Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2018 | 51 | 2 |
Article title

Comparison of data mining techniques to predict and map the Atterberg limits in central plateau of Iran

Title variants
Languages of publication
The Atterberg limits display soil mechanical behavior and, therefore, can be so important for topics related to soil management. The aim of the research was to investigate the spatial variability of the Atterberg limits using three most common digital soil-mapping techniques, the pool of easy-to-obtain environmental variables and 85 soil samples in central Iran. The results showed that the maximum amount of liquid limit (LL) and plastic limit (PL) were obtained in the central, eastern and southeastern parts of the study area where the soil textural classes were loam and clay loam. The minimum amount of LL and PL were related to the northwestern parts of the study area, adjacent to the mountain regions, where the samples had high levels of sand content (>80%). The ranges of plasticity index (PI) in the study area were obtained between 0.01 to 4%. According to the leave-in-out cross-validation method, it should be highlighted the combination of artifiial bee colony algorithm (ABC) and artifiial neural network (ANN) techniques were the best model to predict the Atterberg limits in the study area, compared to the support vector machine and regression tree model. For instance, ABC-ANN could predict PI with RMSE, R2 and ME of 0.23, 0.91 and -0.03, respectively. Our fiding generally indicated that the proposed method can explain the most of variations of the Atterberg limits in the study area, and it could berecommended, therefore, as an indirect approach to assess soil mechanical properties in the arid regions, where the soil survey/sampling is difficult to undertake.
Physical description
19 - 09 - 2018
  • Abdi, E., Babapour, S., Majnounian, B., Zahedi-Amiri, G., Deljouei, A., 2018. How does organic matter affect the physical and mechanical properties of forest soil? Journal of Forest Research, 29(3): 657–662.
  • [2] Ahmed, Z., Iqbal, J., 2014. Evaluation of Landsat TM5 multispectral data for automated mapping of surface soil texture and organic matter in GIS. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 47: 557–573.
  • [3] Alavi-Panah, S.K., Goossens, R., Matinfar, H.R., Mohamadi, H., Ghadiri, M., Irannejad, H., 2008. The effiiency of Landsat TM and ETM+ thermal data for extracting soil information in arid regions. Agricultural Science and Technology, 10: 439–460.
  • [4] Andronikov, V.L., Dorbrolvskiy, G.V., 1991. Theory and methods for the use of remote sensing in the study of soils. Remote Sensing, 28: 92–101.
  • [5] Atterberg, A., 1911. Physical soil examination about the plasticity of clays. International Communication for Soil Science, 1: 10–43.
  • [6] Behrens, T., Forster, H., Scholten, T., Steinrucken, U., Spies, E.D., Goldschmitt, M., 2005. Digital soil mapping using artifiial neural networks. Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168: 21–33.
  • [7] British Standard. 1975. Methods of testing soils for civil engineering purposes. British Standard Institute, London.
  • [8] Brungard, C.W., Boettinger, J.L., Duniway, M.C., Wills, S.A., Edwards Thomas, C.J., 2015. Machine learning for predicting soil classes in three semi-arid landscapes. Geoderma, 240: 68–83.
  • [9] Bui, E.N., Moran, C.J., 2003. A strategy for filing gaps in soil survey over large spatial extents: An example from the Murray-Darling basin of Australia. Geoderma, 111: 21–44.
  • [10] Campbell, D.J., 2001. Liquid and plastic limits. In: K.A. Smith, C.E. Mullins (eds.), Soil and Environmental Analysis-Physical Methods, Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 349–375.
  • [11] De Jong, E., Acton, D.F., Stonehouse, H.B., 1990. Estimating the Atterberg limits of Southern Saskatchewan soils from texture and carbon contents. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 70: 543–554.
  • [12] Dixon, B., Candade, N., 2008. Multispectral land-use classifiation using neural networks and support vector machines: One or the other, or both? International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(4): 1185–1206.
  • [13] Ekhtesasi, M.R., Ahmadi, H., Baghestani, N., Khalili, A., Feiznia, S., 1995. Seeking the origin of sand dunes in Yazd-Ardakan plain (in Persian). Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, p. 250.
  • [14] Fanourakis, G.C., 2012. Estimating soil plasticity properties from pedological data. The South African Institution Journal of Civil Engineering, 2: 117–125.
