Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 136 | 1-21
Article title

Bird communities of old pine coniferous forests and the characteristics of their microhabitats in pine forests at least 160 years old

Title variants
Languages of publication
This paper presents the results of a study of bird populations connected with the oldest forest stands of pine coniferous forests in Kampinoska Forest, where the pine trees are minimum 160 years old. It presents the basic results concerning the distribution, selectiveness and habitat preferences of hole-nesters and the birds connected with old forests in connection with habitat characteristics. The studied areas were dominated by hole-nesters, and a significant share was of birds connected with gaps left after broken trees. A large group was made up by birds which collect invertebrates among trees and then the species which feed on trunks and branches. Large dimensions of pine trees and numerous cracks in bark, cracks in trunks and hollows under windfallen tress served as microhabitats for particular bird species. The index of species diversity and number of pairs were similar in every area, probably due to dozens of years of forest protection, thanks to which similar quantity and quality parameters developed in the areas.
Physical description
  • Kampinos National Park, 38 Tetmajera Str., 05-080 Izabelin, Poland
  • [1] Adamík P., Hornan M. 2004. Foraging ecology of two bark foraging passerine birds in an old-growth temperate forest. Ornis Fennica, 81: 13-22.
  • [2] Andersson J., Domingo Gómez E., Michon S., Roberge J-M. 2017. Tree cavity densities and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 233-244.
  • [3] Basile M., Balestrieri R., de Groot M., Flajšman K., Posillico M. 2016. Conservation of birds as a function of forestry. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 11, 1: 42-48.
  • [4] Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. 1992. Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London, UK, p. 257.
  • [5] Blake J. G., Hoppes W.G. 1986. Influence of resouce abudance on use of tree-fall gaps by birds in an isolated woodlot. Auk, 103: 328-340.
  • [6] Brambilla M., Bassi E., Bergero V., Casale F., Chemollo M., Falco R., Longoni V., Saporetti F., Vigano E., Vitulano S. 2013. Modelling distribution and potential overlap between Boreal Owl Aegolius funereus and Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius: implications for management and monitoring plans. Bird Conservation International, 23, 4: 502-511
  • [7] Czeszczewik D., Walankiewicz W. 2016. Ecology and biology of birds in the Białowieża Forest: a 40-year perspective. Forest Research Papers, 77, 4: 332-340
  • [8] Czeszczewik D., Zub K., Stanski T., Sahel M., Kapusta A. Walankiewicz W. 2015. Effects of forest management on bird assemblages in the Bialowieza Forest, Poland. iForest, 8: 377-385.
  • [9] Edenius L., Elmberg J. 1996. Landscape level effects of modern forestry on bird communities in North Swedish boreal forests. Landscape Ecology, 11, 6: 325-338.
  • [10] Fraixedas S., Lindén A., Lehikoinen A. 2015. Population trends of common breeding forest birdsin southern Finland are consistent with trends in forest management and climate change. Ornis Fennica, 92: 187-203.
  • [11] Fuller R. J. 2000. Influence of treefall gaps on distributions of breeding birds within interior old-growth stands in Bialowieza Forest, Poland. The Condor, 102: 267-274.
  • [12] Garmendia A., Carcamo S., Schwendtner O. 2006. Forest management considerations for conservation of Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius and White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos populations in Quinto Real (Spanish Western Pyrenees). Biodiversity and Conservation, 15: 1399-1415
  • [13] Hill D., Taylor S., Thaxton R., Amphlet A. Horn W. 1990. Breeding bird communities of native pine forest, Scotland. Bird Study, 37, 2: 133-141.
  • [14] Hinsley S. A., Bellamy P. E., Newton I., Sparks T. H. 1995. Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. Journal of Avian Biology, 26: 94-104.
  • [15] Jäntti A., Hakkarainen H., Kuitunen M., Suhonen J. 2007. The importance of landscape structure for nest defence in the Eurasian Treecreeper Certhia familiaris. Ornis Fennica, 84: 145-154.
