The Influence of Fertilization with Phosphorus, Sulphate, Carbon and Nitrogen Content on Hydrolases Activities in Soil

• Authors: Anetta Siwik-Ziomek , Joanna Lemanowicz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper presents the results of the study connected with determining the contents of total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (PE-R), sulphate sulphur (S-SO4 2-), and the activity of acid phosphatase (AcP) and arylsulphatase (ARS) in Haplic Luvisol (LVh) fertilised with varied farmyard manure (FYM) doses (0, 20, 40, 60, 80 t ha-1) and nitrogen in the form of ammonium nitrate (N0, N1, N2, N3). The experiment involved a 4-year crop-rotation (2005-2009). A significant effect of fertilisation with farmyard manure (FYM), ammonium sulphate and the selection of crops in crop rotation on the content of TOC and TN was found. The content of phosphorus available to plants was significantly higher in the soil sampled in the third year of research under spring barley fertilised with the FYM at the dose of 60 t ha-1 and nitrogen at the dose of N2. The activity of acid phosphatase in soil increased with increasing nitrogen doses. The mean amount of sulphates classifies the soil as representing a very high richness and guarantees a good supply of plants with that nutrient. The greatest activity of arylsulphatase was reported in the samples of the soil fertilised with the FYM at the amount of 80 kg ha-1.

Keywords

EN

Arylsulphatase; Crop rotation; Fertilization; Macroelements; Phosphatase

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Polish Journal of Soil Science
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 49
• Issue: 1

