Scaled Soil-Structure Interaction Model for Shaking Table Testing

• Authors: F. Goktepe , A. Omid , E. Celebi
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The primarily goal of this study is to reveal a scaled soil-structure interaction model for small capacity shaking table testing instead of the full-scale field experiments. The prototype of soil-structure interaction system with frame-type building, resting on a sandy soil with shear wave velocity of 536 m/s and unit weight of 12.9 kN/m³ has been selected. For experimental investigations, the realistic site and building structures are scaled with a geometric scaling factor of 1:45. The test model, consisting of six-story steel frame-type building, natural soil and laminar soil container, is designed and constructed to realistically simulate the seismic soil-structure interaction effects of building structures in shaking table tests. In order to verify the geometric scaling factor, the dynamic properties of the fixed-base system for both prototype and scaled model are determined by using finite element analysis. Furthermore, the dynamic parameters for scaled model of a single layer soil, restricted with base-rock, have been compared numerically with the proposed laminar soil container, to provide a good agreement.

Keywords

EN

Soil-structure interaction; shaking table; finite element analysis

• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 132
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 588-590

Dates

published

2017-09

Contributors

author

F. Goktepe

• Bartin University, Department of Civil Engineering, Bartin, Turkey

author

A. Omid

• Sakarya University, Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya, Turkey

author

E. Celebi

• Sakarya University, Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya, Turkey

References

• [1] A. Daamouche, D. Fares, I. Maalem, K. Zemmouri, Acta Phys. Pol. A 130, 28 (2016), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.28
• [2] B. Nagy, Acta Phys. Pol. A 128, B-164 (2015), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-164
• [3] S.H.R. Tabatabaiefar, B. Fatahi, B. Samali, Adv. Struct. Engin. 17, 109 (2014), doi: 10.1260/1369-4332.17.1.109
• [4] H.R. Tabatabaiefar, International Journal 10, 1 (2016)
• [5] L. Cs, L. Se, Z. Mz, W. Yl, J. Struct. Engin. 11, 1732 (2006)
• [6] D.-W. Koo, H.S. Lee, Earthquake Engin. Struct. Dynam. 35, 1425 (2006), doi: 10.1002/eqe.590
• [7] T.C. Xiao, C. Jinzhe, Int. J. High-Rise Build. 1, 221 (2012)

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.132.588