Specyfika zachowań eksploracyjnych oposa (Monodelphis domestica) i szczura (Rattus norvegicus) odmiany Long-Evans

• Authors: Małgorzata Węsierska

Title variants

EN

Species - specific exploratory behavior in the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) Long-Evans strain

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

Summary The Brazilian gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) is a member of Didelphidae, the oldest extant family of marsupial mammals. In the wild they are solitary, omnivorous animals feeding also on insects and small vertebrates, captured as a result of active searching and hunting behavior. They are living in the semiarid tropical part of South America. This species was introduced as a laboratory animal only in the last twenty years. Gray opossum breeds easily in laboratory conditions. Females do not have a pouch (marsupium). Pups are born after about a 14 day gestation. This is a very early stage of development, which was the main reason of introducing this species as a model of developmental research. Little is known about the behavior of wild opossums. Laboratory investigations have thus far been devoted mainly to their sexual and scent-marking behavior. This article describes the biology of the gray short-tailed opossum and laboratory investigations concerning exploratory behavior. Presented by them in the empty box test of grooming, the open field test (OF) and in the elevated plus maze test (EPM). The exploratory behavior of the opossums was compared with the behavior of Long-Evans rats. A common feature of both species was the higher level of ambulation in the peripheral part of the field than in the internal and center part of the OF, and avoidance of open arms in the EPM on the first exposition to the experimental situation. In the subsequent expositions to the experimental conditions, opossums modified patterns of the open field and the EPM exploration. In the OF their locomotor activity was shifted from peripheral part of the field to its internal and center part, in the EPM they also spent more time in the center of the maze. In the OF test opossums showed higher number of contacts with the new object than rats. In both tests rats defecated more. Although both opossums and rats showed similar exploratory repertoire in both tests, strategy of exploration employed by the opossums was different from that employed by the rats. The pattern of grooming behavior observed in opossums and rats also showed important differences. On the basis of those results we interpret the opossum's behavior in terms of a species-specific balance of fear and curiosity, different than in the case of rats.

• Journal: Kosmos
• Year: 2002
• Volume: 51
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 19-33

Dates

published

2002

Contributors

author

Małgorzata Węsierska

• Zakład Neurofizjologii Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. M. Nenckiego PAN, Pasteura 3, 02-093 Warszawa, Polska

