  • Hofstee, W.K.B., Kiers, H.A., De Raad, B., Goldberg, L.R. (1997). A comparison of Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11, 15-31.
  • Holden, R.R., Marjanovic, Z. (2012). A putatively general factor of personality (GFP) is not so general: A demonstration with the NEO PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 37-40.
  • Hopwood, C.J., Wright, A.G.C., Donnellan, M.B. (2011). Evaluating the evidence for the general factor of personality across multiple inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 468-478.
  • Hull, D.M., Beaujean, A.A. (2011). Higher-order factors of personality in Jamaican young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 878-882.
  • Jang, K.L., Livesley, W.J., Ando, J., Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. (2006). Behavioral genetics of the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 261-272.
  • Jarmuż, S. (1994). Metodologiczne problemy związane z weryfikacją modelu „Wielkiej Piątki”. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 37, 195-203.
  • Jarmuż, S. (2008). Wielka Piątka – etap podróży czy stacja końcowa? Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11(1), 139-142.
  • Jarmuż, S., Lach, Ł. (2007). Metacecha a struktura czynnikowa kwestionariusza NEO-FFI. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 50(3), 303-317.
  • John, O.P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimension of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. W: L.A. Pervin (red.), Handbook of Personality theory and research (s. 66-100). New York: Guilford Press.
  • John, O.P., Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, Measurement, and theoretical perspectives. W: L.A. Pervin, O.P. John (red.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (s. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Just, C. (2011). A review of the literature on general factor of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 765-771.
  • Klinkosz, W., Sękowski, A.E. (2008). Pięcioczynnikowy Model Osobowości a narzędzia pomiaru Wielkiej Piątki. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11(1), 142-152.
  • Krueger, R.F., Markon, K.E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based aproach to understanding and classifying psychopatology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111-133.
  • Lee, K., Ashton, M.C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
  • Lee, K., Ashton, M.C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality
  • Lee, K., Ashton, M.C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001-1053.
  • Markon, K.E., Krueger, R.F., Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139-157.
  • McAdams, D.P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
  • McCrae, R. (2009). The Physics and Chemistry of Personality. Theory Psychology, 19(5), 670-687.
  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (1985). Updating Norman’s “adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.
  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. W: J.S. Wiggins (red.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (s. 51-87). New York: Guilford Press.
  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. W: L.A. Pervin, O.P. John (red.), Handbook of personality (s. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press.
  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (2005). Osobowość człowieka dorosłego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
  • McCrae, R.R., Jang, K.L., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Yamagata, S., Riemann, R., Angleitner, ., Spinath, F.M. (2008). Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 442-455.
  • McCrae, R.R., John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
  • McCrae, R.R., Terracciano, A. & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547-561.
  • Mlacic, B. (2008). National taxonomies, adjective markers and inventories: three directions application of the lexical approach to personality. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11(1), 152-160.
  • Muncer, S.J. (2011). The general factor of personality: Evaluating the evidence from meta-analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and evolutionary theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 775-778.
  • Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence of the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213-1233.
  • Norman, W.T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
  • Nusbaum, E.C., Silvia, P.J. (2011). Are openness and intellect distinct aspects of openness to experience? A test of the O/I model. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 571-574.
  • Oleś, P. (2000). Kontrowersje wokół „Wielkiej Piątki”. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 7-18.
  • Paulhus, D.L., John, O.P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025-1060.
  • Peabody, D., De Raad, B. (2002). The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: a comparison across languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 983-997.
  • Peabody, D., Goldberg, L.R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from Rushton, J.P., Bons, T.A., Hur, Y.M. (2008). The genetics and evolution of general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173-1185.
  • Rushton, J.P., Bons, T.A., Ando, J., Hur, Y-M., Irwing, P., Vernon, P. A., Petrides, K.V., Barbaranelli, C. (2009). A general factor of personality from multitrait–multimethod data and cross-national twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, e, S. (2010). No evidence that social desirability response set explains the general factor of personality and its affective correlates. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13, 131-134.
  • Rushton, J.P., Irwing, P. (2008). A general factor of personality (GFP) from two metaanalyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and
  • Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679-683.
  • Rushton, J.P., Irving, P. (2009a). The general factor of personality in 16 sets of the Big Five, the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey, the California Psychological Inventory, and the Temperament and Character Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 558-564.
  • Rushton, J.P., Irwing, P. (2009b). A general factor of personality in the Comrey Personality Scales, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, and the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 437-442.
  • Rushton, J.P., Irwing, P. (2009c). A general factor of personality in the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III, the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology, and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, , P. (2009d). A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 571-576.
  • Rushton, J.P., Irving, P. (2011). The General Factor of Personality: normal and abnormal. W: T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, A. Furnham (red.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences, First Edition (s. 134-163). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Rushton, J.P., Irwing, P., Booth, T. (2010). A general factor of personality (GFP) in the personality disorders: Three studies of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13, 301-311.
  • Russell, J.A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
  • Saucier, G. (1992). Benchmarks: Integrating affective and interpersonal circles with the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1025-1035.
  • Saucier, G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296-1312.
  • Saucier, G. (2002). Gone to far – or not far enough? Comments on the article by Ashton and Lee. European Journal of Personality, 16, 55-62.
  • Saucier, G. (2003). Factor structure of English-language personality type nouns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 695-708.
  • Saucier, G. (2008). Measures of the personality factors found recurrently in human lexicons. W: G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, D.H. Saklofske (red.), The Sage Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment (t. 2, s. 29-54). Los Angeles-London-New Delhi-Singapore: SAGE Publication.
