As of 1 April 2026, the PSJD database will become an archive and will no longer accept new data.
Current publications from Polish scientific journals are available through the Library of Science: https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
System messages
  • Session was invalidated!
  • Session was invalidated!
2026 | 64 | 290-302

Article title

Comparison of the relevance of hysterosalpingography and ultrasonography in the management of infertility among women of reproductive age in Rivers State, Nigeria

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Studies have shown that women of childbearing age in sub-Saharan Africa who desire to have children are facing higher rates of secondary infertility compared to the global average. This study aims to evaluate the significance of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and ultrasonography (US) in the treatment of infertility among women of reproductive age in Rivers State, Nigeria, by examining the findings from HSG and US regarding the myometrium, endometrium, ovaries, and fallopian tubes of the participants. The study used a Mindray ultrasound machines, with transducers (probes) operating at frequencies of 3.5 MHz - 7 MHz and 5-12 MHz (3C5A and L13-3), along with ultrasound gel. Data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel version 16 and SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 22. The findings related to the endometrium indicate a moderate level of agreement between US and HSG. The discrepancies primarily occurred in instances where US identified focal intracavitary lesions that were not clearly visible on HSG, or where HSG indicated an irregular cavity contour without a corresponding discrete correlate on US. Additionally, myometrium findings demonstrated a fair to moderate level of agreement. US was found to be superior in identifying leiomyomas and features indicative of adenomyosis, while HSG only revealed abnormalities indirectly when the uterine cavity was distorted. The ovarian findings showed a poor level of agreement between US and HSG. US, particularly transvaginal ultrasound, effectively visualized ovarian morphology and detected functional cysts or masses, whereas HSG had minimal diagnostic value for ovarian pathology. There was a significant level of agreement between both imaging modalities in assessing fallopian tube patency or blockage, with HSG remaining the gold standard for evaluating tubal patency. In summary, US offered a more comprehensive evaluation of the endometrium, myometrium, and ovaries, while HSG proved to be the most effective for assessing fallopian tube patency. The complementary functions of these imaging methods underscore the importance of their incorporation in fertility assessments.

