Pasożyty - kłopotliwy element sieci pokarmowych w ekosystemach

• Authors: Teresa Pojmańska , Katarzyna Niewiadomska

Title variants

EN

Parasites - inconvenient element in the structure of ecosystem food web

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

One of the fundamental aspects of ecological investigation is to describe the flow of mass and energy in an ecosystem, that is to define the trophic relations among the co-occurrent organisms. These relations form the complicate web of tropic chains, in which the subsequent links indicate "who eats whom". In handbooks of ecology the role of parasites in ecosystem functioning is often underestimated or even ignored, probably because that is rather difficult to find them in or on the other living creatures, and because they do not fit to some fundamental theoretical concepts of ecology. The examples: 1) consumer is bigger than its pray - parasites are always smaller than their host; 2) the higher trophic level the weaker vulnerability to predators - parasites may increase the vulnerability of their hosts to predators, and parasites which are at the top of the trophic chain may be in some circumstances a pray of the predators; 3) the number of organisms being eaten is higher that the number of eating organisms (more preys than predators) - generally one animal hosted several parasites, therefore the number of eating organisms is higher than the number of individuals being eaten. The inclusion of parasites greatly complicates the food webs by increasing the number of trophic chains. The case of digeneans - with their complex life cycle - is the a remarkable example of such complications, especially because of the fact, that one parasite connects the hosts from at least two (or more) trophic levels. According to one of the concepts of classical ecology, the quantitative changes in one level of the trophic pyramid produce an ecological cascade of changes (often also qualitative) in all trophic levels. This is the case in the presence of parasites, which can play an important role in the regulation of the abundance of host populations. They may directly kill their host, decrease their physical condition, or by manipulation of their behavior make them more susceptible to predators; they may also reduce their reproductive success (fitness). The manipulation of host behavior may also have an impact on some physical characteristics of the environment, and, consequently, on the abiotic and biotic features of biocenosis. In a natural environment, the parasites should be regarded equally to free-living organisms, influencing both the structure and functioning of every ecosystem.

• Journal: Kosmos
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 59
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 99-110

Dates

published

2010

Contributors

author

Teresa Pojmańska

• Instytut Parazytologii im. Witolda Stefańskiego PAN, Twarda 50/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Polska

author

Katarzyna Niewiadomska

• Instytut Parazytologii im. Witolda Stefańskiego PAN, Twarda 50/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Polska

