Optimisation of Machining Parameters in Turning AISI 304L Stainless Steel by the Grey-Based Taguchi Method

• Authors: M. Ay
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this study, an experimental optimization of cutting forces and surface roughness in turning of AISI 304L stainless steel using wiper and conventional insert cutting tools with dry cutting conditions are presented. The influences of feed rate, depth of cut, and corner radius on surface roughness, cutting force and surface hardness are examined. In order to optimize the turning process, Grey relational analysis optimization method is used. The optimal machinability conditions of AISI 304L stainless steel with coated carbide insert are successfully determined in this study.

Keywords

EN

81.05.-t

Discipline

• 81.05.-t: Specific materials: fabrication, treatment, testing, and analysis(for superconducting materials, see 74.70.-b, and 74.72.-h; for magnetic materials, see 75.50.-y; for optical materials, see 42.70.-a; for dielectric materials, see 77.84.-s; for disperse systems and complex fluids, see 82.70.-y; see also 82.75.-z Molecular sieves, zeolites, clathrates, and other complex solids; for materials properties, see sections 60 and 70)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 131
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 349-353

Dates

published

2017-03

Contributors

author

M. Ay

• Marmara University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 34722, Istanbul, Turkey

References

• [1] M.C. Shaw, Metal cutting principles, Oxford University Press, 1984
• [2] M.C. Cakır, Modern Machining Methods, VIPAS A.S., 2000, p. 349
• [3] A. Kurt, Ph.D. Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, 2006
• [4] W.S. Lin, B.Y. Lee, C.L. Wu, Int. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 108, 286 (2001), doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00835-9
• [5] W. Stachurski, B. Kruszynski, S. Midera, Mech. Mech. Engin. 16, 25 (2012) http://www.kdm.p.lodz.pl/articles/2012/3_S_K_M1.pdf
• [6] H. Saglam, S. Yaldiz, F. Unsacar, Mater. Design 28, 101 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.05.015
• [7] H. Gokkaya, M. Nalbant, Electr. J. Mach. Technol. 2, 33 (2006) http://teknolojikarastirmalar.com/pdf/tr/01_030206_5_nalbant_tr.pdf
• [8] M. Field, J.F. Kahles, W.P. Koster, Metals Handbook-Machining-16, 9th ed., ASM International Materials, Park-Ohio 1989, p. 19
• [9] A.S. Kumar, A.R. Durai, T. Sornakumar, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 173, 151 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.012
• [10] M.Y. Noordin, V.C. Venkatesh, S. Sharif, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 185, 83 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.137
• [11] I. Korkut, M. Kasap, I. Çiftçi, U. Şeker, Mater. Design 25, 300 (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.011
• [12] M.Y. Noordin, D. Kurniawan, S. Sharif, Int. J. Prec. Technol. 1, 75 (2007), doi: 10.1504/IJPTECH.2007.015346
• [13] I.S. Jawahir, E. Brinksmeier, R. M'Saoubi, D.K. Aspinwall, J.C. Outeiro, D. Meyer, D. Umbrello, A.D. Jayal, CIRP Ann.-Manufact. Technol. 60, 603 (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002
• [14] M. Elbah, M.A. Yallese, H. Aouici, T. Mabrouki, J.-F. Rigal, Measurement 46, 3041 (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.018
• [15] W. Grzesik, T. Wanat, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufac. 46, 1988 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.009
• [16] W.H. Yang, Y.S. Tarng, Int. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 84, 122 (1998), doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00079-X
• [17] K. Venkatesan, R. Ramanujam, V. Saxena, N. Chawdhury, V. Choudhary, J. Engin. Appl. Sci. 9, 250 (2014) http://www.arpnjournals.com/jeas/research_papers/rp_2014/jeas_0314_1023.pdf
• [18] M. Kurt, S. Hartomacioğlu, B. Mutlu, U. Köklü, Mater. Technol. 46, 205 (2012) http://mit.imt.si/Revija/izvodi/mit123/kurt.pdf

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.131.349