PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
Journal
2007 | 56 | 1-2 | 75-85
Article title

Więzi międzyosobnicze, miłość, empatia, altruizm: neurobiologiczne korzenie dobra

Content
Title variants
EN
Attachment, love, empathy, altruism: neurobiological roots of good
Languages of publication
PL EN
Abstracts
EN
The paper discusses selected examples of classical achievements and recent advances in the field of experimental analysis of neurobiological roots of phenomena involved in the formation and maintenance of friendly relationships, attraction, attachment and cooperation among animals and humans. The discussion is focused on experimental data obtained by means of a wide spectrum of modern research methods including the use of transgenic animals, neuroimaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A particular stress is laid on neurochemical basis of pair bonding and mother-young bonding, on the role of brain reward system in the phenomena of attachment, romantic love and maternal love and on complex interrelationships between social reward and reward related to drugs of abuse. Brain mechanisms underlying empathy and various forms of altruistic behaviour (including altruistic punishment) are also briefly discussed, with a particular stress laid on the role of brain reward system and cognitive processes in the control of these phenomena.
Keywords
Journal
Year
Volume
56
Issue
1-2
Pages
75-85
Physical description
Dates
published
2007
Contributors
  • Pracownia Etologii, Zakład Neurofizjologii, Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. M. Nenckiego PAN, Pasteura 3, 02-093 Warszawa, Polska
References
  • Alcock J., 2001. Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach. Wyd. 7. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • Aragona B. F., Detwiler J. M., Dietz D. M, Gobrogge K. L., Kabbaj M., Wang Z., 2005. Pair bonding decreases the reward value of abused drugs. Horm. Behav. 48, 87.
  • Aragona B. F., Liu Y, Joy Yu Y., Curtis J T., Detwiler J. M., Insel T. R., Wang Z., 2006. Nucleus accumbens dopamine differently mediates the formation and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 133-139
  • Aron A., Fisher H., Mashek D., Strong G., Li H., Brown L. L., 2005. Reward, motiwation and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 327-337.
  • Avenanti A., Bueti D., Galati G., Aglioti S. M., 2005. Transcranial magnetic stimulation highlights the sensorimotor side of empathy for pain. Nature neurosci. 8, 955-960.
  • Avenanti A., Minio-Paluello I. Bufalari I., Aglioti S. M., 2006. Stimulus-driven modulation of motor-evoked potentials during observation of others' pain. Neuroimage 32, 316-324.
  • Bartels A., Zeki S., 2000. The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport 11, 3829-3834.
  • Bartels A., Zeki S., 2004. The neural correlates of maternal and romatic love. Neuroimage 21, 1155-1166.
  • Boyd R., Gintis H., Bowles S., Richerson P. J., 2003. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3531-35235.
  • Carter C. S., 2005. Biological perspectives on social attachment and bonding. [W:] Attachment and Bonding: A New Synthesis. Dahlem Workshop Reports. Carter C. S., Ahnert L., Grossman K. E., Hrdy S. B., Lamb M. E., Porges S. W., Sachser N. (red.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Cho M. M., DeVries A. C., Williams J. R., Carter C. S., 1999. The effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on partner preferences in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behav. Neurosci. 113, 1071-1079.
  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Parker A., 1995. Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373, 209-216.
  • Curtis J. T., Liu Y., Aragona B. J., Wang Z., 2006. Dopamine and monogamy. Brain Res. 1126, 76-90.
  • D'Amato F. R., Pavone F., 1993. Endogenous opioids: a proximate reward mechanism for kin selection? Behav. Neural Biol. 60, 79-83.
  • Fehr E., Gächter S., 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137-140.
  • Fehr E., Fischbucher U., Gächter S., 2002. Strong reciprocity in human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Hum. Nat. 13, 1-25.
  • Ferris C. F., Snowdon C. T., King J. A., Duong T. Q., Ziegler T. E., Ugurbil K., Ludwig R., Schultz-Darken N. J., Wu Z., Olson D. P., Sullivan Jr J. M., Tannenbaum P. L., Vaughan J. T., 2001. Functional imaging of brain activity in conscious monkeys responding to sexually arousing cues. Neuroreport 20, 2231-2236.