Year

Volume

64

Pages

290-302

Physical description

Contributors

  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

References

  • [1] World Health Organization (WHO). Infirtility. WHO Publication Geneva. Infertility. Geneva WHO. 2020
  • [2] Ekpor E, Brobbey SS, Kumah CY, Akyirem S. Experience of infertility-related stigma in Africa: a systematic review and mixed methods meta-synthesis. Int Health. 2025; 17(6): 903-913
  • [3] Gedef GM, Taye EB, Mohammed OY, Abegaz MY, Asratie MH, Andualem F. Prevalence of infertility and its risk factors in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contracept Reprod Med. 2025; 10(1): 73
  • [4] Kassie AT, Zegeye AF, Bazezew AM, Mamo EY, Gebru DM, Tamir TT. Determinants of pressure to conceive among reproductive age women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis of recent Demographic and Health Surveys in five countries. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025; 5(2): e0004244
  • [5] Esan DT, Nnamani KQ, Ogunkorode A, Muhammad F, Oluwagbemi OO, Ramos CG. Infertility affects the quality of life of Southwestern Nigerian women and their partners. Int. J. Afr. Nurs. Sci. 2022; 17: 100506
  • [6] Carson SA, Kallen AN. Diagnosis and Management of Infertility: A Review. JAMA 326 (2021) 65-76
  • [7] Adedigba JA, Idowu BM, Hermans SP, Ibitoye BO, Fawole OA. The relationship between hysterosalpingography findings and female infertility in a Nigerian population. Pol J Radiol. 2020; 85, e188-e195
  • [8] Jimah BB, Gorleku P, Baffour Appiah A. Hysterosalpingography Findings and Jimah Ratio of the Uterine Cavity in Women with Infertility in Central Region, Ghana. Radiol Res Pract. 2020; 2020: 6697653
  • [9] Okafor CO, Okafor CI, Okpala OC, Umeh E. The pattern of hysterosalpingographic findings in women being investigated for infertility in Nnewi, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010, 13(3), 264-7
  • [10] Ombelet W, Onofre J. IVF in Africa: what is it all about? Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019; 11(1): 65-76
  • [11] Larsen U, Hollos M, Obono O, Whitehouse B. Suffering infertility: the impact of infertility on women's life experiences in two Nigerian communities. J Biosoc Sci. 2010; 42(6): 787-814
  • [12] Schankath AC, Fasching N, Urech-Ruh C, Hohl MK, Kubik-Huch RA. Hysterosalpingography in the workup of female infertility: indications, technique and diagnostic findings. Insights Imaging. 2012; 3(5): 475-83
  • [13] Toufig H, Benameur T, Twfieg ME, Omer H, El-Musharaf T. Evaluation of hysterosalpingographic findings among patients presenting with infertility. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020; 27(11): 2876-2882
  • [14] Panchal, Sonal; Nagori, Chaitanya. Imaging techniques for assessment of tubal status. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2014; 7(1):2-12
  • [15] Ottun AT, Olumodeji AM, Ayanbode O, Ogunyemi AA, Jinadu FO, Adewunmi AA. Outcomes and complications of pre-assisted reproductive technology hysteroscopic evaluation and treatment: a cross-sectional study at a Nigerian teaching hospital. Contracept Reprod Med. 2025; 10(1): 37
  • [16] Xydias EM, Emmanouil V, Koutini M, Ntanika A, Tsakos E, Prior M, Sarris I, Thanasas I, Daponte A, Ziogas AC. Comparison of HyFoSy, HyCoSy and X-Ray Hysterosalpingography in the Assessment of Tubal Patency in Women with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci (Basel) 2025; 13(3): 168
  • [17] Kondagari L, Kahn J, Singh M. Sonography Gynecology Infertility Assessment, Protocols, and Interpretation. StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  • [18] Karena ZV, Mehta AD. Sonography Female Pelvic Pathology Assessment, Protocols, and Interpretation. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), 2023.
  • [19] Okonkwo IO, Eleje GU, Obiechina NJ, Ugboaja JO, Okafor CO, Mbachu II, Obiagwu HI, Okwuosa AO, Onwusulu DN, Okeke CF, Ofojebe CJ, Okafor CC, Ogabido CA, Olisa CL, Okafor CG. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography in the detection of uterine cavity pathologies among infertile women. Acta Radiol Open. 2024; 13(5): 20584601241252335
  • [20] Muhammad ID, Sabo US, Ibrahim SA, Labaran AD, Takai IU. Comparative Study Between Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography and Hysterosalpingography in Evaluating Tubal Patency at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano. Niger Med J. 2023; 64(5): 671-679
  • [21] Phillips CH, Benson CB, Ginsburg ES. et al. Comparison of uterine and tubal pathology identified by transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography, and hysteroscopy in female patients with infertility. Fertil Res and Pract 1, 20 (2015)
  • [22] Kaveh M, Sadegi K, Salarzaei M, Parooei F. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysteroscopy in evaluating the endometrial polyps in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020; 15(3): 403-415
  • [23] Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73(2): 406-411
  • [24] ACOG Committee Opinion No. 734: The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Evaluating the Endometrium of Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131(5): e124-e129
  • [25] The Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135(3): e138-e148
  • [26] Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021; 115(5): 1143-1150
  • [27] Okeke TC, Agwuna KK, Eenyeaku CC and Ikeako LC. Application of ultrasonography in female infertility: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Reproductive Contraceptive and Obstetric Gynecology 2015; 4(5): 1246-1256
  • [28] G M, M S. Comparative Analysis of Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Findings in Infertility Evaluation. Cureus. 2025, 17(4): e81789

Document Type

article

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.psjd-116523fa-cc03-4c43-a77b-2e923dc220b5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.