Journal
Article title
Title variants
Languages of publication
Abstracts
One of the possible ways of formulation of an information loss paradox refers to an entanglement of the two particles created in a vicinity of an event horizon. Evolution of the entangled particles and an interaction with their own environments should lead to a decay of the entanglement. However obvious, such a perspective appears to be too naive in this case.
Discipline
- 03.65.Ud: Entanglement and quantum nonlocality (e.g. EPR paradox, Bell's inequalities, GHZ states, etc.)(for entanglement production and manipulation, see 03.67.Bg; for entanglement measures, witnesses etc., see 03.67.Mn; for entanglement in Bose-Einstein condensates, see 03.75.Gg)
- 04.70.Dy: Quantum aspects of black holes, evaporation, thermodynamics
Journal
Year
Volume
Issue
Pages
132-134
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-07
Contributors
author
- Department of Quantum Technologies, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland
author
- Faculty of Technology and Computer Science, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland
author
- Department of Theoretical Physics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland
References
- [1] S.W. Hawking, Nature 248, 30 (1974), doi: 10.1038/248030a0
- [2] S.W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), doi: 10.1007/BF02345020
- [3] S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460 (1976), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2460
- [4] D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743 (1993), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3743
- [5] D.N. Page, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013, 028 (2013), doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/028
- [6] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, J. Sully, J. High Energy Physics 2013, 62 (2013), doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062
- [7] D.A. Lowe, L. Thorlacius, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044012 (2013), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.044012
- [8] T. Banks, W. Fischler, arXiv: 1208.4757 http://arXiv.org/abs/1208.4757
- [9] J. Maldacena, L. Susskind, Progr. Phys. 61, 781 (2013), doi: 10.1002/prop.201300020
- [10] S. Mathur, arXiv: 1506.04342 http://arXiv.org/abs/1506.04342
- [11] G. 't Hooft, arXiv: 1511.04427 http://arXiv.org/abs/1511.04427
- [12] P. Gusin, A. Radosz, Entanglement and Information (Loss) Paradox, unpublished
- [13] M.K. Parikh, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5042 (2000), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5042
- [14] W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1683 (1982), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1683
- [15] D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1013 (1983), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1013
- [16] M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2000
- [17] W.K. Wootters, Quant. Inform. Comput. 1, 27 (2001)
- [18] E. Verlinde, H. Verlinde, arXiv: 1211.6913 http://arXiv.org/abs/1211.6913
- [19] S.W. Hawking, M. Perry, A. Strominger, PRL 116, 231301 (2016), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.231301
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-appv132n1p34kz