Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 71 | 1 |
Article title

The effect of concomitant use of nano-structured essential metals and sulfur on growth characteristics of safflower

Title variants
Languages of publication
Deficiencies of zinc, manganese and iron are common in calcareous soils of arid and semiarid regions due to their reduced solubility alkaline conditions. However, sustainable crop production is essential for growing population. Sulfur fertilizers can increase micronutrients availability by decreasing soil pH. In order to investigate the influence of nano-chelated essential metals (Zn, Mn, Fe) and sulfur application (zero and 40 kg ha-1) an experiment was carried out in Maragheh, northwest of Iran. Phenological development, morphological and agronomic traits significantly responded to both factors. Results revealed that application of sulfur fertilizer considerably increased morphological traits such as ground cover, stem diameter, plant height and capitulum diameter. Mean comparison between nano-chelated metal showed that the highest value for seed yield and yield components (number of the capitulum per plants, seed number per capitulum and seed weight) was achieved through the application of nano-chelated Zn. The best performance was related to combined application of sulfur and nano-chelated Zn which was followed by nano-chelated Fe. Seed oil content was only affected by nano-metals, so the highest value was obtained by application of nano-chelated Zn. Overall our finding revealed that integrated application of sulfur and essential metals, especially Zn, is required to grow safflower successfully on calcareous soils. The efficiency of nano-chelated fertilizers can be noticeably increased by balanced nutrient management in semi-arid regions.
Physical description
03 - 04 - 2017
  • 1. Alloway B.J. 2006. Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. Online book published by the International Zinc Association, Brussels, Belgium.
  • 2. Barea J. M., Palenzuela J., Cornejo P., Sánchez-Castro I., Navarro-Fernández C., Lopéz-García A., Estrada B., Azcón R., Ferrol N., Azcón-Aguilar C. 2011. Ecological and functional roles of mycorrhizas in semi-arid ecosystems of Southeast Spain. Journal of arid environments, 75 (12): 1292–1301.
  • 3. de Valença A. W., Bake A. 2016. Micronutrient management for improving harvests, human nutrition, and the environment. Scientific Project, Assigned by Food & Business Knowledge Platform. Netherlands. p. 24.
  • 4. Droux M. 2004. Sulfur assimilation and the role of sulfur in plant metabolism: a survey. Photosynthesis Research. 79 (3), 331–348.
  • 5. FAOSTAT. 2013. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Statistical database.
  • 6. Flemmer A. C., Franchini M. C., Lindström L. I. 2015. Description of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) phenological growth stages according to the extended BBCH scale. Annals of Applied Biology. 166 (2): 331–339.
  • 7. Ghafariyan M. H., Malakouti M. J., Dadpour M. R., Stroeve P., Mahmoudi M. 2013. Effects of magnetite nanoparticles on soybean chlorophyll. Environmental science & technology. 47 (18): 10645–10652.
  • 8. Gilbert J.(2008. International safflower production – an overview. [In:] Knights, S.E. and Potter, T.D. (Eds). Safflower: Unexploited potential and world adaptability. Proceedings of the 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
  • 9. Haneklaus S., Bloem E., Schnug E. 2007. Sulfur interactions in crop ecosystems. [In:] Sulfur in Plants. An Ecological Perspective Springer Netherlands, pp. 17–58.
  • 10. Hemmaty S., Dilmaghani M. R., Naseri L. 2012. Effects of sulfur application on soil pH and uptake of phosphorus, iron and zinc in apple trees. Journal of Plant Physiology & Breeding, 2 (1): 1–10.
  • 11. Imas P. 2000. Integrated nutrient management for sustaining crop yields in calcareous soils. [In:] GAUPRII-IPI National Symposium, International Potash Institute, Gujarat, India. September, pp. 19–22.
  • 12. Iqbal N., Masood A., Khan M. I. R., Asgher M., Fatma M., Khan N. A. 2013. Cross-talk between sulfur assimilation and ethylene signaling in plants. Plant signaling & behavior. 8 (1): e22478.
  • 13. Janmohammadi M., Navid A., Segherloo A. E., Sabaghnia, N. 2016. Impact of nano-chelated micronutrients and biological fertilizers on growth performance and grain yield of maize under deficit irrigation condition. Biologija. 62 (2): 134–147.
  • 14. Khoshgoftarmanesh A. H., Schulin R., Chaney R. L., Daneshbakhsh B., Afyuni M. 2010. Micronutrient-efficient genotypes for crop yield and nutritional quality in sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 30 (1): 83–107.
