Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2009 | 58 | 3-4 | 585-593
Article title

Etyczne konsekwencje ewolucji

Title variants
Ethical consequences of evolution
Languages of publication
Darwin's discoveries have profound ethical implications that continue to be misrepresented and/or ignored. In contrast to socialdarwinistic misuses of his theory, Darwin was a great humanitarian who paved the way for an integrated scientific and ethical world view. As an ethical doctrine, socialdarwinism is long dead ever since its defeat by E. G. Moore although the socialdarwinistic thought is a hard-die in the biological community. The accusations of sociobiology for being socialdarwinistic are unfounded and stem from the moralistic fallacy that is, a false assumption that morality is good by definition. Both social and developmental psychology demonstrate that the moral agency is a motivational device for executing reciprocity that remains at the core of any morality across all studied societies and throughout the ontogeny of moral judgment. The level of true universalizing ethical reflection (Kohlberg's postconvential stages or Gibbs's existential phase) is achieved by a small minority of humans, thus showing that Homo sapiens is a moral but not an ethical animal. While the origin of reciprocity has been perfectly explained by sociobiology, the evolutionary assembly of affective and cognitive elements that make up the moral agency is being successfully studied by the social/personality/developmental psychology as extended to non-human primates. As Darwin (1871) expected, the key innovation for the evolution of moral agency was the emergence of empathy that evolved independently at least three times: in elephants, dolphins and primates. Empathy has a motivational power of its own; it is also necessary for moral agency that requires two cognitive abilities: reflective self-consciousness and understanding of causality; the two make possible the attribution of responsibility. All these requirements are met by the chimpanzees whose moral agency operates in dyads. In contrast, the human moral agency allows for a third party intervention that opens up vast opportunities for ideologies, especially religions, to use and misuse the moral agency to enforce a reciprocation that may be harmful to both individuals and the entire group. Also, the moral agency is known to enforce enhanced intragroup cohesion and loyalty in response to conflict and war, which suggests that the two prima facie opposed human universals, morality and warfare, may have coevolved. The most important ethical consequence that follows from the increasing understanding of the primate moral agency is that every received morality is ethically flawed, none can be taken as a paragon of goodness, and each needs corrections by science-informed ethics. In fact, Darwin pioneered the integration of science and ethics, an approach that has come to be appreciated only recently under the heading of consilience.
Physical description
  • Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Polska
  • Alcock J., 2001. The Triumph of Sociobiology. Oxford University Press.
  • Alexander R. D., 1987. The Biology of Moral Systems. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
  • Ayala F., 2007/2009. Dar Karola Darwina dla nauki i religii. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
  • Baron J., 2006. Against Bioethics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Boehm C., 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest. The Evolution og Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) and London (UK).
  • Brosnan S. F., Newton-Fisher N. E., van Vugt M., 2009. A melding of minds: when primatology meets personality and social psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 13, 129-147.
  • Changeux J. P., Damasio A. R., Singer W., Christen Y. (red.), 2005. Neurobiology of Human Values. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  • Darwin K., 1859/2009. O powstawaniu gatunków. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, Warszawa.
  • Darwin C., 1863. Vermin and traps. Garderner's Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette no. 35, 821-822.
  • Darwin K., 1871/1959. O pochodzeniu człowieka. Karol Darwin/Dzieła Wybrane, Tom IV. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, Warszawa.
  • Darwin K., 1872/1959. O wyrazie uczuć u człowieka i zwierząt. Karol Darwin/Dzieła Wybrane, Tom VI. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, Warszawa.
  • Davies M. H., 1994/1999. Empatia/O umiejętności współodczuwania. Gdańskie Wyd. Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
  • Dawkins R., 2006/2008. Bóg urojony. Wyd. CiS, Warszawa.
  • Desmond A., Moore J., 2009. Darwin's Sacred Cause /How a Hatred of Slavery Shaped Darwin's Views on Human Evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston and New York.
  • de Waal F., 1996. Good Natured/The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • de Waal F., 2006. Primates and Philosophers / How Morality Evolved. Princeton University Press. Princeton, N.J.
