Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 124 | 2 | 279-291
Article title

Biologically Localized Merge of Topics in Mandarin Chinese

Title variants
Languages of publication
The present article is devoted to the study of the biological localization of merging topics in Mandarin Chinese. The canonical topic structures in Chinese can be classified into 2 types: scrambling topic structures and left dislocated topic structures. In the first type, the topic is moved from its original position of an object or an adjunct to the spec CP position of the sentence; while in the second type, the topic is base generated in the spec CP position. The displaced topic is internally merged with its comment and the base generated topic is externally merged with its comment. Both logical possibilities of merge are localized laterally in BA 44.
Physical description
  • English Department, School of Humanities, Tianjin Polytechnic University 399#, West Binshui Road, Xiqing Area, Tianjin City, China
  • [1] Li, C. N. and Thompson, S. A. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. (1976) 457-489.
  • [2] Li, C. N. and Thompson, S. A. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley, University of California press, 1981.
  • [3] Jiang Zixin. A constraint on topic in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics18 (1991) 231-260
  • [4] Shi Dingxu. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76 (2000) 383-408
  • [5] Xu Liejiong and D. T. Langendoen. Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61 (1985) 1-27
  • [6] Yuan Yulin. Topicalization and the related grammatical processes in Chinese. Chinese Linguistics 253 (1996) 241-159
  • [7] Ma, Daoshan. Biologically localized merge of topics in Shandong Dialect, Russian Linguistic Bulletin 17 1(2019) 8-18
  • [8] Boeckx, C. Merge: Biolinguistic Considerations. English Linguistics 30 2( 2013) 463-484
  • [9] Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1995.
  • [10] Chomsky, Noam. Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland and H.-M. Gärtner, (eds.) Interfaces + Recursion =Languages? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, (2007) 1-29.
  • [11] Chomsky, Noam. The Minimalist Program, Beijing: Foreign Languages Teaching and Research Press. 2008.
  • [12] Chomsky,Noam. Problems of projection. Lingua, 130 (2013) 33-49
  • [13] Berwick, Robert, C. and Noam Chomsky. Why only us: recent questions and answers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43 (2017) 166-177
  • [14] Everaert, Martin B. H., Marinus A. C, Huybregts, Noam Chomsky, Robert C. Berwick, & Johan J. Bolhuis. Structures, not strings: Linguistics as part of the cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol 19, No. 12 (2015) 729-743
  • [15] Ma, Daoshan. Biologically based universality of merge in wh-questions. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature Vol. 1, Issue 3 (Sept-Oct, 2018) 58-67
  • [16] Ma, Daoshan. An introduction to linguistics. Shantou: Shantou University Press. 2018.
  • [17] Zaccarella, E. and A. D. Friederici. The neurobiological nature of syntactic hierarchies. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, Vol 81, Part B, (2017) 205-212
  • [18] Ma, Daoshan. Biologically relevant universality of move F in wh-questions. Open Access Library Journal, 5(3) (2018) 1-10
  • [19] Berwick, Robert, C. and Noam Chomsky. Why only us: language and evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2016.
  • [20] Perani, Daniela, Maria C. Saccumanna, Paola Scifo, Alfred Anwander, Danilo Spada, Cristina Baldolib, Antonella Poloniato, Gabriele Lohmann, and Angela D. Friederici. Neural Language Networks at Birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (38) (2011) 16056-16061
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.