PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2012 | 45 | 1 |
Article title

CONTENT OF SULPHATE SULPHUR IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF SOILS IN THE PODKARPACKIE REGION

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The aim of the investigation was the estimation of sulphate sulphur in soils in the Podkarpackie Province. The content of sulphate sulphur within the soils developed on flysch works subject to strong spatial variability of 0.87 g kg-1 in the Przemyoel Foothills to 2.00 g kg-1 in the Cieżkowickie and Strzyżowskie Foothills. The content of sulphate sulphur in soils is positively correlated with the content of humus in the Western Bieszczady Mountains and the content of colloidal clay fraction within the Tarnogrodzki Plateau and Rzeszów Foothills. In soil types: Haplic Cambisol, Haplic Cambisol (Dystric), Haplic Cambisol Podzolised, Haplic Podzol and Haplic Luvisol found in the Podkarpackie Province there is no significant variation of the sulphate Sulphur content (average 1.73-1.93mg100g-1), but less sulphur was found in Haplic Cambisol (Eutric) soils.
Keywords
EN
 
Year
Volume
45
Issue
1
Physical description
Dates
published
2012
online
05 - 04 - 2016
Contributors
References
  • [1] B r a d s l e y C. E., L a n c a s t e r J. D.: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 24, 265, 1960.
  • [2] D i a m o n d S., H a n l e y P. K.: Sulphur in Agric., Dublin, 107, 1, 1970.
  • [3] E r i k s e n J., M u r p h y M. D., S c h u n g E.: The soil sulphur cycle. In: Sulphur in Agroecosystems. Ed. E. Schung. Dordrecht-Boston-London. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
  • [4] FAO/UNESCO: SoilMapof the World. Revised Legend. Soils Bulletin 60.FAORome, 1990.
  • [5] J a k u b u s M., C z e k a ³ a J.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 456, 323, 1988.
  • [6] Kaczor A., Zuzańska J.: Chemia. Dydaktyka. Ekologia. Metrologia, 14, 1-2, 69, 2009.
  • [7] K o n d r a c k i J.: Geografia regionalna Polski. Warszawa, PWN, 2002.
  • [8] Koter M., Grzesiuk W., Chodań J.: Zesz. Nauk.WSROlsztyn, 16, 292, 275, 1963.
  • [9] K u l c z y c k i G., P a t o r c z y k - P y t l i k B.: Ekotoksykologia w Ochronie Środowiska, 203, 212, 2008.
  • [10] M c G r a t h S. P., Z h a o F. J.: Soil Use and Management, 11, 110, 1995.
  • [11] M o t o w i c k a - T e r e l a k T., T e r e l a k H.: Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin, Rolnictwo, 81, 7, 2000.
  • [12] R e j m a n - C z a j k o w s k a M.: Roczn. Glebozn., 24, 2, 203, 1973.
  • [13] S c h e r e r H.W.: Eur. J. Agron., 14, 81, 2001.
  • [14] Singh B.R., Abrahemsen G., S t u a n e s A.: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 75, 1980.
  • [15] S k ł o d o w s k i P.: Roczn. Glebozn., 19(1), 99, 1968.
  • [16] S z u l c W., Rutkowska B., Łabętowicz J.: Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 59(1), 55, 2004.
  • [17] T e r e l a k H., M o t o w i c k a - T e r e la k T., P a s t e r n a c k i J., W i l k o s S.: Pam. Puł, Supl., 891, 1, 1998.
  • [18] Terelak H., Piotrowska M., Motowicka-Terelak T., Stuczyñski T., Budzyńska K.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 418, 45, 1995.
  • [19] Właśniewski S., Kaniuczak J., Hajduk E.: Zesz. Nauk. PTG, 11, 265, 2009.
  • [20] Zadrożny P., Miechówka A., N i c i a P.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 520, 571, 2007.
  • [21] Z a l e w s k i W.: Problemy ochrony środowiska. Wyd. WSR-P Siedlce, 1995.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17951_pjss_2012_45_1_29
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.