Investigation of the Delamination Factor of Glass Sphere and Silicon Particle Reinforced (GS-SCR) Hybrid Composite Material

• Authors: M. Dundar , F. Ficici , F. Ozen , H. Unal
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Reinforced polymer composite materials have opened a new era because they can substitute the conventional metallic materials. These materials have found numerous usage areas, especially in aviation, military and space applications due to such advantages as the high tensile strength, high modulus, high corrosion resistance and low density. However, during the assembly of parts from these materials, a huge amount of holes is required. There are problems during machining of reinforced polymer composite materials. Main reason behind these problems is the inhomogeneous microstructure. Some of these problems are burr, pullout, swelling, microcrack, rapid tool wear and delamination. Among the most important of these defects is the delamination damage. Delamination is a severe drilling failure. In this work, three different cutting speeds (15, 20, 25 m/min), three different feed rates (0.05, 0.10, 0.15 mm/rev) and three different cutting tool materials (Carbide, TiN Coated HSS and HSS) have been used. Effect of different feed rates, cutting speeds and tool materials on delamination is studied by drilling of %10 glass sphere- and %10 silicon particle-reinforced polypropylene hybrid composite material.

Keywords

EN

72.80.Tm

Discipline

• 72.80.Tm: Composite materials

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 131
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 595-597

Dates

published

2017-03

Contributors

author

M. Dundar

• Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Biga Vocational School, 17200 Canakkale, Turkey

author

F. Ficici

• Sakarya University, Faculty of Technology, 54187, Sakarya, Turkey

author

F. Ozen

• Sakarya University, Faculty of Technology, 54187, Sakarya, Turkey

author

H. Unal

• Sakarya University, Faculty of Technology, 54187, Sakarya, Turkey

References

• [1] R. Melentiev, P.C. Priarone, M. Robiglio, L. Settineri, Procedia CIRP. 45, 31 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.255
• [2] H. Hocheng, C.C. Tsao, H.T. Chen, Comp. Struct. 139, 36 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.043
• [3] J. Ramkumar, S.K. Malhotra, R. Krishnamurthy, Mater. Manuf. Process 17, 213 (2002), doi: 10.1081/AMP-120003531
• [4] S. Arul, L. Vijayaraghavan, S.K. Malhotra, R. Krishnamurthy, Int. J. Mach. T. Manuf. 46, 252 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.05.023
• [5] T. Sunny, J. Babu, J. Philip, Proced. Mater. Science 6, 1131 (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.185
• [6] J.C. Rubio, A.M. Abrao, P.E. Faria, A.E. Correia, P. Davim Int. J. Mach. T. Manuf. 48, 715 (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.015
• [7] M.J.M. Ridzuan, M.S.A. Majid, M. Afendi, M.N. Mazlee, A.G. Gibson, Comp. Struct. 152, 850 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.026
• [8] K. Palanikumar, Measurement 44, 2138 (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.023
• [9] T.V. Rajamurugan, K. Shanmugan, K. Palanikumar, Mater. Des. 45, 80 (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.047
• [10] K. Palanikumar, S. Prakash, K. Shanmugam Mater. Manuf. Process 23, 858 (2008), doi: 10.1080/10426910802385026
• [11] B. Latha, V.S. Sentilkumar, J. Reinforced Plas. Comp. 28, 951 (2008), doi: 10.1177/0731684407087570
• [12] J.P. Davim, P. Reis, Comp. Structures 59, 481 (2003), doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00257-X

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.131.595