References

• Aeby G. S., 2002. Trade-off for butterfly fish, Caeton multicinctus, when feeding on coral prey infected with trematode metacercariae. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 158-165.
• Byers J.E., 2009. Including parasites in food webs. Trends Parasitol. 25, 55-57.
• Combes C., 1999. Ekologia i ewolucja pasożytnictwa. Długotrwałe wzajemne oddziaływania. (przekład z języka francuskiego: Teresa Pojmańska i Bożena Grabda Kazubska). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Warszawa.
• Curtis L. A., 1987. Vertical distribution of an estuarine snail altered by a parasite. Science 235, 1509-1511.
• Dobson A. P., Hudson P. J., 1992. Regulation and stability of a free-living host-parasite system: Trichostrongylus tenuis in red grouse. II. Population models. J. Animal Ecol. 61, 487-500.
• Dronen N. O., Jr., 1978. Host-parasite population dynamics of Haematoloechus coloradensis Cort 1915 (Digenea, Plagiorchiidae). Am. Midland Nat. 899, 330-349.
• Ferrer M., Negro J. J., 2004. The near extinction of two large European predators: super specialist pay a price. Conserv. Biol. 18, 344-349.
• Grutter A. S., 1996. Parasite removal rates by the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus (Cuvier et Valenciennes) on the host fish Pomacentrus mollucensis (Bleeker). Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser. 130, 61-70.
• Grutter A. S., 2002. Cleaning symbioses from the parasites' perspective. Parasitology 124, S65-S81.
• Guégan J.-F., Hugueny B., 1994. A nested species subset pattern in tropical fish: host as major determinant of parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 100, 184-189.
• Hudson P. J., Dobson A. P., Newborn D., 1992 a. Do parasites make prey vulnerable to predation? J. Animal Ecol. 61, 681-692.
• Hudson P. J., Newborn D., Dobson A. P., 1992 b. Regulation and stability of a free-living host-parasite system: Trichostrongylus tenuis in red grouse. I. Monitoring and parasite reduction experiment. J. Animal Ecol. 61, 477-486.
• Hudson P. J., Dobson A. P., Lafferty K. D., 2006. Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends Parasitol. 21, 381-385.
• Jones A. W., 1967. Introduction to parasitology. Reding, Paolo Alto, London, Don Molls.
• Jones C. G., Lawton J. H., Shachak M., 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69, 373-386.
• Jones C. G., Lawton J. H., Shachak M., 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78, 1946-1957.
• Kisielewska K., 1957. O stosunkach wewnątrzpopulacyjnych u larw Drepanidotaenia lanceolata (Bloch) w niektórych żywicielach pośrednich. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 5, 63-90.
• Lafferty K. D., 1999. The evolution of trophic transmission. Parasitol. Today 15, 111-115.
• Lafferty K. D., Thomas F., Poulin R., 2000. Evolution of host phenotype manipulation by parasites and its consequences. [W:] Evolutionary biology of host-parasite relationships: theory meets reality. Poulin R., Morand S., A. Scorping A. (red). Elsevier Science B. V., 117-127.
• Lafferty K. D., Dobson A. P., Kuris A. M., 2006a. Parasites dominate food web links. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 130, 11211-11216.
• Lafferty K. D., Hechinger R. F., Shaw J. C., Whitney K. I., Kuris A. M., 2006b. Food webs and parasites in a salt marsh ecosystem. [W:] Disease Ecology: Community Structure and Pathogen Dynamics. COLLIGNE S., RAY C. (red). Oxford University Press, 119-134.
• Marcogliese D. J., 2002. Food web and transmission of parasites to marine fish. Parasitology 124, S83-S99.
• Marcogliese D. J., Cone D. K., 1997. Food webs: a plea for parasites. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 320-325.
• Mazgajski D. T., Kędra A. H., 1997. Are nestling of hole-nestling birds affected by ectoparasites? A review. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 43, 347-355.
• Michajłow W., 1968. Zarys Parazytologii Ewolucyjnej. PWN.
• Mouritsen K. N., 2002. The parasite-induced surfacing behaviour in the coockle Austrovenus stutchburyi: a test of an alternative hypothesis and identification of potential mechanisms. Parasitology 124, 521-528.
• Mouritsen K. N., Poulin R., 2002. Parasitism, community structure and biodiversity in intertidial ecosystems. Parasitology 124, S101-S117.
• Mouritsen K. N., Poulin R., 2003. Parasite-induced trophic facilitation exploited by a non-host predator: a manipulator's nightmare. Int. J. Parasitol. 33, 1043-1050.
• Niewiadomska K., Pojmańska T., Machnicka B., Czubaj A., 2001. Zarys parazytologii ogólnej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
• Pierce W. D., Cushman R. A., Hood C. E., 1912. The insect enemies of the cotton boll weevil. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology Bulletin 100, 1-99.
• Pojmańska T., 2002. Pasożyty jako naturalny składnik ekosystemu. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 48, 139-154.
• Pojmańska T., Chabros M., 1993. Parasites of common carp and three introduced cyprinid fishes in pond culture. Acta Parasitol. 38, 101-108.
• Poulin R., Grutter A. S., 1996. Cleaning symbioses: proximate and adaptive explanations. What evolutionary pressures led to the evolution of cleaning symbioses? BioScience 46, 512-517.
• Poulin R., Guégan J.-F., 2000. Nestedness, anti-nestedness, and the relationship of marine fish: a spacial model of species coexistence. Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 1147-1152.
• Rohde K., Worthen B. W., Heap M., Hugueny B., Guégan J.-F., 1998. Nestedness in assemblages of metazoan ecto- and endoparasites of marine fish. Int. J. Parasitol. 28, 543-549.
• Sudarikov V. E., Shigin A. A., Kudinova T. V., 1976. Vsesojuznyi simpozium po boleznjam i parazitam ryb. Tezisy dokladov. Leningrad, 64-65.
• Thomas F., Poulin R., 1998. Manipulation of molluscs by a trophically transmitted parasites: convergent evolution or phylogenetic inheritance? Parasitology 116, 431-436.
• Tompkins D. M., Begon M., 1999. Parasites can regulate wild life populations? Parasitol. Today 15, 311-313.
• Thomas F., Renaud F., De Meeus T., Poulin R., 1998. Manipulation of host behaviour by parasites : ecosystem engineering in the intertidial zone? Proc. Royal Soc. London B, 265, 1091-1096.
• Thomas F., Poulin R., De Meeus T., Guégan J.-F., Renaud F., 1999. Parasites and ecosystem engineering: what roles could they play? Oikos 84, 167-171.
• Timi J. T., Poulin R., 2007. Different methods, different results: temporal trends in the study of nested subset patterns in parasites communities. Parasitology 135, 131-138.
• Valtonen E. T., Pulkkinen R., Poulin R., Julkunen M., 2001. The structure of parasite component communities in brakish water fishes of the northeastern Baltic Sea. Parasitology 122, 471-481.
• Weiner J., 1999. Życie i ewolucja biosfery. Podręcznik ekologii ogólnej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Wiśniewski W. L., 1955. Zagadnienia biocenologiczne w parazytologii. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 1, 7-41.
• Wiśniewski W. L., 1958. Characterization of the parasitofauna of an eutrophic lake [Parasitofauna of the biocenosis of Drużno Lake - Part I]. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 6, 7-41.
• Wood J. M. 2006. Parasites entagled in food webs. Trends Parasitol. 23, 8-10.