  • 15. Kim M. J., Kim I. J., Nam S. Y., Lee C. H., Song B. H. 2004. Effects of Type and Amounts of Sulfur Fertilizer on Growth and Seed Yield of Safflower. Korean Journal of Crop Science. 49 (6): 503–506.
  • 16. Landau S., Friedman S., Brenner S., Bruckental I., Weinberg Z. G., Ashbell G., Hen Y., Dvash L., Leshem Y. 2004. The value of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) hay and silage grown under Mediterranean conditions as forage for dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science, 88 (3): 263-271.
  • 17. Leytem A. B., Mikkelsen R. L. 2005. The nature of phosphorus in calcareous soils. Better Crops, 89 (2): 11–13.
  • 18. Li W., Xiong B., Wang S., Deng X., Yin L., Li H. 2016. Regulation Effects of Water and Nitrogen on the Source-Sink Relationship in Potato during the Tuber Bulking Stage. PloS one. 11 (1): e0146877.
  • 19. Liu R., Lal, R. 2015. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the Total Environment. 514: 131–139.
  • 20. Marschner H. 2011. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press.
  • 21. McCauley A., Jones C., Jacobsen J. 2009. Soil pH and organic matter. Nutrient Management Module. 8: 1–12.
  • 22. Mohammady-Aria M., Lakzian A., Haghnia G. H., Berenji A. R., Besharati H., Fotovat A. 2010. Effect of Thiobacillus, sulfur, and vermicompost on the water-soluble phosphorus of hard rock phosphate. Bioresource Technology. 101 (2): 551–554.
  • 23. Mohsennia O., Jalilian J. 2012. Response of safflower seed quality characteristics to different soil fertility systems and irrigation disruption. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. 3: 968–976.
  • 24. Naderi M. R., Danesh-Shahraki A. 2013. Nanofertilizers and their roles in sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 19 (5): 2229–2232.
  • 25. Namvar A., Seyed-Sharifi R. 2011. Phenological and morphological response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to symbiotic and mineral nitrogen fertilization. Zemdirbysté-Agriculture. 98: 121–130.
  • 26. Parisi C., Vigani M., Rodríguez-Cerezo E. 2015. Agricultural Nanotechnologies: What are the current possibilities? Nano Today. 10 (2): 124–127.
  • 27. Peel M. C., Finlayson B. L., McMahon T. A. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 4 (2): 439–473.
  • 28. Pirzadeh M., Afyuni M., Khoshgoftarmanesh A., Schulin, R. 2010. Micronutrient status of calcareous paddy soils and rice products: implication for human health. Biology and fertility of soils. 46 (4): 317–322.
  • 29. Pradhan S., Patra P., Das S., Chandra S., Mitra S., Dey K. K., Akbar S, Palit P, Goswami A. 2013. Photochemical modulation of biosafe manganese nanoparticles on Vigna radiata: a detailed molecular, biochemical, and biophysical study. Environmental Science & Technology. 47 (22): 13122–13131.
  • 30. Rai M., Ribeiro C., Mattoso L., Duran N. (Eds.). (2015). Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture (pp. 8–13). Springer.
  • 31. Sahrawat K. L., Wani S. P. 2013. Soil testing as a tool for on-farm fertility management: experience from the semi-arid zone of India. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 44 (6): 1011–1032.
  • 32. Skujins, J. 1991. Semiarid Lands and Deserts: Soil Resource and Reclamation. CRC Press.
  • 33. Subramanian K. S., Manikandan A., Thirunavukkarasu M., Rahale C. S. 2015. Nano-fertilizers for balanced crop nutrition. [In:] Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture (pp. 69–80). Springer International Publishing.
  • 34. Warraich E. A., Ahmad N., Basra S. M., Afzal I. R. (2002). Effect of nitrogen on source-sink relationship in wheat. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology. 4: 300–302.
  • 35. Weiss E. A. 2000. Oilseed Crops. Blackwell Science. P. 1573.
  • 36. Yau S. K. 2004. Yield, agronomic performance, and economics of safflower in comparison with other rainfed crops in a semi-arid, high-elevation Mediterranean environment. Experimental Agriculture, 40: 453–462.
  • 37. Yau S-K., Ryan J. 2010. Response of rainfed safflower to nitrogen fertilization under Mediterranean conditions. Industrial Crops and Products. 32: 318–323.
  • 38. Zhao L., Sun Y., Hernandez-Viezcas J. A., Servin A. D., Hong J., Niu G., Peralta-Videa J.R., Duarte-Gardea M, Gardea-Torresdey J. L. 2013. Influence of CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on cucumber physiological markers and bioaccumulation of Ce and Zn: a life cycle study. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 61 (49): 11945–11951.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.