Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 124 | 2 | 107-118
Article title

Willingness to Pay for Recreational Parks in Addis Ababa: An Empirical Investigation of the Application of Multivariate Analysis

Title variants
Languages of publication
Willingness to pay is the maximum price at or below which a visitor will definitely buy one unit of product. This study examines the willingness to pay for recreational park services of two parks in Addis Ababa and to determine the attributes of willingness to pay of the recreational parks. The data were collected from a sample of 180 visitors in Addis Ababa recreational parks. The multivariate regression results obtained from this study indicated that travel costs, visitor’s income, and the number of years a visitor know the recreational parks were important determinants factors of the WTP of the sample visitors of Addis Ababa recreational parks. The coefficient of travel cost is negative and significant implying that an increase in travel cost reduces the number of visits of the site. Similarly, the coefficient of income variable is positive and significant implying that the demand for recreation increases as visitor’s income increases. The attractiveness and shortcoming of the recreational parks are identified in order to suggest for improvements of services to visitors. As the economic growth and awareness of the people increase, people will demand for better services and facilities or else willingness to pay will be affected. Thus, it is important for the private and public recreational parks to upgrade their services and facilities over time to fulfill the needs of the people.
Physical description
  • Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • [1] Abala, D. A Theoretical and empirical investigation of the willingness to pay for recreational services: A case study of Nairobi National Park. Eastern Economic Review 3 (1987) 271-292
  • [2] Alberini, A. Efficiency vs. Bias of Willingness-to-estimates Bivariate and Internal- Data Models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (1995) 169-180
  • [3] Amiran, G. Willingness to Pay (WTP). Paper presented at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (2002).
  • [4] Chung, J., Kyle, G., Petrick, J., & Absher, J. Fairness of prices, user fee policy and willingness to pay among visitors to a national forest. Tourism Management 32 (2011) 1038-1046
  • [5] Cesario, F.J. Value of Time Recreation Benefit Studies. Land Economics, 1 (1976).
  • [6] Clark, T. Urban amenities: lakes, opera, and juice bars do they drive development? Research in Urban Policy 9 (2003) 103-140
  • [7] Clawson, M., & Jack, K. Economics of outdoor recreation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1996).
  • [8] Creel, M., & Loomis, J. Confidence intervals for welfare measures with application to a problem of truncated counts. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73 (1991) 370-373
  • [9] Davis, D., & Tisdell, C. Tourist levies and willingness-to-pay for a whale shark experience. Tourism Economics, 5(2) (1998) 161-174
  • [10] Grandstaff, S. & Dixon, J. Evaluation of Lumpinee park in Bangkok, Thailand. In J.A. Dixon and M.M. Hufschmidt (eds) Economic Valuation Techniques for the Environment: A case study workbook. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press (1986).
  • [11] Hanemann, W. Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How much can they differ? The economics of the environment. Cambridge University Press, (1994) 471-483
  • [12] Hanker, N. Willingness to Pay for Borivli National Park: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation. Ecological Economics (1997) 105-122
  • [13] Hellerstein, D. Using count data models in travel cost analysis with aggregate data. American Agricultural Economics Association 73 (1991) 860-867
  • [14] Hellerstein, D., & R. Mendelsohn, R. A theoretical foundation for count Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75 (1993) 604-611
  • [15] Kaosaard, M., Patmasiriwat, D., Panayotou, T. & Deshazo, J. Green financing: Valuation and financing of Khao Yai National Park in Thailand. Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok (1995).
  • [16] Keske, C., Lohman, G., & Loomis, J. Do respondents report willingness to pay on a per person or per group basis? A mountain recreation example. Tourism Economics, 19 (1) (2013) 133-145
  • [17] Khan, H. Willingness to pay for Margalla Hills National Park: Evidence from the travel cost method. The Lahore Journal of Economics 11, 2 (2006) 43-70
  • [18] Khan, H. Willingness to pay and demand elasticities for two National Parks: Empirical evidence from two surveys in Pakistan. Environment, Development & Sustainability (2007).
  • [19] Kyle, G., Absher, J., & Graefe, A. The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences. Leisure Sciences 25 (2003) 33-50
  • [20] Malekiyan, M. Estimating recreational value of visitors’ WTP of Mountain Park of Seffeh in Isfahan. Economy of Natural Resources 1(1) (2012) 95-107
  • [21] Marine Le Gall-Ely. Definition, Measurement and Determinants of the Consumer’s Willingness to Pay:a Critical Synthesis and Directions for Further Research. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition), SAGE Publications, 2009, 24 (2), pp. 91-113.
  • [22] Monroe, K. Pricing: Making profitable decisions. McGraw-Hill Irwin, 3rd Edition (2003).
  • [23] Moore, R., Bishop, R., Provencher, B., & Champ, P. Accounting for respondent uncertainty to improve willingness to pay estimates. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58 (2010) 381-401
  • [24] Nagle, T., & Holden, R. The strategy and tactics of pricing. – Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall (2002).
  • [25] Reynisdottir, M., Song, H, Agrusa, J. Willingness to Pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tourism Management, 29 (2008) 1076-1083
  • [26] Rosenberger, R., Needham, M., Morzillo, A. & Moehrke, C. Attitudes, willingness to pay, and stated values for recreation use fees at an urban proximate forest. Journal of Forest Economics, 18 (2012) 271-281
  • [27] Tversky, A. Elimination-by-Aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review 79 (4) (1972) 281-292
  • [28] Williams, D., Vogt, C., & Vitterso, J. Structural equation modeling of users' response to wilderness recreation fees. Journal of Leisure Research 31 (1999) 245-268.
  • [29] Yeoman, J. Ecotourism and sustainable development. Who owns paradise? Tourism Management, 22 (2001) 203-212
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.