Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2012 | 45 | 1 |

Article title



Title variants

Languages of publication



Studies on morphological features and chemical composition of Ap horizons of soils located on gentle Narew valley-sides were carried out. The Luvisols with a texture of loamy sands and sandy loams are developed on the slope shoulder while the Mollic Gleysols of a similar texture with deposits to 110 cm thick are located on the footslope. The soil particle size distribution and total nitrogen (TN), total porosity (TP) and KH2SO4 H2O2 _ content in both slope positions are similar. The mean TN, TP and KH SO H O 2 4 2 2 _ content on the slope shoulder is 0.94, 0.36 and 1.26 g kg-1, respectively, while soils on the footslope are characterized with a mean content of total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of 1.15, 0.35, and 1.17 g kg-1, respectively. Plough horizons of soils located on the footslope are more acidic with higher Corg content. The mean exchangeable acidity in deluvial soils (4.20 cmol(+) kg-1) is higher than in soils located in upper slope positions (2.92 cmol(+) kg-1). Similar texture of soils in both slope positions as well as thick deluvial deposits on the footslope is evidence of tillage erosion as the main factor of soil downslope translocation on these gentle slopes.








Physical description


05 - 04 - 2016



  • [1] B a n a s z u k H.: Ekonomia i Środowisko. Białystok, 1996.
  • [2] B a n a s z u k P.: Wyd. Ekonomia i Środowisko. Białystok, 141, 2004.
  • [3] B i e n i e k B.: Acta Acad. Agricult. Tech. Olst. Agricultura, 64, Supll., 1997.
  • [4] B i e n i e k B., W ó j c i a k H.: Bibl. Fragm. Agron., 4B/98, 251, 1998.
  • [5] De Alba S., Lindstrom M., Schumacher T.E., Malo D.D.: Catena, 58, 77, 2004.
  • [6] Gołębiowska A., Koćmit A., G i e g uż yń s k a E., Sasim S.: Humic Subst. Environ., 97, 33, 1997
  • [7] G ó r n i a k A.: Wyd. IMGW Oddz. w Białymstoku, 2000.
  • [8] G u i r e s s e M., R e v e l J. C.: Soil Till. Res., 35, 157, 1995.
  • [9] H e c k r a t h G., D j u r h u u s J., Q u i n e T.A., Van O o s t K., G o v e r s G., Zhang Y.: J. Environ. Qual., 34, 312, 2005.
  • [10] K a ź m i e r o w s k i C.: Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin., 217, 87, 2001.
  • [11] K a ź m i e r o w s k i C.: Roczn. AR Poznań, CCCXLII, Melior. Inż. OErod., 23, 181, 2002.
  • [12] K o ć m i t A.: Rozprawy AR Szczecin, 113, 1, 1988.
  • [13] K o ć m i t A.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 460, 531, 1998.
  • [14] Koćmit A., Chudecka J., PodlasińskiM., Raczkowski B., RoyM., Tomasze w i c z T.: Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin., 217, 97, 2001.
  • [15] Li S., Lobb D.A., Lindstrom M. J., F a r e n h o r s t A.: Catena, 70, 493, 2007.
  • [16] M c L a u c h l a n K.: Ecosystems, 9, 1364, 2006.
  • [17] P a l u s z e k J.: Roczn. Glebozn., 55, 4, 103, 2004.
  • [18] P a p i e r n i k S.K., Lindstrom M. J., Schumacher T.E., Schumacher J.A., Malo D. D., L o b b D. A.: Soil Till. Res., 93, 335, 2007.
  • [19] R o y M., P o d l a s i ń s k i M.: Ochrona agroekosystemów zagrożonych erozją. Puławy, K (11/2), 295, 1996.
  • [20] S z r e j d e r B.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 460, 499, 1998.
  • [21] Takken I., Beuselinck L., Nachtergaele J., Govers G., Poesen J., Degraer G.: Catena, 37, 431, 1999.
  • [22] Wysocka-Czubaszek A., Banaszuk P.: Polish J. Environ. Stud., 15, 5d, 728, 2006.
  • [23] V a n O o s t K., G o v e r s G., D e s m e t P.: Landscape Ecology, 15, 577, 2000.
  • [24] Va n Oost K., Van Muysen W., GoversG., Deckers J., Quine T.A.: Geomorphology, 72, 193, 2005.
  • [25] Z h a n g J. H., S u Z. A., N i e X. J.: Soil Till. Res., 105, 177, 2009.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.