  • Diamond J. 2005. Collapse/How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive. Penguin Books, London.
  • Douglas-Hamilton I., Bhalla S., Wittemyer G., Vollrath F., 2006. Behavioural reactions of elephants towards a dying and deceased matriarch. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100, 87-102.
  • Elżanowski A., 1993. The moral career of vertebrate values. [W:] Evolutionary Ethics. M. H. Nitecki i D. V. Nitecki (red.). State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y., 259-276.
  • Elżanowski A., 2008. Toward the scientific axiology of life. Dial. Univers. 19, 115-121.
  • Elżanowski A., 2009. Wartość życia podmiotowego z perspektywy nauki. Przegl. Filozof. (w druku).
  • Gibbs J. C., 2003. Moral Development and Reality/Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  • Gibbs J. C., Basinger K. S., Grime R. L., Snarey J. R., 2007. Moral judgment development across cultures: revisiting Kohlberg's universality claims. Develop. Rev. 27, 443-500.
  • Goodall J., 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe/Patterns of Behavior. The Belknap Press, Cambridge, Ma. and London, UK.
  • Gouldner A. W., 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Amer. Soc. Rev. 25, 161-178.
  • Greene J., Haidt J., 2002. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 517-523
  • Haidt J., 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psych. Rev. 108, 814-834.
  • Hauser M. D., 2006. Moral Minds/How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. © Marc D. Hauser (dystrybucja: HarperCollins Publishers, New York)
  • Hoffman M. L., 2000. Empathy and Moral Development/Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hume D., 1739/2005. Traktat o naturze ludzkiej. Fundacja Aletheia.
  • Kahneman D., Sunstein C. R., 2005. Cognitive Psychology of Moral Intuitions. [W:] Neurobiology of Human Values. Changeux J. P., Damasio A. R., Singer W., Christen Y. (red.). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 91-105.
  • Katz L. D. (red.), 2000. Evolutionary Origins of Morality/Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. Imprint Academic, Thorverton (UK) and Bowling Green (USA).
  • Koenigs M., Young L. Adolphs R., Tranel D., Cushman F., Hauser M., Damasio A., 2007. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446, 908-911.
  • Kohlberg L., 1976. Moral stages and moralization/The cognitive-developmental approach. [W:] Moral Development and Behavior. Lickona T. (red.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York etc., 31-53.
  • Moore E. G., 1903/1919. Zasady Etyki. M. Arct, Warszawa.
  • Nesse R. M., Lloyd A. T., 1992. The Evolution of Psychodynamic Mechanisms. [W:] The Adapted Mind/Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Barkow J. H., Cosmides L., Tooby, J. (red.). Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, 601-624.
  • Peckham M., 1959/1970. Darwinism and Darwinisticism. [W:] Darwin. Appleman P. (red.) W.W. Norton & Co., New York, 385-393. [Ekserpt z Victorian Studies, III (1959), 3-40]
  • Rachels J., 1991. Created from Animals. The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford University Press, Oxfords and New York.
  • Ricken F., 1983/2001. Etyka ogólna. Wyd. Antyk, Kęty.
  • Singer P., 2005. Ethics and intuitions. J. Ethics 9, 331-352.
  • TNS OBOP, 2006. Ewolucja po polsku. Centrum Badania Opinii Publicznej Sp. z o.o., Warszawa.
  • Trivers R., 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol. 46, 35-57.
  • Trivers R., 1985. Social Evolution. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park, Ca.
  • Uehara E., 1995. Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner's 'moral norm of reciprocity' and social support. J. Soc. Pers. Relation. 12, 483-502.
  • van Wolkenten M., Brosnan S., de Waal F. B. M., 2007. Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18854-18859.
  • Warneken F., Tomasello M., 2006. Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311, 1301-1303.
  • Westermarck E., 1912-1917. The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. 2 tomy. Wyd 2. Macmillan, London.
  • Wilson J. Q., 1993. The moral sense. Free Press, New York.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.