Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 4 | 192-199
Article title

The comparison of selected lifestyle variables of first-year students at two universities in Košice

Title variants
Languages of publication
The objective of the presented paper was to compare the selected variables of lifestyle in first - year students at two universities in Košice. The research sample group consisted of the first - year students of the P. J. Šafá rik University in Košice (UPJŠ, n=918, 651 women and 267 men) and the Technical University in Košice (TUKE, n=653, 239 women and 414 men). We compiled our own test battery named “The risk factors of obesity and its prevention through physical activity” and administered it to students at the beginning of the respective academic years (September 2012 and September 2013). Presented paper focuses on questions related to: the students' satisfaction with their lifestyle, students expressing a need to change their lifestyle, frequency of structured physical activity, motivation to engage in structured physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and a structure of leisure activities. To process the collected data, we used the statistical software R. To test the signific ance of differences between the universities we used the Wilcoxon rank - sum test. N o significant difference between the universities was found on variables indicating the satisfaction with lifestyle. The most repeated lifestyle components that students of b oth universities would like to change were physical activity and dietary habits. These data reflect the findings that in the last half year over 61.5 % of UPJŠ students and 48.9 % of TUKE students were engaged in structured physical activity either irregul arly or they were not engaged in any structured physical activity at all. Another analysis of significant difference (p<0.001) between the two universities was employed to indicate the frequency with which students engaged in structured physical activity. The analysis revealed a higher frequency in students of TUKE. The analysis also confirmed that the gender of a respondent had a greater influence on that difference than the university they attended. The students of both universities indicated that figure (appearance), enjoyment, health and physical fitness were the main motivators for structured physical activity. The difference between the universities, with regard to variables indicating the time which students spent engaged in sedentary behaviours was s ignificant (p<0.001) during both working days and weekend days, where gender had no influence on this difference. Sedentary behaviours prevailed among the most common leisure activities in students of both universities. At the beginning of their university studies, lifestyle of a large number of first - year students at the two universities is characterized by the low level of engagement in structured physical activity and by sedentary leisure activities, with the existing differences between genders and the universities.

Physical description
  • Institute of Physical Education and Sport, University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Slovakia,
  • Institute of Physical Education and Sport, University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Slovakia
  • Faculty of Science, University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Slovakia
  • 1. Slepičková I: Sport a volný čas. Karolinum, 2005. ISBN 80-246-1039-6 [in Czech]
  • 2. Duffková J, Urban L, Dubský J. Sociologie životního stylu. 1. vyd. Plzeň: Aleš Čaněk, 2008. ISBN 978-80-7380-123-6 [in Czech]
  • 3. Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Precious E, Crombie IK, Smith WCS: Weight loss interventions in young people (18 to 25 year olds): a systematic review. In Obesity reviews, 2010; 11: 580-592
  • 4. Wengreen HJ, Moncur C: Change in diet, physical activity, and body weight among young-adults during transition from high school to college. In Nutrition Journal, 2009; 8:32
  • 5. Lloyd-Richardson EE, Bailey S, Fava JL, Wing R: Aprospective study of weight gain during the college freshman and sophomore years. In Preventive Medicine, 2009; 48: 256-261
  • 6. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016,
  • 7. Fountaine ChJ, Liguori GA, Mozumdar A, Schuna JM: Physical Activity and Screen Time Sedentary Behaviors in College Students. In International Journal of Exercise Science, 2011; 4(2): 102-112
  • 8. Kattelmann KK et al.: The Effects of Young Adults Eating and Active for Health (YEAH): A Theory-based Web-Delivered Intervention. In Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2014; 46(6): 27-41
  • 9. Valjent Z: Aktivní životní styl vysokoškoláků. 1. vyd. Praha: České vysoké učení technické, 2010. ISBN 978-80-01-04669-2 [in Czech]
  • 10. Sallis JF: Age-related decline in physical activity: a synthesis of human and animal studies. In Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2000; 32(9): 1598-600
  • 11. Buckworth J, Nigg C: Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sedentary Behavior in College Students. In Journal of American College Health, 2004; 53(1): 28-34
  • 12. Kjønniksen L, Fjørtoft I, Wold B: Attitude to physical education and participation in organized youth sports during adolescence related to physical activity in young adulthood: A 10-year longitudinal study. In European Physical Education Review, 2009; 15(2): 139-154
  • 13. Antala B et al.: Telesná a športová výchova v názoroch žiakov základných a stredných škôl. Bratislava. Národné športové centrum a Fakulta telesnej výchovy a športu Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave, 2012. ISBN 978-80-89324-09-5 [in Slovak]
  • 14. Rangul V, Bauman A, Holmen TL, Midthjell K: Is physical activity maintenance from adolescence to young adulthood associated with reduced CD risk factors, improved mental health and satisfaction with life: the HUNT Study, Norway. In International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2012; 9:144
  • 15. Wichstrøm L, Von Soest T, Kvalem IL: Predictors of growth and decline in leisure time physical activity from adolescence to adulthood. In Health Psychology, 2013; 32(7): 775-784
  • 16. Hendl J: Behaviorální intervence: plánování, implementace, evaluace. In: Hendl J, Dobrý L et al.: Zdravotní benefity pohybových aktivit. Monitorování, intervence, evaluace. Karolinum, 2011. ISBN 978-80-246-2000-8 [in Czech]
  • 17. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs. In: Bocarro JN and Kanters MA: Leisure, Health, and Physical Activity. In Dimensions of Leisure for Life. Individuals and Society. Human Kinetics, 2010. ISBN 0-7360-8288-3
  • 18. Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Clarke A, Smith WCS: Physical activity attitudes, intentions and behaviour among 18-25 year olds: a mixed method study. In BMC Public Health 2012, 12:640
  • 19. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. In Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 1982; 19(3): 276-288.
  • 20. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross J: In search of how people change. In American psychologist, 1992; 47(9): 1102-1114.
  • 21. Kilpatrick M, Hebert E, Bartholomew J: College Students’ Motivation for Physical Activity: Differentiating Men’s and Women’s Motives for Sport Participation and Exercise. In Journal of American College Health, 2005; 54(2): 87-94
  • 22. Batch BC et al.: Weight loss intervention for young adults using mobile technology: design and rationale of randomized controlled trial–Cell Phone Intervention for You (CITY). In Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2014; 37(2): 333-341
  • 23. Patrick K et al.: Design and implementation of randomized controlled social and mobile weight loss trial for young adults (project SMART). In Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2014; 37:10-18
  • 24.Zusková K, Buková A, Bakalár P, Brtková M, Küchelová Z, Hančová M: Nadhmotnosť a obezita u vysokoškolákov. Vybrané aspekty životného štýlu a psychiky. Univerzita P. J. Šafárika v Košiciach, 2015. ISBN 978-80-8152-389-2 [in Slovak]
  • 25. Kattelmann KK et al.: The Effects of Young Adults Eating and Active for Health (YEAH): A Theory-based Web-Delivered Intervention. In Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2014; 46(6): 27-41
  • 26. Deliens T, Deforche B, DeBourdeaudhuij I, Clarys P: Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. In BMC Public Health, 2015; 15:201
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.