  • Saucier, G., Georgiades, S., Tsaousis, I., Goldberg, L.R. (2005). The factor structure of Greek personality adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 856-875.
  • Saucier, G., Goldberg, L.R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847-880.
  • Saucier, G., Goldberg, L.R. (2002). Assesing the Big Five: Application of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. W: B. De Raad, M. P erugini and Huber Publishers.
  • Saucier, G., Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical Subcomponents of the Big Five Personality Factors: A Cross-Language Replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613-627.
  • Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A.G., Payne, D.L., Carlson, R., Sanogo, L., Ole-Kotikash, L., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M.S., Somer, O., Szarota, P., Szirmak, Z., Zhou, H. Settles, R.E., Fischer, S., Cyders, M.A., Combs, J.L., Gunn, R.L., Smith, G.T. (2012). (1), 160-172.
  • Simsek, Ö.F. (2012). Higher-order factors of personality in self-report data: Self-esteem really matters. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 568-573.
  • Simsek, Ö.F., Koydemir, S., Schütz, A. (2012). A multigroup multitrait-multimethod study in two countries supports the validity of a two-factor higher order model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 442-449.
  • Siuta, J. (2006). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-PI-R Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R. McCrae. Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
  • Siuta, J. (red.) (2009). Diagnoza osobowości. Inwentarz NEO-PI-R w teorii i praktyce. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
  • Siuta, J., Beauvale, A. (2008). Wielka Piatka – problemy głównie stare. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11(1), 161-163.
  • Soto, C.J., John, P.H. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Strelau, J. (2006). Osobowość jako zespół cech. W: J. Strelau (red.), Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki (t. 2, s. 525-560). Gdańsk: GWP.
  • Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., Rowiński, T., Gasiul, H., Stillwell, D., Kosiński, M. (2013, lipiec). Factorial Structure of Personality as Measured by the IPIP-100 in 33 Countries. Referat wygłoszony na 12th European Conference on Psychological Assessment, San Sebastian, Hiszpania.
  • Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2011a). Kołowy model struktury cech osobowości w ujęciu Lewisa Goldberga. Studia Psychologica, 11(2), 65-93.
  • Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2011b, sierpień-wrzesień). Polish version of the IPIP scales for measuring Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex (AB5C). Plakat na 11th European Conference on Psychological Assessment, Ryga, Łotwa.
  • Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2014). Circumplex structure of personality traits measured with the IPIP-45AB5C questionnaire in Poland. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 77-82.
  • Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2014, w druku). Wielka Piątka – jeden model i różne narzędzia pomiaru.
  • Strus, W., Rowiński, T., Cieciuch, J. (2012, lipiec). Polish version of Big five Aspects Scales from International Personality Item Pool. Plakat na 16th European Conference on Personality, Triest, Włochy.
  • Szarota, P. (1995). Polska Lista Przymiotnikowa (PLP): narzędzie do diagnozy pięciu wielkich czynników osobowości. Studia Psychologiczne, 33, 227-255.
  • Szarota, P. (2008a). Wielka Piątka – stare problemy, nowe wątpliwości. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11, 127-138.
  • Szarota, P. (2008b). Patrząc w przyszłość. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11(1), 173-177.
  • Szarota, P., Ashton, M., Lee, K. (2007). Taxonomy and structure of the Polish personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 21, 823-852.
  • Szirmak, Z., De Raad, B. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95-117.
  • Trapnell, P.D., Wiggins, J.S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality (IASR-B5). Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 59, 781-790.
  • Trivers, R.L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
  • Tupes, E.C., Christal, R.C. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings.
  • Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.
  • Van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., Bakker, A.B. (2010). The General Factor of Personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315-327.
  • Van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., Cremers, M., van de Ven, C. (2011). General Factors of Personality in Six Datasets and a Criterion-Related Validity Study at the Netherlands Armed Forces International. Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(2), 157-169.
  • Van der Linden, D., Tsaousis, I., Petrides, K.V. (2012). Overlap between General Factors of Personality in the Big Five, Giant Three, and trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 175-179.
  • Veselka, L., Just, C., Jang, K.L., Johnson, A.M. Vernon, P.A. (2012). The General Factor of Personality: A critical test. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 261-264.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L.A. (1999). Emocje, nastroje, cechy i temperament: rozważania pojęciowe i wyniki badań. W: P. Ekman, R.J. Davidson (red.), Natura emocji (s. 83-87). Gdańsk: GWP.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 1063-1070.
  • Weisberg, Y.J., DeYoung, C.G., Hirsh, J.B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Personality Science and Individual Differences, 2(178), 1-11.
  • Wiggins, J.S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
  • Wiggins, J.S. (1980). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior. W: L. Wheeler (red.), Review of personality and social psychology (t. 1, s. 265-293). Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Wilson, E.O. (1988). O naturze ludzkiej. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
  • Wilson, E.O. (2000). Socjobiologia. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka Wydawnictwo.
  • Wright, A.G.C., Thomas, K.M., Hopwood, C.J., Markon, K.E., Pincus, A.L., Krueger, R.F. (2012, March 26). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(4), 951-957.
  • Yang, K.S., Bond, M.H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087-1095.
  • Yik, M. (2010). Affect and interpersonal behaviors: Where do the circumplexes meet? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 721-728.
  • Zawadzki, B. (2008). Status cech Wielkiej Piątki: czy tylko endogenne tendencje zachowania? Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11, 163-171.
  • Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J. (2010). Structure of personality: Search for a general factor viewed from a temperament perspective. Personality and individual differences, 49(2), 77-82.
  • Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P., Śliwińska, M. (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae: Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-2f520226-73b1-4b3a-bbc3-c0e1f55d077f
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.