Ultrasound imaging of the liver and bile ducts – expectations of a clinician

• Authors: Krzysztof Skoczylas , Andrzej Pawełas

Title variants

PL

Badanie ultrasonograficzne wątroby i dróg żółciowych – oczekiwania klinicysty

• Languages of publication: EN PL

Abstracts

EN

Since diseases of the liver and bile ducts are common, a clinician is faced by the need to implement an appropriate diagnostic process. It is necessary to apply diagnostic methods that enable appropriate assessment of the most common pathologies of the liver, i.e. fibrosis, steatosis and focal lesions, as well as initial assessment of the bile ducts. These goals can be achieved using ultrasound methods based on conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography and elastography. The assessment of fatty liver and bile duct dilatation using ultrasound reaches satisfactory levels of sensitivity and specificity. The usage of contrast agents enables unambiguous differentiation between benign and malignant focal lesions, frequently allowing them to be identified accurately without the assistance of other imaging modalities. Elastography has enabled reliable assessment of liver fibrosis. Its results are comparable to those of the standard method, i.e. liver biopsy.

PL

W związku z powszechnym występowaniem chorób wątroby i dróg żółciowych klinicysta stoi przed problemem wdrożenia odpowiedniej diagnostyki. Istnieje potrzeba stosowania metod diagnostycznych umożliwiających odpowiednią ocenę najczęstszych patologii wątroby, to jest włóknienia, stłuszczenia miąższu wątroby, różnicowania zmian ogniskowych, czy wstępną ocenę patologii dróg żółciowych. Na osiągnięcie tych celów pozwala zastosowanie metod ultrasonograficznych opartych na klasycznej ultrasonografii, ultrasonografii z wykorzystaniem kontrastów dożylnych i elastografii. Ultrasonograficzna ocena stłuszczenia wątroby i poszerzenia dróg żółciowych osiąga zadowalającą czułość i specyficzność. Zastosowanie kontrastów dożylnych pozwala na jednoznaczne różnicowanie między łagodnymi a złośliwymi zmianami ogniskowymi, często umożliwiając prawidłową ich identyfikację bez konieczności stosowania innych metod badań obrazowych. Zastosowanie metody elastografii umożliwiło wiarygodną ocenę włóknienia wątroby, z wynikami porównywalnymi do standardowej metody, jaką jest biopsja wątroby.

Keywords

EN

CEUS; bile ducts; drogi żółciowe; elastografia; elastography; fatty liver; stłuszczenie wątroby

Discipline

• MEDICINE: MEDICINE

• Publisher: Medical Communications
• Journal: Journal of Ultrasonography
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 62
• Pages: 292–306

