Niebezpieczeństwa kreacjonizmu

• Authors: Jerzy Bańbura

Title variants

EN

Dangers of creationism

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

Although evolution is the most fundamental concept that unifies the entire science of biology, it has repeatably been facing challenges from creationists. While realism and methodological naturalism constitute the minimum assumptions of science, creationism rejects evolution as a natural process in favour of supernatural explanations. Modern creationism has evolved into a variety of different forms, representing a spectrum from young-earth creationism to so called intelligent-design theory. The latter was introduced as a result of conducting the "wedge strategy" of the Discovery Institute. The strategy is aimed at undermining the trust in the methodological naturalism of science, including evolution, and introducing the intelligent design theory to school curricula as an alternative concept. This form of creationism appeared in the US because of unique constitutional circumstances but, afterwards, it has dispersed all over the world, including Poland. A common feature of all forms of creationism is that they deny scientific evidence again and again. They also try to find so called gaps in knowledge and if they can not find ones, they just fabricate them. Their arguments range from extremely naive to more sophisticated, like the concept of "irreducible complexity". No form of creationism has ever produced any positive scientific research programme or any results that could be presented as scientific evidence. Consequently, having no scientific basis for their claims and yet challenging the way evolution is being thought, creationists pose a political, not scientific, threat.

• Journal: Kosmos
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 58
• Issue: 3-4
• Pages: 595-602

Dates

published

2009

Contributors

author

Jerzy Bańbura

• Katedra Zoologii Doświadczalnej i Biologii Ewolucyjnej, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Polska

References

• Balthasar U., Maidment S., 2006. Pseudoscience should not be published in Nature. Nature 444, 679-680.
• Bańbura J., 2006. Creationists pose political, not scientific, threat. Nature 444, 680.
• Behe M. J. 1996. Darwin' Black Box. Touchstone. New York.
• Behe M. J., 2007. The Edge of Evolution. Simon & Schuster, New York.
• Branch G., Scott E. C., 2009. Najnowsze oblicze kreacjonizmu. Świat Nauki 2, 80-87.
• Carroll S. B., 2006. The Making of the Fittest - DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution. W. W. Norton & Co., New York.
• Carroll S. B., 2007. God as genetic engineer. Science 316, 1427-1428.
• Chalmers A., 1993. Czym jest to co zwiemy nauką? Siedmiogród, Wrocław.
• Charlesworth B., 2006. There is no new evidence that undermines evolution. Nature 444, 680.
• De Jong G., Korthof G., 2006. Claim of bias against critics is refuted by publication. Nature 444, 679.
• Forrest B., Gross P. R., 2004. Creationism's Trojan Horse - The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Giertych M., 2001a. Ewolucja. [W:] Encyklopedia 'Białych Plam'. Tom VI, PWE, Radom, 22-34.
• Giertych M., 2001b. Ewolucjonizm. W: Encyklopedia 'Białych Plam'. Tom VI, PWE, Radom, 34-37.
• Giertych M., 2006. Creationism, evolution: nothing has been proved. Nature 444, 265.
• Hurd G. S., 2006. Walking with dinosaurs? Not in the real world. Nature 444, 680.
• Jacob F., 1973. Historia i dziedziczność. PIW, Warszawa.
• Jodkowski K., 2007. Spór ewolucjonizmu z kreacjonizmem. Megas, Warszawa.
• Kutschera U., 2006. A timely wake-up call as anti-evolutionists publicize their views. Nature 444: 679.
• Lorenc-plucińska G., 2006. Creationist views have no basis in science. 444, 679.
• Łomnicki A., 1994. Wprowadzenie. [W:] Opinia o filmie 'Ewolucja: rzeczywistość czy domniemanie'. łomnicki A. (red.). Universitas, Kraków, 9-14.
• Mayr E., 2002. To jest biologia. Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.
• Miller K. R., 1999. Finding Darwin's God. HarperCollins, New York.
• Miller K. R., 2007. Falling over the edge. Nature 447, 1055-1056.
• Miller K. R., 2008. Only a Theory - Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul. Viking, New York.
• Numbers R. L., 2006. The Creationists. Expanded Edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Pennock R. T., 2003. Creationism and intelligent design. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 4, 143-163.
• Perakh M., Young M., 2004. Is intelligent design science? [W:] Why Intelligent Design Fails. Young M., Edis T. (red.). Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, 185-196.
• Ruse M., 2001. Can a Darwinian be a Christian? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Ruse M., 2006. Darwinism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Rutkowska J., 2006. Creationists weaken society's trust in scientists. Nature 444, 679.
• Sagan D., 2008. Spór o nieredukowalną złożoność układów biochemicznych. Megas, Warszawa.
• Sarkar S., 2007. Doubting Darwin? - Creationist Designs on Evolution. Blackwell, Oxford.
• Scott E. C., 2004. Evolution vs. Creationism. University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Wilson E. O., 2009. Foreword. [W:] Evolution - The First Four Billion Years. Ruse M., Travis J. (red.). Belknap Press, Cambridge, VII-VIII.