Reaction time and stress tolerance of police officers in specific and non-specific tests in professional self-defence training

• Authors: Michal Vit , Miloslav Houdek , Martin Sebera

Abstracts

EN

The police forces performance is demanding on well-timed and quick reaction. Single reaction time and choice reaction time are crucial when the jeopardy appears. Performing under stress in life-threatening situations needs a good level of stress tolerance. In our study, we used two nonspecific, and two specific (shooting) tests to analyse the reactivity of police officer under different conditions. Material and methods: The research sample consisted of n=18 male Czech police training instructors. The group is unique as these police officers are specialised in the professional self-defence with focus on the coercive means use and shooting skills. Two standardized non-specific tests administrated with the Vienna Test System (VTS) by Schuhfried GmbH were used for data gathering. Single reaction time (SRT) was measured by the Reaction test, stress tolerance and choice reaction time (CRT) was measured by the Determination test. Two practical non-standardized shooting tests were used for the reactivity analysis in the goal oriented environment (shooting range). Results: The single reaction time among police training instructors was M=261.56±33.60 ms, which corresponds to the 66.28 percentile of age norm. Performance in the stress tolerance test also matches the average performance in population (M=45.56 percentile of correct reactions, M=61.67 percentile of incorrect reactions, M=51.44 percentile of skipped signals). According to the Pearson correlation coefficient, there is no correlation between single reaction time in the Reaction test and choice reaction time in the Determination test (r=-0.03). There is no correlation between single reaction time in the nonspecific Reaction test and performance in the specific Shooting test 1 (r=0.06) and Shooting test 2 (r=-0.01). Conclusions: There is no relation between the results in the specific and non-specific reaction tests. Nonspecific tests of single reaction time and choice reaction time are suitable for a general assessment of motor abilities. Specific tasks need specific training and specific evaluation methods.

Keywords

EN

response time; stress; self-defence; police; law enforcement training; shooting

• Publisher: Institute of Physical Education and Tourism. Jan Długosz University of Czestochowa
• Journal: Physical Activity Review
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 7
• Pages: 193-200

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Michal Vit

• Masaryk University, Faculty of Sports Studies, Brno, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000000219224595

author

Miloslav Houdek

• Masaryk University, Faculty of Sports Studies, Brno, Czech Republic

author

Martin Sebera

• Masaryk University, Faculty of Sports Studies, Brno, Czech Republic

References

• 1. Gazo J, Mackova K. Vplyv rôznych modelov telesnej prípravy príslušníkov Policajného zboru na výkon v služobných zákrokoch a krízových sebaobranných situáiách. Telesná výchova a šport. 2017;27(4).
• 2. Struhar I, Dovrtelova L, Reguli Z. Influence of two years study in Special Education of Security Sections on the body posture. Arch Budo. 2015;11:359-364.
• 3. Hine KA, Porter LE, Westera NJ, Alpert GP, Allen A. Exploring Police Use of Force Decision-Making Processes and Impairments Using a Naturalistic Decision-Making Approach. Crim Justice Behav. 2018;45(11):1782-1801.
• 4. Gooch G, Williams M. A dictionary of law enforcement. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
• 5. Suss J, Ward P. Revealing perceptual-cognitive expertise in law enforcement: an iterative approach using verbal-report, temporal-occlusion, and option-generation methods. Cognition, Technology & Work. 2018;20:585-596.
• 6. Hancock PA, Szalma JL, editors. Performance under stress. Aldershot, England ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub; 2008. 389 p. (Human factors in defence).
• 7. Kohoutkova J, Cihounkova J, Skotakova A, Reguli Z. Self-defence for people with visual impairments. Ido Movement for Culture Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology. 2015; 15(2): 33-36. doi: 10.14589/ido.15.2.5
• 8. Grushko AI, Bochaver K, Kvitchasty K, Kovaleva A, Kabanov D, Konstantinova M, Kasatkin V. Diagnosis of the reaction time in different sports / Диагностика времени моторной реакции в различных видах спорта. Sports psychologist. 2017; 4(47): 82-87.
• 9. Celikovsky S. Antropomotorika pro studující tělesnou výchovu. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství;
• 10. Mekota K, Novosad J. Motorické schopnosti. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, Fakulta tělesné kultury; 2005.
• 11. Cynarski WJ, Borysiuk Z. Reaction time and movement time, types of sensorimotor responses and fencing tempo. Ido Movement for Culture - Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology. 2009; (9): 189-199.
• 12. Dolezajova L, Lednicky A. Rozvoj koordinačných schopností. Bratislava; 2002.
• 13. Dovalil J. Výkon a trénink ve sportu. Praha: Olympia; 2009.
• 14. Balko S, Rous M, Balko I, Hnizdil J, Borysiuk Z. Influence of a 9-week training intervention on the reaction time of fencers aged 15 to 18 years. Physical Activity Review. 2017; 5: 146-154. doi: 10.16926/par.2017.05.19
• 15. Wasik J, Shan G. Target effect on the kinematics of Taekwondo Roundhouse Kick - is the presence of a physical target a stimulus, influencing muscle-power generation? Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics 2015; 17: 115-120. doi: 10.5277/ABB-00229-2014-02
• 16. Wasik J, Gora T. Impact of target selection on front kick kinematics in taekwondo - pilot study. Physical Activity Review 2016; 4: 57-61. doi: 10.16926/par.2016.04.07
• 17. Quel OM de, Bennett SJ. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in combat sport: from scientific research to training. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas. 2016; 11(2s): 12-13.
• 18. Quel OM de, Bennett SJ, Adan EL, Zapico AG, Morales FS. Choice reaction time is not related to competition success in karate combat. European Journal of Human Movement. 2015; 35: 41-50.

Identifiers

DOI

10.16926/par.2019.07.23

Biblioteka Nauki

1922154