Optimization of Cutting Parameters, Condition and Geometry in Turning AISI 316L Stainless Steel Using the Grey-Based Taguchi Method

• Authors: G. Basmaci , M. Ay
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this study, experimental optimization of cutting forces, surface roughness and the hardness of material after turning of AISI 316L stainless steel, using conventional and wiper insert cutting tools under dry, CO₂ and MQL cutting conditions, is presented. The influences of feed rate, cutting depth, and cooling system on surface roughness, cutting force and material hardness were examined. In order to optimize the turning process, Grey relational analysis optimization method was used. The optimal machinability parameters of AISI 316L stainless steel with coated carbide insert were successfully determined.

Keywords

EN

81.05.-t

Discipline

• 81.05.-t: Specific materials: fabrication, treatment, testing, and analysis(for superconducting materials, see 74.70.-b, and 74.72.-h; for magnetic materials, see 75.50.-y; for optical materials, see 42.70.-a; for dielectric materials, see 77.84.-s; for disperse systems and complex fluids, see 82.70.-y; see also 82.75.-z Molecular sieves, zeolites, clathrates, and other complex solids; for materials properties, see sections 60 and 70)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 131
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 354-358

Dates

published

2017-03

Contributors

author

G. Basmaci

• Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 15030, Burdur, Turkey

author

M. Ay

• Marmara University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 34722, Istanbul, Turkey

References

• [1] T. Kosa, P. Ronald, Handbook: Machining, Vol. 16, 9th ed., 1989
• [2] R. M'Saoubi, J.C. Outeiro, B. Changeux, J.L. Lebrun, A.M. Dias, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 96, 225 (1999), doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00359-3
• [3] J.D. Darwin, D.M. Lal, G. Nagarajan, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 195, 241 (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.005
• [4] J.C. Outeiro, D. Umbrello, R. M'Saoubi, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., 46, 1786 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.11.013
• [5] B.K. Agrawal, Introduction to Engineering Materials, Mc Graw-Hill, 1983
• [6] C. Maranhao, J.P. Davim, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 18, 139 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2009.10.001
• [7] I. Korkut, M. Boy, I. Karacan, U. Seker, Mater. Design 28, 2329 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.07.009
• [8] İ. Ciftci, Tribol. Int. 39, 565 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.05.005
• [9] Ö. Tekaslan, N. Gerger, M. Günay, U. Şeker, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 13, 135 (2007) http://www.journalagent.com/pajes/pdfs/PAJES_13_2_135_144.pdf
• [10] Z. Tekiner, S. Yeşilyurt, Mater. Design 25, 507 (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.12.011
• [11] M. Kaladhar, K.V. Subbaiah, C.S. Rao, J. Engin. Sci. Technol. 8, 165 (2013) http://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Vol%208%20Issue%202%20April%2013/Volume%20(8)%20Issue%20(2)%20165-176.pdf
• [12] S. Li, Y. Liu, R. Zhu, H. Li, W. Ding, Appl. Mech. Mater. 34, 1829 (2010), doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.34-35.1829
• [13] D.P. Selvaraj, P. Chandramohan, J. Engin. Sci. Technol. 5, 293 (2010) http://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Vol%205%20Issue%203%20September%2010/Vol_5_3_293_301_DP_Selvaraj.pdf
• [14] A.E. Diniz, J.R. Ferreira, F.T. Filho, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 43, 317 (2003), doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00186-4
• [15] H.A. Kishawy, M. Dumitrescu, E.G. Ng, M.A. Elbestawi, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 45, 219 (2005), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.07.003
• [16] N.R. Dhar, M. Kamruzzaman, M. Ahmed, J. Mat. Proc. Technol. 172, 299 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.022
• [17] F. Itoigawa, T.H.C. Childs, T. Nakamura, W. Belluco, Wear 260, 339 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.03.035
• [18] N.R. Dhar, M.W. Islam, S. Islam, M.A.H. Mithu, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 171, 93 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.047
• [19] E.O. Ezugwu, J. Bonney, R.B. Da Silva, O. Çakir, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 47, 884 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.08.005
• [20] A. Attanasio, M. Gelfi, C. Giardini, C. Remino, Wear 260, 333 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.04.024
• [21] C. Bruni, A. Forcellese, F. Gabrielli, M. Simoncini, Int. J. Machine Tools Manufact. 46, 1547 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.09.007
• [22] K. Venkatesan, R. Ramanujam, V. Saxena, N. Chawdhury, V. Choudhary, J. Engin. Appl. Sci. 9, 250 (2014) http://arpnjournals.com/jeas/research_papers/rp_2014/jeas_0314_1023.pdf
• [23] J. Liu, R. Han, Y. Sun, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 45, 687 (2005), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.022
• [24] M. Stanford, P.M. Lister, C. Morgan, K.A. Kibble, J. Mat. Proc. Technol. 209, 961 (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.003
• [25] P.J. Ross, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering, 1996
• [26] N. Tosun, Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol. 28, 450 (2006), doi: 10.1007/s00170-004-2386-y
• [27] İ. Asiltürk, S. Neşeli, Measurement 45, 785 (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.12.004
• [28] M. Kurt, S. Hartomacioğlu, B. Mutlu, U. Köklü, Mater. Technol. 46, 205 (2012) http://mit.imt.si/Revija/izvodi/mit123/kurt.pdf

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.131.354