  • Ferris C. F., Snowdon C. T., King J. A., Sullivan J. M. Jr., Ziegler T. E., Olson D. P., Schultz-Darken N. J., Tannenbaum P. L., Ludwig R., Wu Z., Einspanier A., Vaughan J. T., Duong T. Q., 2004. Activation of neural pathways associated with sexual arousal in non-human primates. J. Magn. Res. Imag. 19, 168-175.
  • Ferris C. F., Kulkarni P., Sullivan J. M. Jr., Harder J. A., Messenger T. L., Febo M., 2005. Pup suckling is more rewarding than cocaine: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional computational analysis. J. Neurosci. 25, 149-156.
  • Fisher H. E., Aron A., Mashek D., Li H., Brown L.L., 2002. Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction and attachment. Arch. Soc. Behav. 31, 413-429.
  • Fisher H. E., Aron A., Brown L. L., 2006. Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choice. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B London 361, 2173-2186.
  • Frith C. D., Frith U. 2006. How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Res. 1079, 36-46.
  • Gadagkar R., 2004. Genetically engineered monogamy in voles lends credence to the modus operandi of behavioural ecology. J. Genet. 83, 25-27.
  • Gardner A., West A., 2004. Cooperation and punishment, especially in humans. Am. Nat. 164, 753-764.
  • Gingrich B., Liu Y., Cascio C., Wang Z., Insel T. R., 2000. Dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens are important for social attachment in female prairie voles. Behav. Neurosci. 114, 173-183.
  • Gintis H., 2000. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. J. Theor. Biol. 206, 169-179.
  • Godzińska E. J., 2005. Ukwiały, mrówki i ludzie: biologiczne korzenie agresji i przemocy. [W:] Psychospoleczne i neurofizjologiczne aspekty agresji. Zagrodzka J., Kowaleczko-Szurmowska M. (red.). Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warszawa, 131-147.
  • Godzińska E. J., 2006. Definicja i cele poznawcze neurosocjobiologii. Kosmos 55, 137-148.
  • Hamilton W.D., 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior. Część 1 i 2. J. Theor. Biol. 7-52.
  • Insel T. R., 2003. Is social attachment an addictive disorder? Physiol. Behav. 79, 351-357.
  • Insel T. R., Young L. J., 2000. Neuropeptides and the evolution of social behavior. Curr. Opinion Neurobiol. 10, 784-789.
  • Insel T. R., Fernald R. D., 2004. How the brain processes social information: searching for the social brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 697-722.
  • Insel T. R., Wang Z. X., Ferris C. F., 1994. Patterns of brain vasopressin receptor distribution associated with social organization in microtine rodents. J. Neurosci. 14, 5381-5392.
  • Kalin N. H., Shelton S. E., Lynn D. E., 1995. Opiate systems in mother and infant primates coordinate intimate contact during reunion. Psychoneuroendocrinology 20, 735-742.
  • Keverne E. B., Martensz N. D., Tuite B., 1989. Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships. Psychoneuroendocrinology 14; 155-161.
  • Landgraf R., Frank E., Aldag J. M., Neumann I. D., Sharer C. A. Ren X., Terwilliger E. F., Niwa M., Wigger A, Young L. J., 2003. Viral vector-mediated gene transfer of the vole V1a vasopressin receptor in the rat septum: improved social discrimination and active social behavior. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 403-411.
  • Lim M. M., Wang Z., Olazábal D. E., Ren X., Terwilliger E. F., Young L. J., 2004. Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene. Nature 429, 754-757.
  • Liu Y., Wang Z. X., 2003. Nucleus accumbens oxytocin and dopamine interact to regulate pair bond formation in female prairie voles. Neuroscience 121, 537-544.
  • Lorenz K., 2004. Tak zwane zło. PIW, Warszawa.
  • Lotem A., Fishman M. A., Stone L., 1999. Evolution of cooperation between individuals. Nature 400, 226-227.
  • Lotem A., Fishman M. A., Stone L., 2002. From reciprocity to unconditional altruism through signalling benefits. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 270, 199-205.
  • Minio-Paluello I., Avenanti A., Aglioti S. M., 2006. Left hemisphere dominance in reading the sensory qualities of others' pain? Social Neurosci. 1, 320-333.
  • Moles A., Kieffer B. L., D'Amato F. R. D., 2004. Deficit in attachment behavior in mice lacking the μ-opioid receptor gene. Science 304, 1983-1986.
