Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 131 | 207-221
Article title

Local people dependency and stakeholder’s involvement for sustainable management of Chilmo forest

Title variants
Languages of publication
Site and situation specific assessments of ecosystem services are crucial to sustainably conserve and manage the Chilmo forest. In this specific study, an attempt has been made to identify how local communities depend on Ecosystem services and on other stakeholders involved in sustainable forest management. The study triangulated primary data collection methods such as field observations, household surveys and key informant interviews. Secondary data was also used to support and verify the primary data. SPSS version 20 software and Microsoft excel were then applied to describe the socioeconomic characteristics of the study population’s households. Data collected through discussions and observations was analyzed qualitatively. Four forest ecosystem services (provisioning, regulating, habitat and cultural services) were identified in the study area. Even though agriculture is the main economic activities, sample respondents earn money from diverse sources such as from homestead, wood lots, honey production, petty trade and from the selling of timber and non -timber forest products, from forest dividends and other forest related employment. Chilmo forest, on average, contributes more than a third of total annual income of the sample households. Surprisingly, almost all sample respondents participate in fuel wood collection, both for household consumption and market. Similarly, fuel wood collection generates the highest income, compared to other activities, because fuel wood is the sole source of energy in the study area. Therefore, provisioning services are the main source of livelihood and subsistence incomes for local communities. The findings greatly contribute towards the management of the Chilmo forest and will be used as input for further valuation work.
Physical description
  • Central Ethiopia Environment and Forest Research Center, Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute, P. O. Box 30708, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • [1] Abson, David J., and Jan Hanspach. Response to Turnhout et al.’s rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with. Conservation Letters 7, no. 3 (2014) 334-335
  • [2] Bekele, Tamrat. Phytosociology and ecology of a humid Afromontane forest on the central plateau of Ethiopia. Journal of Vegetation Science 5, no. 1 (1994) 87-98
  • [3] Bishaw, Badege. Deforestation and land degradation in the Ethiopian highlands: a strategy for physical recovery. Northeast African Studies (2001) 7-25
  • [4] Cohen-Shacham, Emmanuelle, Tamar Dayan, Rudolf de Groot, Coralie Beltrame, Fanny Guillet, and Eran Feitelson. Using the ecosystem services concept to analyse stakeholder involvement in wetland management. Wetlands Ecology and Management 23, no. 2 (2015) 241-256
  • [5] Costanza, Robert, Rudolf de Groot, Paul Sutton, Sander Van der Ploeg, Sharolyn J. Anderson, Ida Kubiszewski, Stephen Farber, and R. Kerry Turner. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26 (2014) 152-158
  • [6] Deal, Robert L., Bobby Cochran, and Gina LaRocco. Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 17 (2012) 69-76
  • [7] De Groot, Rudolf S., Rob Alkemade, Leon Braat, Lars Hein, and Louise Willemen. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7, no. 3 (2010) 260-272
  • [8] Engida, Tadesse Getacher, and Alemtsihay Jimma Teshoma. The socio economic effects of community forest management: evidence from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Int. Aff. Glob. Strategy 4 (2012) 15-22
  • [9] Förster, Johannes, Jan Barkmann, Roman Fricke, Stefan Hotes, Michael Kleyer, Susanne Kobbe, Daniel Kübler et al. Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach. Ecology and Society 20, no. 3 (2015) 1-19
  • [10] Friis, I. Forest and Forest Trees of Northeast Tropical Africa. Kew Bulletin Additional Series 15 (1992) 1-396
  • [11] Gatiso, Tsegaye Tagesse, and Tesfamicheal Wossen. "Forest dependence and income inequality in rural Ethiopia: evidence from Chilimo-Gaji community forest users." International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 22, no. 1 (2015): 14-24.
  • [12] Gwavuya, S. G., S. Abele, I. Barfuss, M. Zeller, and J. Müller. Household energy economics in rural Ethiopia: A cost-benefit analysis of biogas energy. Renewable Energy 48 (2012) 202-209
  • [13] Hein, Lars, Kris Van Koppen, Rudolf S. De Groot, and Ekko C. Van Ierland. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological economics 57, no. 2 (2006) 209-228
  • [14] Kindu, Mengistie, Thomas Schneider, Demel Teketay, and Thomas Knoke. Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa–Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Science of the Total Environment 547 (2016) 137-147
  • [15] Patterson, Trista M., and Dana L. Coelho. Ecosystem services: Foundations, opportunities, and challenges for the forest products sector. Forest Ecology and Management 257, no. 8 (2009) 1637-1646
  • [16] Reed, Mark S., Anil Graves, Norman Dandy, Helena Posthumus, Klaus Hubacek, Joe Morris, Christina Prell, Claire H. Quinn, and Lindsay C. Stringer. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of environmental management 90, no. 5 (2009) 1933-1949
  • [17] Soromessa, Teshome, and Ensermu Kelbessa. Interplay of regeneration, structure and uses of some woody species in Chilimo Forest, Central Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal 3, no. 1 (2014) 90-100
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.