Examination of relationships between communication satisfaction and organizational identification of sport science students

• Authors: Özden Tepeköylü Öztürk , Mümine Soytürk
• Languages of publication: EN

Keywords

Organizational communication; interpersonal communication; communication satisfaction; identification; undergraduate student

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 89
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-10

Contributors

author

Özden Tepeköylü Öztürk

• Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

author

Mümine Soytürk

• Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey

References

• Akın, A., Yalnız, A., & Kazaz, N. (2015). Turkish version of abbreviated student communıcatıon satisfaction scale: The study of validity and reliability. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 17–24.
• Ashforth, B.E & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
• Bamber, E.M. & Iyer, V. (2002). Big 5 auditors’ professional and organizational identification auditing. A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(2), 21–38.
• Çakınberk, A., Derin, N., & Demirel, E.T. (2011). Shaping of organizational identification by organizational commitment: Example of private education institutions in Malatya and Tunceli. Journal of Business Research, 3(1), 89–121.
• Carriere, J. & Bourque, C. (2009). The effects of organizational communication on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in a land ambulance service and the mediating role of communication satisfaction. Career Development International, 14(1), 29–49.
• Cüceloğlu, D. (2006). Yeniden İnsan İnsana (35th ed.). Istanbul, Turkey: Remzi Kitapevi.
• Derin, N. & Tuna, H. (2017). The effect of communication satisfaction on organizational identification at academic organization. Journal of Selcuk Communication, 9(4), 119–128.
• Dökmen, Ü. (2004). İletişim Çaltışmaları ve Empati (23rd ed.). Istanbul, Turkey: Sistem Yayıncılık.
• Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M., & Harquail, C.V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.
• Finn, J.D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
• Goodboy, A.K., Martin, M.M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58(3), 372–396.
• Görür, D. (2001). A study of high school students’ evaluations of their communication skills with respect to some variables. Master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, Adana, Turkey.
• Gülnar, B. (2007). Organizational communication and communication satisfaction as a means of job satisfaction for research assistants: A comparison between public and private universities. Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk University, Institute of Social Sciences, Konya, Turkey.
• Hall, D.T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H.T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 176–190.
• Hecht, M.L. (1978a). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4(3), 253–264.
• Hecht, M.L. (1978b). Measures of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4(4), 350–368.
• Henderson, R.R. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior, communication, and the relationship to student achievement and school size. Northern Arizona University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: 3562135.
• Kandlousi, N.S., Ali, A.J., & Abdollahi, A. (2010). Organizational behavior in concern of communication satisfaction: The role of the formal and informal communication. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 51–61.
• Knippenberg, D.V. & Sleebos, A.E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 571–584.
• Korkut, F. (1997). Evaluation of communication skills of university students. IV National Congress of Educational Sciences, Congress Book, Anadolu University, Eskişehirm, Turkey (pp. 208–218). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
• Mael, F. & Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.
• McDowell, E.E. (1993). An exploratory study of GTA’s attitudes toward aspects of teaching and teaching style. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, November 18–21, 1993 in Miami Beach, FL. ERIC Number: ED370147.
• Meydan, C.H. & Polat, M. (2013). The role of academic success and conscientiousness on identification with school as an organizational form. Education and Science, 38(167), 27–40.
• Nakra, R. (2006). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational identification: An empirical study. The Journal of Business Perspective, 10(2), 41–51.
• Ortaş, İ. (2005). Educational models should be questioned in the new education period of universities. World of Medical Education, 18, 6–9.
• Özdemir, A. (2013). The relationship between the power sources of the lectures and the organizational identification of the prospective teachers: The mediator role of the intrinsic motivation. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 33(2), 269–291.
• Pepermans, R., Vloeberghs, D., & Perkisas, B. (2003). High potential identification policies: An empirical study among Belgian companies. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 660–678.
• Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384.
• Rousseau, D.M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 217–233.
• Şantaş, F., Uğurluoğlu, Ö., Kandemir, A., & Çelik, Y. (2016). The investigation of the relationship between the level of organizational cynicism, job performance and organizational identification among health employees. Gazi University, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(3), 867–886.
• Sezgin, F. (2005). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A conceptual analysis and some inferences for the schools. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 25(1), 317–339.
• Smidts, A., Pruyn, A.T.H., & Van Riel, B.M. (2017). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069448
• Spilt, J.L., Koomen, H.M.Y., & Thijs, J.T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 457–477.
• Tak, B. & Aydemir, B.A. (2004). Two empirical works on organizational identification. In the 12th National Management and Organization Congress, Congress Book, May 27–29, 2004 (pp. 59–63). Bursa, Turkey. ISBN: 9789756958926
• Tepeköylü, Ö., Soytürk, M., & Çamlıyer, H. (2009). Investigation of communication skill perceptions of students in School of Physical Education and Sports in terms of some variables. Ankara Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 7(3), 115–124.
• TLA (Turkish Language Association). (2019). Retrieved on January 12, 2019, from https://sozluk.gov.tr/?kelime=%C3%96ZDE%C5%9ELE%C5%9EME
• Tsai, M., Chuang, S., & Hsieh, W. (2009). An integrated process model of communication satisfaction and organizational outcomes. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(6), 825–834.
• Varona, F. (1996). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational commitment in three Guatemalan organizations. The Journal of Business Communication, 33(2), 111–140.
• Wilkins, S., Butt, M.M., Kratochvil, D., & Balakrishnan, M.S. (2016). The effects of social identification and organizational identification on student commitment, achievement and satisfaction in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(12), 2232–2252.
• Yıldız, K. (2013). Analysis of the relation of teachers’ organizational identification and organizational communication. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 264–272.
• Yüksel, Ö. (2000). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi. Ankara, Turkey: Gazi Kitabevi.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/pcssr-2021-0001