  • [15] Gan-lin, Z., Feng, L., Xiao-dong, S. 2017. Recent progress and future prospect of digital soil mapping: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(12): 2871–2885.
  • [16] Gee, G.W., Bauder J.W., 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: A. Klute (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed., SSSA Book Series 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp. 383–411, DOI: 10.1108/09593840110411167.
  • [17] Grunwald, S., 2006. Environmental Soil-Landscape Modeling. Geographic Information Technologies and Pedometrics, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton–London–New York.
  • [18] Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H., 2009. The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explore News, 11: 10–18.
  • [19] Hengl, T., Huvelink, G.B.M., Stein, A., 2004. A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging. Geoderma, 120: 75–93.
  • [20] Hengl, T., Toomanian, N., Reuter, H.I., Malakouti, M.J., 2007. Methods to interpolate soil categorical variables from profie observations: Lessons from Iran. Geoderma, 140: 417–427.
  • [21] Hsu, S.H., Hsieh, J.J.P., Chih, T.C., Hsu, K.C., 2009. A two-stage architecture for stock price forecasting by integrating self-organizing map and support vector regression. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 7947–7951.
  • [22] Jafari, A., Finke, P., Wauw, J., Ayoubi, S., Khademi, H., 2012. Spatial prediction of USDA-great soil groups in the arid Zarand region, Iran: Comparing logistic regression approaches to predict diagnostic horizons and soil types. European Journal of Soil Science, 63: 284–298.
  • [23] Jafari, S., Baghdadi, G., Hashemi Golpayegani, S.M.R., Towhidkhah, F., Gharibzadeh, S., 2013. Is attention defiit hyperactivity disorder a kind of intermittent chaos? Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 25, E02.
  • [24] Karaboga, D., Bahriye, A., 2009. A comparative study of Artifiial Bee Colony algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computing, 214: 108–132.
  • [25] Keller, T., Dexter, A.R., 2012. Plastic limits of agricultural soils as functions of soil texture and organic matter content. Soil Research, 50: 7–17.
  • [26] Keshavarz, A., Ghasemian Yazdi, V.H., 2004. A fast algorithm based on support vector machine for classifiation of hyperspectral images using spatial correlation (in Persian). Computer, Engineering and Electrical of Iran, 3: 37–44.
  • [27] Kim, J., Hwang, M., Jeong, D.H., Jung, H., 2012. Technology trends analysis and forecasting application based on decision tree and statistical feature analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 12618–12625.
  • [28] Kovačević, M., Bajat, B., Gajić, B., 2010. Soil type classifiation and estimation of soil properties using support vector machines. Geoderma. 154: 340–347.
  • [29] Kuhn, M., Johnson, K., 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling. Springer Science+Business, New York, XIII, 600.
  • [30] Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., 2007. Spatial soil information systems and spatial soil inference systems: perspectives for digital soil mapping. Digital soil mapping: An introductory perspective. Developments in Soil Science, 31: 3–22.
  • [31] Levenberg, K., 1944. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2: 164–168.
  • [32] Liao, K., Xu, S., Wu, J., Zhu, Q., 2013. Spatial estimation of surface soil texture using remote sensing data. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 59: 488–500.
  • [33] Marchetti, A., Piccini, C., Santucci, S., Chiuchiarelli, I., Francaviglia, R., 2011. Simulation of soil types in Teramo province (Central Italy) with terrain parameters and remote sensing data. CATENA, 85: 267–274.
  • [34] Marquardt, D.W., 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2): 431–441.
  • [35] Mena, J., 1999. Data Mining Your Website, Digital Press, Woburn.
  • [36] Metternicht, G.I., Zinck, J.A., 2003. Remote sensing of soil salinity: Potentials and constraints. Remote Sensing Environment, 85: 1–20.
  • [37] Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B., 2006. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers and Geosciences, 32: 1378–1388.
  • [38] Mirkhani, R., Saadat, M., Shaban-Poorshahrestani, M., Aria, P., Yegane, M., 2006. Evaluating of soil stability using readily available of soil properties (in Persian). Water and Soil Science, 21(2): 201–207.