  • Moll J., Zahn R., de Oliveira-Souza R., Krueger F., Grafman J., 2005. The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 799-809.
  • Moll J., Krueger F., Zahn R., Pardini M., de Oliveira-Souza R., Grafman J., 2006. Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15623-15628.
  • Montague P. R., Chiu P. H., 2007. For goodness'sake. Nature Neurosci. 10, 137-138.
  • Nowak M A., 2006. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560-1563.
  • Nowak M. A., Sigmund K., 2005. Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 43, 1291-1298.
  • Panksepp J., Herman B. H., Vilberg T., Bishop P., DeEskinazi F. G., 1980. Endogenous opioids and social behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 4, 473-487.
  • Panksepp J., Jalowiec J., DeEskinazi F. G., Bishop, P., 1985. Opiates and play dominance in juvenile rats. Behav. Neurosci. 99, 441-453.
  • Pilot M., 2005. Altruism as an advertisement - a model of the evolution of cooperation based on Zahavi's handicap principle. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 17, 217-231.
  • Pitkow L. J., Sharer C. A., Ren X., Insel T R., Terwilliger E. F., Young L. J., 2001. Facilitation of affiliation and pair-bond formation by vasopressin receptor gene transfer into the ventral forebrain of a monogamous vole. J. Neurosci. 21, 7392-7396.
  • Popik P., 1996. O wpływie hormonów tylnego płata przysadki na pamięć społeczną szczurów. Kosmos 45, 291-301.
  • Quervain de D. J.-F., Fischbacher U., Treyer V., Schellhammer M., Schnyder U., Buck A., Fehr E., 2004. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254-1258.
  • Rilling J. K., Gutman D. A., Zeh T. R., Pagnoni G., Berns G. S. Kilts C. D., 2002. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 35, 395-405.
  • Rilling J. K., Sanfey A. G., Aronson J. A., Nystrom L. E., Cohen J. D., 2004. Opposing BOLD responses to reciprocated and unreciprocated altruism in putative rewardf pathways. NeuroReport 15, 2539-2543.
  • Roberts G., 1998. Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 265, 427-431.
  • Save R., Kannisher N., 2003. People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in the 'theory of mind'. Neuroimage 19, 1835-1842.
  • Seymour B., Singer T., Dolan R., 2007. The neurobiology of punishment. Nature Rev. 8, 300-311.
  • Singer T., Frith C., 2005. The painful side of empathy. Nature Neurosci. 8, 845-846.
  • Singer T., Kiebel S. J., Winston S. J., Dolan R. J., Frith C. D., 2004a. Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron 41, 653-662.
  • Singer T., Seymour B., O'Doherty J., Kaube H., Dolan R. J., Frith C. D., 2004b. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303,1157-1162.
  • Singer T., Seymour B., O'Doherty J. P., Stephan K. E., Dolan R. J., Frith C. D., 2006. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439, 466-469.
  • Tankersley D., Stowe C. J., Huettel S. A., 2007. Altruism is associated with an increase neural response to agency. Nature Neurosci. 10, 150-151.
  • Trivers R. L., 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35-57.
  • Vignemont de F., Singer T., 2006. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends Cognitive Sci. 10, 435-441.
  • Vollm B. A., Taylor A. N. W., Richardson P. C., Corcoran R., Stirling J., Mc Kie S., Deakin J. F. W., Elliot R., 2006. Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage 29, 90-98.
  • Wang Z., Yu G., Cascio C., Liu Y, Gingrich B., Insel T. R., 1999. Dopamine D2 receptot-mediated regulation of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): a mechanism for pair bonding? Behav. Neurosci. 113, 602-611.
  • Winslow J. T., Hastings N., Carter C. S., Harbaugh C. R., Insel T. R., 1993. A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles. Nature 365, 545-548.
  • Young L. J., Wang Z., 2004. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1048-1054.
  • Young L. J., Nilsen R., Waymire K. G., MacGregor G., Insel T. R., 1999. Increased affiliative response to vasopressin in mice expressing the V1a receptor from a monogamous vole. Nature 400, 766-768.
  • Zahavi A., 1995. Altruism as a handicap - the limitations of kin selection and reciprocity. J. Avian Biol. 26, 1-3.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-ksv56p75kz
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.