Open Source Implementation of Different Variants of Jiles-Atherton Model of Magnetic Hysteresis Loops

• Authors: R. Szewczyk , P. Cheng
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Jiles-Atherton model is one of the most advanced and most popular models of magnetic hysteresis loop. However, this model is considering different physical phenomena and computational issues. As a result, cross-validation of the results of modelling performed by different authors became difficult. For this reason, the open-source MATLAB/OCTAVE based implementation of Jiles-Atherton model was developed. Proposed implementation covers isotropic model of magnetic hysteresis loops as well as uniaxial and grain oriented electrical steel anisotropy. Moreover, the corrections proposed by Venkataraman together with different approaches to derivative of the anhysteretic magnetization are considered. Developed library is freely available together with the examples of magnetic hysteresis loops. As a result, it can be the base for further development of Jiles-Atherton model for better understanding of magnetization process as well as modelling the inductive components.

Keywords

EN

75.50.Bb; 75.50.Gg; 75.60.Ej

Discipline

• 75.60.Ej: Magnetization curves, hysteresis, Barkhausen and related effects(for hysteresis in ferroelectricity, see 77.80.Dj)
• 75.50.Bb: Fe and its alloys
• 75.50.Gg: Ferrimagnetics

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 133
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 654-656

Dates

published

2018-03

Contributors

author

R. Szewczyk

• Institute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, sw. A Boboli 8, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland

author

P. Cheng

• Department of Electronics Design, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden

References

• [1] D.C. Jiles, D. Atherton, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 2115 (1984), doi: 10.1063/1.333582
• [2] D. C. Jiles, A. Ramesh, Y. Shi, X. Fang, IEEE Trans. Magn. 33, 3961 (1997), doi: 10.1109/20.619629
• [3] S. Q. Antonio, M. Pompei, AEIT International Annual Conference, 2015, doi: 10.1109/AEIT.2015.7415282
• [4] K. Chwastek, Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 15, 1 (2009), doi: 10.1080/13873950802432016
• [5] D. C. Jiles, J. B. Thoelke, M. K. Devine, IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 1 (1992), doi: 10.1109/20.119813
• [6] K. Chwastek, J. Szczygłowski, Electrical Review 84, 12 (2008)
• [7] R. Biedrzycki, D. Jackiewicz, R. Szewczyk, JAMRIS 4, 63 (2014), doi: 10.14313/JAMRIS_4-2014/39
• [8] R. Szewczyk, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 267, Springer, 2014, p. 275, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05353-0_27
• [9] D. C. Jiles, D. L. Atherton, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 61, 48 (1986), doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1
• [10] A.Ramesh, D.C. Jiles, J.M. Roderick, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 4234 (1996), doi: 10.1109/20.539344
• [11] R. Szewczyk, Materials, 7, 5109 (2014), doi: 10.3390/ma7075109
• [12] A. P. S. Baghel, S. V. Kulkarni, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 043908 (2013), doi: 10.1063/1.4788806
• [13] S.E. Zirka, Y.I. Moroz, R.G. Harrison, K. Chwastek, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 043916 (2012), doi: 10.1063/1.4747915
• [14] R. Venkataraman, P.S. Krishnaprasad, Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (1998), doi: 10.1109/CDC.1998.757777

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.133.654