References

• APLIN K., ARCHER M., 1987. Recent advances in marsupial systematics with a new syncretic classification. [W:] Possumms and Opossums: Studies in Evolution. M. ARCHER (red.). Surrey Beatty and Sons and Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney, 15-22.
• BERLYNE D. E., 1960. Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. McGraw-Hill. New York.
• BERRIDGE K. C., WHISHAW I. Q., 1992. Cortex, striatum and cerebellum: control of serial order in a grooming sequence. Exp. Brain Res. 90, 275-290.
• BLANCHARD R. J., FLANNELLY K. J., BLANCHARD D. C.,1986. Defensive behaviours of laboratory and wild Rattus norvegicus. J. Comp. Psychol. 100, 101-107.
• BRÜCKNER G., HÄRTIG W., SEEGER J., RÜBSAMEN R., REIMER K., BRAUER K., 1998. Cortical perineuronal nets in the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica): a distribution pattern contrasting with that shown in placental mammals. Anat. Embryol. 197, 249-262.
• BRUSH F. R., BARON S., FROEHLICH J. C., ISON J. R., PELLEGRINO L. J., PHILIPS D. S., SAKELLARIS P. C., WILLIAMS V. N., 1985. Genetic differences in avoidance learning by Rattus norvegicus: escape /avoidance responding, sensitivity to electric shock, discrimination learning, and open-field behavior. J.Comp. Psychol. 99, 60-73.
• BUCHER J., HOFFMAN R., 1980. Mammalian Species No. 140. American Society of Mammalogists.
• BURES J., FENTON A. A., 2000. Neurophysiology of spatial cognition. News Physiol. Sci. 15, 233-240.
• CABANA T., 2000. The development of mammalian motor systems: The opossums Monodelphis domestica as a model. Brain Res. Bull. 53, 615-626.
• DELIUS J. D., 1988. Preening and associated comfort behavior in birds. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 525, 428-437.
• DENENBERG V. H., 1969. Open-field behavior in the rat: what does it mean? Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 159, 852-859.
• DJAVADIAN R. L., WIELOPOLSKA E., BIALOSKORSKA K., TURLEJSKI K., 1999. Localization of the 5-HT1A receptors in the brain of opossums (Monodelphis domestica). Neuroreport 10, 3195-3200.
• DONATELLE J. M., 1977. Growth of the corticospinal tract and the development of placing reactions in the postnatal rat. J. Comp. Neur. 175, 207-232.
• FADEM B. H., CORBETT A., 1997. Sex differences and the development of social behavior in a marsupial, the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Physiol. Behav. 61, 857-861.
• FROST S. B., MASTERTON R. B., 1994. Hearing in primitive mammals: Monodelphis domestica and Marmosa elegans. Hear Res. 76, 67-72.
• HALL C. S., 1934. Emotional behavior in rats. I. Defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 18, 385-403.
• HOPE R. M., 1993. Selected features of marsupial genetics. Genetica 90, 165-80.
• IVANCO T. L., PELLIS S. M., WHISHAW I. Q., 1996. Skilled forelimb movements in prey catching and in reaching by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and opossums (Monodelphis domestica): relations to anatomical differences in motor system. Behav. Brain Res. 79, 163-181.
• JOLLES J., ROMPA-BARENDREGT J., GISPEN W. H., 1979. Novelty and grooming behavior in the rat. Behav. Neur. Biol. 25, 563-572.
• HUGHES R. N.,1968. Behaviour of male and female rats with free choice of two environments differing in novelty. Anim. Behav. 16, 92-96.
• KAVALIERS M., CHOLERIS E., 2001. Antipredator responses and defensive behavior: ecological and ethological approaches for the neurosciences. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25, 577-586.
• KIMBLE D., WHISHAW I. Q.,1994. Spatial behavior in the Brazilian short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica): comparison with the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) in the Morris water maze and radial maze. J. Comp. Psychol. 108, 148-155.
• KRAUS D., FADEM B. H., 1987. Laboratory management of the gray short-tailed opossum II: Reproduction, development and physiology. Lab. Anim. Sci. 37, 478-482.
• KUŚMIEREK P., 1998. Słyszenie i lokalizacja dźwięków przez ssaki. Kosmos 47, 359-369.
• LORENZ K. Z., 1982. The Foundations of Ethology. Simon & Schuster, New York.
• ŁUKASZEWSKA I., 1996. Eksploracja i habituacja. Kosmos 45, 375-389.
• McMANUS J. J., 1974. 'Didelphis virginiana.' Mammalian Species. The American Society of Mammalogists, 40.
• MOLNAR Z., KNOTT G. W., BLAKEMORE C., SAUNDERS N. R., 1998. Development of thalamocortical projections in the South American gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). J. Comp. Neurol. 398, 491-514.
• MONTGOMERY K. C., 1955. The relation between fear induced by novel stimulation and exploratory behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 48, 254-260.
• PFLIEGER J.-F., CASSIDY G., CABANA T., 1996. Development of spontaneous locomotor behaviors in the opossum, Monodelphis domestica. Behav. Brain Res. 80, 137-143.
• PORAN N. S., VANDOROS A., HALPERN M., 1993 a. Nuzzling in the gray short-tailed opossum I: delivery of odors to vomeronasal organ. Physiol. Behav. 53, 959-967.
• PORAN N. S., TRIPOLI R., HALPERN M., 1993 b. Nuzzling in the gray short-tailed opossum II: familiarity and individual recognition. Physiol. Behav. 53, 969-973.
• SAGVOLDEN T., HENDLEY E. D., KNARDAHL S., 1992 Behavior of hypertensive and hyperactive rat strains: hyperactivity is not unitarily determined. Physiol. Behav. 52, 49-57.
• THIESSEN D., PENDERGRASS M., YOUNG R. K., 1983. Development and expression of autogrooming in the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J. Comp. Psychol. 97, 187-190.
• VANDEBERG J. L.,1983. The gray short-tailed opossum: A new laboratory animal. ILAR News 26, 9-12.
• VON BORELL E., 1995. Neuroendocrine integration of stress and significance of stress for the performance of farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44, 219-227.
• WĘSIERSKA M., TURLEJSKI K., 2000. Spontaneous behavior of the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) in the elevated plus-maze: comparison with Long-Evans rats. Acta Neurobiol. Exp., 60, 479-487
• WĘSIERSKA M., 2000 a. Behawioralne metody oceny pamięci przestrzennej u zwierząt. Kosmos 49, 75-85.
• WĘSIERSKA M., 2000 b. Wpływ róŻnorodnych czynników na kształtowanie się pamięci przestrzennej u zwierząt. Kosmos 49, 87-96.
• WĘSIERSKA M., ZIELIŃSKI K., 1985. Extinction, reinstatement, spontaneous recovery of the conditioned suppression and stability of the conditioned inhibitor performance. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 45, 1-24.
• WIELOPOLSKA E., DJAVADIAN R., KRUBITZER L., TURLEJSKI K., 2001. Neocortical areas and their connections in the opossum Monodelphis domestica. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 61, 200.
• WILSON D. A., REEDER D. M., 1993. Mammal Species of the World, A Taxonomic and geographical Reference. Wydanie 2. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.