  • [16] Jokimäki J. Solonen T. 2011. Habitat associations of old forest bird species in managed boreal forests characterized by forest inventory data. Ornis Fennica, 88: 57-70.
  • [17] McAleece N., Gage J.D.G., Lambshead P.J.D., Paterso, G.L.J. 1997. BioDiversity Professional statistics analysis software. Jointly developed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum London.
  • [18] Pasinelli G. 2000. Oaks (Quercus sp.) and only oaks? Relations between habitat structure and home range size of the middle spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos medius). Biological Conservation, 93: 227-235.
  • [19] Pepłowska-Marczak D. 2009. The role of group cutting in the preservation of species diversity of forest birds. Proceedings of the Center for Nature and Forestry Education in Rogow, 21: 84-90.
  • [20] Pepłowska-Marczak D. 2018. Description and characteristic of bird species inhabiting dry coniferous forests exceeding 150 years of age in Kampinos National Park. World Scientific News, 92, 2: 155-170.
  • [21] Pirovano A., Zecca G. 2014. Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius habitat selection in the Italian Alps: implications for conservation in Natura 2000 network. Bird Conservation International, 24: 299-315.
  • [22] Raivio S., Haila Y. 1990. Birds assemblages in silvicultural habitat mosaics in southern Finland during the breeding season. Ornis Fennica, 67: 73-83.
  • [23] Rąkowski G., Czarnocki K., Ukalska J. 2016. Breeding avifauna of mature forest stands in the Borki Forest and its dynamics at the turn of the 21st century. Forest Research Papers, 77, 3: 239–255.
  • [24] Report of forest management data and for forecasts.
  • [25] Roberge J-M. Angelstam P. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation biology, 18, 1: 76-85.
  • [26] Sławski M. 2011. Changes of Pine stand structure versus birds' occurrence. Proceedings of the Center for Nature and Forestry Education in Rogow, 13: 219-228.
  • [27] Snow D.W., Perrins C.M. 1998. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Concise Edition. Oxford University Press. Vol. 2: 1414-1415.
  • [28] Solonen T. 1994. Structure and dynamic of the Finnish avifauna. Memoranda Societatis pro. Fauna et Flora Fennica, 70: 1-22.
  • [29] Summers R. W. 2004. Use of pine snags by birds in different stand types of Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris. Bird Study, 51, 3: 212-221.
  • [30] Tomiałojć L. 1980. The combined version of the mapping method. Ornis Polonica, 21: 33-54.
  • [31] Virkkala R., Rajasärkkä A., Väisänen R.A., Vickholm M., Virolainen E.1994. Conservation value of nature reserves: do hole-nesting birds prefer protected forest in southern Finland? Annales Zoologici Fennici, 31: 173-186.
  • [32] Walankiewicz W, Czeszczewik D, Mitrus C. 2007. Natural nest sites of the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis in lime-hornbeam-oak stands of a primeval forest. Ornis Fennica, 84: 155-162.
  • [33] Waterhouse F.L, Harestad A.S., Ott P.K. 2002. Use of small streams and forest gaps for breeding habitats by winter wrens in coastal British Columbia. Northwest Science, 76: 335-346
  • [34] Wesołowski T. 1982. The breeding ecology and behaviour of Wrens Troglodytes troglodytes under primeval and secondary conditions. Ibis, 125: 499-515.
  • [35] Wesołowski T., Czeszczewik D., Hebda G., Maziarz M., Mitrus C. Rowiński P. 2015. 40 years of breeding bird community dynamics in a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 50: 95-120
  • [36] Wesołowski T., Mitrus C., Czeszczewik D. Rowiński P. 2010. Breeding bird dynamics in a primeval temperate forest over thirty-five years: variation and stability in the changing world. Acta Ornithologica, 45: 209-232.
  • [37] Zielony R. 2004. The forests of the Kampinoski National Park in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. In: Andrzejewski R. (eds.), Kampinoski National Park, Izabelin, 111-144.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.