Disentanglement and Black Holes: Information Problem

• Authors: A. Radosz , P. Gusin , K. Roszak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

One of the possible ways of formulation of an information loss paradox refers to an entanglement of the two particles created in a vicinity of an event horizon. Evolution of the entangled particles and an interaction with their own environments should lead to a decay of the entanglement. However obvious, such a perspective appears to be too naive in this case.

Keywords

EN

04.70.Dy; 03.65.Ud

Discipline

• 03.65.Ud: Entanglement and quantum nonlocality (e.g. EPR paradox, Bell's inequalities, GHZ states, etc.)(for entanglement production and manipulation, see 03.67.Bg; for entanglement measures, witnesses etc., see 03.67.Mn; for entanglement in Bose-Einstein condensates, see 03.75.Gg)
• 04.70.Dy: Quantum aspects of black holes, evaporation, thermodynamics

• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 132
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 132-134

Dates

published

2017-07

Contributors

author

A. Radosz

• Department of Quantum Technologies, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

author

P. Gusin

• Faculty of Technology and Computer Science, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

author

K. Roszak

• Department of Theoretical Physics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

References

• [1] S.W. Hawking, Nature 248, 30 (1974), doi: 10.1038/248030a0
• [2] S.W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), doi: 10.1007/BF02345020
• [3] S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460 (1976), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2460
• [4] D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743 (1993), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3743
• [5] D.N. Page, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013, 028 (2013), doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/028
• [6] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, J. Sully, J. High Energy Physics 2013, 62 (2013), doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062
• [7] D.A. Lowe, L. Thorlacius, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044012 (2013), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.044012
• [8] T. Banks, W. Fischler, arXiv: 1208.4757 http://arXiv.org/abs/1208.4757
• [9] J. Maldacena, L. Susskind, Progr. Phys. 61, 781 (2013), doi: 10.1002/prop.201300020
• [10] S. Mathur, arXiv: 1506.04342 http://arXiv.org/abs/1506.04342
• [11] G. 't Hooft, arXiv: 1511.04427 http://arXiv.org/abs/1511.04427
• [12] P. Gusin, A. Radosz, Entanglement and Information (Loss) Paradox, unpublished
• [13] M.K. Parikh, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5042 (2000), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5042
• [14] W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1683 (1982), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1683
• [15] D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1013 (1983), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1013
• [16] M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2000
• [17] W.K. Wootters, Quant. Inform. Comput. 1, 27 (2001)
• [18] E. Verlinde, H. Verlinde, arXiv: 1211.6913 http://arXiv.org/abs/1211.6913
• [19] S.W. Hawking, M. Perry, A. Strominger, PRL 116, 231301 (2016), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.231301

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.131.132