PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2018 | 103 | 208-221
Article title

Functioning of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) on the example of a Częstochowa Municipal Company

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The subject of consideration of the following study is the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme, as a tool for managing a company focused on sustainable development. EMAS is an element of the management system in waste management companies, which is in response to the guidelines and regulations of the European Union. The following considerations are devoted to the functioning of the EMAS system at the Częstochowa Municipal Company, and the analysis of the environmental performance of the enterprise as a waste management company focused on achieving economic, ecological and social goals.
Year
Volume
103
Pages
208-221
Physical description
Contributors
  • Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa, Poland
References
  • [1] Hall, Jeremy K., Gregory A. Daneke, and Michael J. Lenox. Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing 25.5 (2010) 439-448.
  • [2] Kemp, René, Derk Loorbach, and Jan Rotmans. Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 14.1 (2007) 78-91.
  • [3] Folke, Carl, et al. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment 31.5 (2002) 437-440.
  • [4] Schneider, François, Giorgos Kallis, and Joan Martinez-Alier. Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of cleaner production 18.6 (2010) 511-518.
  • [5] Baker, Susan. Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernisation in the European Union. Environmental politics 16.2 (2007) 297-317.
  • [6] Rennings, Klaus, et al. The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics 57.1 (2006) 45-59.
  • [7] Morrissey, Anne J., and John Browne. Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste management 24.3 (2004) 297-308.
  • [8] Robèrt, K-H., et al. Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner production 10.3 (2002) 197-214.
  • [9] Fraser, Evan DG, et al. Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of environmental management 78.2 (2006) 114-127.
  • [10] Delmas, Magali A. The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences 35.1 (2002) 91-119.
  • [11] Morrow, David, and Dennis Rondinelli. Adopting corporate environmental management systems: Motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. European management journal 20.2 (2002) 159-171.
  • [12] Iraldo, Fabio, Francesco Testa, and Marco Frey. Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production 17.16 (2009) 1444-1452.
  • [13] Malek, Tanja, and Annette E. Toller. The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) Regulation. European Union Environmental Policy and New Forms of Governance. A Study of the Implementation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive and the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme Regulation in three Member States (2001) 43-55.
  • [14] Mazzanti, Massimiliano, and Roberto Zoboli. Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness: Evidence on decoupling from the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52.10 (2008) 1221-1234.
  • [15] European Parliament and Council Resolution (EC) No. 1221/2009 of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation of the organisation in the Eco-Management and Audit System (EMAS), invalidating the resolution (EC) No. 761/2001 and Committee's decisions 2001/681/WE and 2006/193/EC.
  • [16] Szyszka, Beata, and Alina Matuszak-Flejszman. EMAS in Poland: Performance, Effectiveness, and Future Perspectives. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 26.2 (2017).
  • [17] Azapagic, Adisa, and Slobodan Perdan. Indicators of sustainable development for industry: a general framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 78.4 (2000) 243-261.
  • [18] Tourais, Patrícia, and Nuno Videira. Why, how and what do organizations achieve with the implementation of environmental management Systems?—Lessons from a comprehensive review on the eco-management and audit scheme. Sustainability 8.3 (2016) 283-308.
  • [19] Wenk, Michael S. The European Union's eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS). Vol. 16. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
  • [20] Balve, P., H-H. Wiendahl, and E. Westkämper. Order management in transformable business structures—basics and concepts. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 17.6 (2001) 461-468.
  • [21] Rowland-Jones, Rhys, Meinwen Pryde, and Malcolm Cresser. An evaluation of current environmental management systems as indicators of environmental performance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 16.3 (2005) 211-219.
  • [22] Matuszak-Flejszman, A. Benefits of Environmental Management System compliant with ISO 14001 standard in Polish companies. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 3 (2009).
  • [23] Pedersen, Esben Rahbek. Perceptions of performance: how European organizations experience EMAS registration. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14.2 (2007) 61-73.
  • [24] Jasch, Christine. Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 8.1 (2000) 79-88.
  • [25] Neugebauer, Friederike. EMAS and ISO 14001 in the German industry–complements or substitutes? Journal of Cleaner Production 37 (2012): 249-256.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-108ceb75-5fdf-46ef-9849-f3d440bcd83c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.