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Skoczylas

• Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

author

Andrzej Pawełas

• Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

References

• Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K et al.: The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 2012; 55: 2005–2023.
• Schwenzer NF, Springer F, Schram C, Stefan N, Machann J, Schick F: Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. J Hepatol 2009; 51: 433-445.
• Sasso M, Miette V, Sandrin L, Beaugrand M: The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel tool for the non-invasive evaluation of steatosis using FibroScan. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2012; 36: 13–20.
• Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, Mc-Cullough AJ: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 1413–1419.
• Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S: Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 495–500.
• Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: Liver biopsy. Hepatology 2009; 49: 1017–1044.
• Tobari M, Hashimoto E, Yatsuji S, Torii N, Shiratori K: Imaging of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: advantages and pitfalls of ultrasonography and computed tomography. Intern Med 2009; 48: 739–746.
• Mehta SR, Thomas EL, Bell JD, Johnston DG, Taylor-Robinson SD: Non-invasive means of measuring hepatic fat content. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 3476–3483.
• Gerstenmaier JF, Gibson RN: Ultrasound in chronic liver disease. Insights Imaging 2014; 5: 441–455.
• Walas MK, Skoczylas K, Gierbliński I: Standards of the Polish Ultrasound Society – update. The liver, gallbladder and bile ducts examinations. J Ultrason 2012; 12: 428–445.
• Bohte AE, van Werven JR, Bipat S, Stoker J: The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 87–97.
• Borges VF, Diniz AL, Cotrim HP, Rocha HL, Andrade NB: Sonographic hepatorenal ratio: a noninvasive method to diagnose nonalcoholic steatosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2013; 41: 18–25.
• Marshall RH, Eissa M, Bluth EI, Gulotta PM, Davis NK: Hepatorenal index as an accurate, simple, and effective tool in screening for steatosis. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 997–1002.
• Martín-Rodríguez JL, Arrebola JP, Jiménez-Moleón JJ, Olea N, González-Calvin JL: Sonographic quantification of a hepato-renal index for the assessment of hepatic steatosis in comparison with 3T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 88–94.
• Shen F, Zheng RD, Mi TQ, Wang XY, Pan Q, Chen GY et al.: Controlled attenuation parameter for non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in Chinese patients. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4702–4711.
• Kim JK, Lee KS, Choi JR, Chung HJ, Jung da H, Lee KA et al.: Usefulness of the controlled attenuation parameter for detecting liver steatosis in health checkup examinees. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 405–410.
• Chon YE, Jung KS, Kim SU, Park JY, Park YN, Kim do Y et al.: Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for detection of hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic liver diseases: a prospective study of a native Korean population. Liver Int 2014; 34: 102–109.
• Marrero JA, Ahn J, Rajender Reddy K; American College of Gastroenterology: ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of focal liver lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1328–1347.
• Marin D, Furlan A, Federle MP, Midiri M, Brancatelli G: Imaging approach for evaluation of focal liver lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 624–634.
• Robinson PJ: Imaging liver metastases: current limitations and future prospects. Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 234–241.
• Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Wolf KJ: Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur J Radiol 2003; 46: 147–159.
• Larcos G, Sorokopud H, Berry G, Farrell GC et al.: Sonographic screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis: an evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 433–435.
• Karhunen PJ: Benign hepatic tumours and tumour like conditions in men. J Clin Pathol 1986; 39: 183–188.
• Leen E, Becker D, Bolondi L, Steinbach R, Weskott H, Stacul F et al.: Prospective, open-label, multi-centre study evaluating the accuracy of unenhanced versus SonoVue® enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of focal liver lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1–12.
• Harvey CJ, Albrecht T: Ultrasound of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1578–1593.
• Guang Y, Xie L, Ding H, Cai A, Huang Y: Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVue®-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrastenhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a metaanalysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2011; 137: 1595–1605.
• Torzilli G: Adverse effects associated with SonoVue use. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2005; 4: 399–401.
• Juszczyk J, Boron-Kaczmarska A, Cianciara J, Flisiak R, Gladysz A, Halota W et al.: Zalecenia terapeutyczne na rok 2013: leczenie przeciwwirusowe przewlekłego wirusowego zapalenia wątroby typu B. Przegl Epidemiol 2013; 67: 383–391.
• EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2015. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 199–236. Available from: www.easl.eu/medias/cpg/HEPC-2015/Full-report.pdf.
• Ellis EL, Mann DA: Clinical evidence for the regression of liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 1171–1180.
• Berzigotti A, Castera L: Update on ultrasound imaging of liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 2013; 59: 180-182.
• Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology: Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007; 46: 922–938.
• European Association for the Study of the Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: EASL-EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 1430.
• Choong CC, Venkatesh SK, Siew EP: Accuracy of routine clinical ultrasound for staging of liver fibrosis. J Clin Imaging Sci 2012; 2: 58.
• Colli A, Fraquelli M, Andreoletti M, Marino B, Zuccoli E, Conte D: Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection – analysis of 300 cases. Radiology 2003; 227: 89–94.
• KCS, Sharma D, Chataut SP: Hepatic vein waveforms in liver cirrhosis re-evaluated. Hepatol Int 2011; 5: 581–585.
• Bota S, Herkner H, Sporea I, Salzl P, Sirli R, Neghina AM et al.: Metaanalysis: ARFI elastography versus transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Liver Int 2013; 33: 1138–1147.
• Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B, Zicchetti M, Filice G, Filice C et al.: Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology 2012; 56: 2125–2133.
• Linguraru MG, Sandberg JK, Jones EC, Petrick N, Summers RM: Assessing hepatomegaly: automated volumetric analysis of the liver. Acad Radiol 2012; 19: 588–598.
• Talley NJ, O’Connor S: Clinical Examination: A Systematic Guide to Physical Diagnosis. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Sydney 2007.
• Douglas G, Nicol F, Robertson C: Macleod’s Clinical Examination. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh 2009.
• Tchelepi H, Ralls PW, Radin R, Grant E: Sonography of diffuse liver disease. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 1023–1032.
• Giorgio A, Amoroso P, Fico P, Lettieri G, Finelli L, de Stefano G et al.: Ultrasound evaluation of uncomplicated and complicated acute viral hepatitis. J Clin Ultrasound 1986; 14: 675–679.
• Krishnan M, Middleton WD: Ultrasonographic evaluation of right upper quadrant pain in emergency departments. Ultrasound Clin 2011; 6: 149–161.
• Yarmish GM, Smith MP, Rosen MP, Baker ME, Blake MA, Cash BD et al.: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria: RUQ Pain. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11: 316–322.
• Ahmed F, Fogel EL: Right upper quadrant pain and a normal abdominal ultrasound. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1198–1201.
• Yarmenitis SD: Ultrasound of the gallbladder and the biliary tree. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 270–282.
• Rubens DJ: Ultrasound imaging of the biliary tract. Ultrasound Clin 2007; 2: 391–413.
• Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Levine D (eds.): Diagnostic Ultrasound. Vol. 1, Mosby, St. Louis 2011.
• Hunt DR: Common bile duct stones in non-dilated bile ducts? An ultrasound study. Australas Radiol 1996; 40: 221–222.

• Document Type: review