  • [39] Moonjun, R., Farshad, A., Shrestha, D.P., Vaiphasa, C., 2010. Artifiial neural network and decision tree in predictive soil mapping of Hoi Rin sub-watershed, Thailand. Digital Soil Mapping: Bridging Research, Environmental Application and Operation, 2: 151–164.
  • [40] Moradi, S., 2013. Effects of CEC on Atterberg limits and plastic index in different soil textures. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4: 2111–2118.
  • [41] Mukhlisin, M., Rahman, A., 2014. Prediction of Atterberg limits via ANN and ANFIS: A comparison. Recent Advances in Environmental Science and Geoscience, 69–74.
  • [42] Oreski, S., Oreski, D., Oreski, G., 2012. Hybrid system with genetic algorithm and artificial neural networks and its application to retail credit risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16): 12605–12617.
  • [43] Pahlavan Rad, M.R., Toomanian, N., Khormali, F., Brungard, C.W., Komaki, C.K., Bogaert, P., 2014. Updating soil survey maps using random forest and conditioned Latin hypercube sampling in the loess derived soils of northern Iran. Geoderma, 232(234): 97–106.
  • [44] Panigrahi, B.K., Yuhui, S., Meng-Hiot, L., 2011. Handbook of Swarm Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg.
  • [45] Pao, Y.-H., 1989. Adaptive Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Reading, MA.
  • [46] Poggio, L., Gimona, A., Brewer, M., 2013. Regional scale mapping of soil properties and their uncertainty with a large number of satellite derived covariates. Geoderma, 209(210): 1–14.
  • [47] Quinlan, J.R., 2001. Cubist: An Informal Tutorial,
  • [48] Rahimnia, R., Heidari Bani, V.D., 2010. Effect of soil plasticity index on tensile and compressive strength of stabilized brick with cement for using protection of adobe structures (in Persian). Repair, History Cultural of Monuments and Tissues, 2(1): 91–102.
  • [49] Saikia, A., Baruah, D., Das, K., Rabha, H.J., Dutta, A., Saharia, A., 2017. Predicting compaction characteristics of fie-grained soils in terms of Atterberg limits. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 3(18): 1–9.
  • [50] Scull, P., Franklin, J., Chadwick, O.A., McArthur, D., 2003. Predictive soil mapping: A review. Progress in Physical Geography, 27: 171–197.
  • [51] Sherzoy, M.M., 2017. Atterberg limits prediction comparing SVM with ANFIS model. Geoscience, Engineering, Environment and Technology, 2(1): 20–30.
  • [52] Stum, A.K., Boettinger, J.L., White, M.A., Ramsey, R.D., 2010. Random forests applied as a soil spatial predictive model in arid Utah. Digital Soil Mapping. Part of the progress in soil science book series, 2: 179–190.
  • [53] Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Nabiollahi, K., Kerry, R., 2016. Digital mapping of soil organic carbon at multiple depths using different data mining techniques in Baneh region, Iran. Geoderma, 266: 98–110.
  • [54] Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Neupane, R., Sood, K., Kumar, S., 2017. Artifiial bee colony feature selection algorithm combined with machine learning algorithms to predict vertical and lateral distribution of soil organic matter in South Dakota, USA. Carbon Management, 8: 277–291.
  • [55] Tol, J.J.V., Dzene, A.R., Roux, P.A.L.L., Schall, R., 2016. Pedotransfer functions to predict Atterberg limits for South African soils using measured and morphological properties. Soil Use and Management, 32: 635–643.
  • [56] Yildirim, B., Gunaydin, O., 2011. Estimation of California bearing ratio by using soft computing systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 6381–6391.
  • [57] Zentar, R., Abriak, N.E., Dubois, V., 2009. Effects of salts and organic matter on Atterberg limits of dredged marine sediments. Applied Clay Science, 42: 391–397.
  • [58] Zeraatpisheh, M., Ayoubi, S., Jafari, A., Finke, P., 2017. Comparing the effiiency of digital and conventional soil mapping to predict soil types in a semi-arid region in Iran. Geomorphology, 285: 186–204.
  • [59] Zolfaghari, Z., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Ayoubi, S., 2015. ANN-based pedotransfer and soil spatial prediction functions for predicting Atterberg consistency limits and indices from easily available properties at the watershed scale in western Iran. Soil Use and Management, 31(1): 142–154.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.