Dates

published

2016

online

03 - 01 - 2017

Contributors

author

Anetta Siwik-Ziomek

author

Joanna Lemanowicz

References

• [1] AlkortaI, Aizpurua A., Riga P., AlbizuI., AmezagaI., Garbisu C., 2003. Soil enzyme activities as biological indicators of soil health. Revives on Environmental Health, 18(1): 65–73.
• [2] Bardsley C.E., Lancaster J.D., 1960. Determination of reserve sulfur and soluble sulfates in soil. Soil Science Society of America, 24: 265–268.
• [3] Boyd S.A., Mortland M.M., 1990. Enzyme interactions with clays and clay-organic matter complexes. In: Bollag J-M. Stotzky G (eds.) Soil biochemistry, 6, Marcel Dekker. New York, pp: 1–28.
• [4] Dick R.P., 1994. Soil enzymes activities as indicators of soil quality. In: J.W. Doran and A.J. Jones (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication. Madison, Wl, USA, 35: 107–124.
• [5] Dodor D.E., Tabatabai M.A., 2003. Effect of crop rotation systems on phosphatases in soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition Soil Science, 166: 7–13.
• [6] Eriksen J., Thorup-Christensen K., Askegard M., 2004. Plant availability of catch crop sulfur following spring incorporation. Journal of Plant Nutrition Soil Science, 167: 609–615.
• [7] Germida J.J, Wainwright M., Gupta V.V.S.R., 1992. Biochemistry of sulphur cycling in soil. Soil Biochemistry, 7: 1–53.
• [8] Gianfreda L., Ruggiero P., 2006. Enzyme activities in soil. In: Nannipieri P. Smalla K. (eds.) Soil Biology, 8: 257–311.
• [9] Girma K., Mosali J., Freeman K.W., Raun W.R., Martin K.L., Thomason W.E., 2005. Forage and grain yield response to applied sulfur in winter wheat as influenced by source and rate. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 28: 1541–1553.
• [10] ISO 10390, 2005. Soil quality - Determination of pH. Polish Standards Committee. Warsaw Poland.
• [11] Knauff U., Schulz M., Scherer H.W., 2003. Arylsulphatase activity in the rhizosphere and roots of different crop species. European Journal of Agronomy, 19: 215–223.
• [12] Kotkova B., Balik J., Cerny J., Kulkanek M., Bazalova M., 2008. Crop influence on mobile sulphur content and arylsulphatase activity in the plant rhizosphere. Plant and Soil Environment, 4: 100–107.
• [13] L e m a n o w i c z J., S i w i k - Z i o m e k A., K o p e r J., 2014. Effects of farmyard manure and nitrogen fertilizers on mobility of phosphorus and sulphur in wheat and activity of selected hydrolases in soil. International Agrophysics, 28: 49–55.
• [14] L i p i ń s k i W., T e r e l a k H., M o t o w i c k a -T e r e l a k T., 2003. Suggestion for limiting values of sulphate sulphur content in mineral soils for fertilization advisory needs (in Polish). Soil Science Annual, 54(3): 79–84.
• [15] L i u E., Ya n C., M e i X., H e W., S o H.B., D i n g L., L i u Q., L i u S., F a n T., 2010. Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer straw and manure on soil chemical and biological properties in northwest China. Geoderma, 158: 173–180.
• [16] Ma s c a g n i H.J.Jr, H a r r i s o n S.A., P a d g e t t G.B., 2008. Influence of sulfur fertility on wheat yield performance on alluvial and upland soils. Communication of Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 39: 2133–2145.
• [17] N a n n i p i e r i P., G i a g n o n i L., L a n d i L., R e n e l l a G., 2011. Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil, in: E.K. Bunemann (Ed.) Phosphorus in Action, Soil Biology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 26: 215–243.
• [18] O k u r N., K a y i k c i o g l u H.H., O k u r B., Delibacak S., 2008. Organic amendment based on tobacco waste compost and farmyard manure: influence on soil biological properties and butter-head lettuce yield. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry, 32: 91–99.
• [19] PN-R-04023, 1996. Chemical and Agricultural Analysis of Soil – Determining the Content of Available Phosphorus in Mineral Soils. Polish Standards Committee. Warsaw Poland.
• [20] PN-ISO 11261, 2002. Soil quality – Total nitrogen assaying – Modified Kjeldahl method. Polish Standards Committee. Warsaw Poland.
• [21] S a m u e l A.D., D o m u t a C., S a n d o r M., Vu s c a n A., D o m u t a C. 2010. The estimation of phosphatase activity in soil. Research Journal Agricultural Sciences, 42(3): 311–314.
• [22] S c h e r e r H.W., 2009. Sulphur in soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition of Soil Science, 172: 326–335.
• [23] S c h l o t e r M., D i l l y O., M u n c h J.C., 2003. Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agricultural, Ecosystem & Environmental, 98: 255–262.
• [24] S c h o n h o f I., B l a n k e n b u r g D., M ü l l e r S., K r u m b e i n A., 2007. Sulfur and nitrogen supply influence growth, product appearance. and glucosinolate concentration of broccoli. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170: 65–72.
• [25] S i e n k i e w i c z S., K r z e b i e t k e S., Wo j n o w s k a T., Ż a r c z y ń s k i P., O m i l i a n M., 2009. Effect of long-term differentiated fertilization with farmyard manure and mineral fertilizers on the content of available forms of P, K and Mg in soil(in Polish). Journal of Elementology, 14(4): 779–786.
• [26] S o s u l s k i T., S t ę p i e ń M., S z a r a E., M e r c i k S., 2005. Content of Total Nitrogen in soils and the balance of N in long – term experiments in Skierniewice(in Polish). Fragmenta Agronomica, 22 1(85): 264–273.
• [27] Ta b a t a b a i M.A., 1994. Soil enzymes. In: R.W. Weaver, J.R. Angle, P.S. Bottomley (eds.) Methods of soil analysis. Soil Science Society of America Book. Series 5. SSSA. Madison, WI: 775–833.
• [28] Ta b a t a b a i M.A., B r e m n e r J.M., 1969. Use of p–nitrophenol phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1: 301–307.
• [29] Ta b a t a b a i M.A., B r e m n e r J.M., 1970. Factors affecting soil arylsulphatase activity. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding, 34: 427-429.
• [30] Ż e b r o w s k a E., C i e r e s z k o I., 2009. Acid phosphatases role in plant cells phosphate homeostasis( in Polish). Advances in Cell Biology 36: 583–599.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/pjss.2016.49.1.49