Optimisation of Machining Parameters in Turning AISI 304L Stainless Steel by the Grey-Based Taguchi Method

• Authors: M. Ay
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this study, an experimental optimization of cutting forces and surface roughness in turning of AISI 304L stainless steel using wiper and conventional insert cutting tools with dry cutting conditions are presented. The influences of feed rate, depth of cut, and corner radius on surface roughness, cutting force and surface hardness are examined. In order to optimize the turning process, Grey relational analysis optimization method is used. The optimal machinability conditions of AISI 304L stainless steel with coated carbide insert are successfully determined in this study.

Keywords

EN

81.05.-t  

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 131
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 349-353

Dates

published

2017-03

References

• [1] M.C. Shaw, Metal cutting principles, Oxford University Press, 1984
• [2] M.C. Cakır, Modern Machining Methods, VIPAS A.S., 2000, p. 349
• [3] A. Kurt, Ph.D. Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, 2006
• [4] W.S. Lin, B.Y. Lee, C.L. Wu, Int. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 108, 286 (2001), doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00835-9
• [5] W. Stachurski, B. Kruszynski, S. Midera, Mech. Mech. Engin. 16, 25 (2012) http://www.kdm.p.lodz.pl/articles/2012/3_S_K_M1.pdf
• [6] H. Saglam, S. Yaldiz, F. Unsacar, Mater. Design 28, 101 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.05.015
• [7] H. Gokkaya, M. Nalbant, Electr. J. Mach. Technol. 2, 33 (2006) http://teknolojikarastirmalar.com/pdf/tr/01_030206_5_nalbant_tr.pdf
• [8] M. Field, J.F. Kahles, W.P. Koster, Metals Handbook-Machining-16, 9th ed., ASM International Materials, Park-Ohio 1989, p. 19
• [9] A.S. Kumar, A.R. Durai, T. Sornakumar, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 173, 151 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.012
• [10] M.Y. Noordin, V.C. Venkatesh, S. Sharif, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 185, 83 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.137
• [11] I. Korkut, M. Kasap, I. Çiftçi, U. Şeker, Mater. Design 25, 300 (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.011
• [12] M.Y. Noordin, D. Kurniawan, S. Sharif, Int. J. Prec. Technol. 1, 75 (2007), doi: 10.1504/IJPTECH.2007.015346
• [13] I.S. Jawahir, E. Brinksmeier, R. M'Saoubi, D.K. Aspinwall, J.C. Outeiro, D. Meyer, D. Umbrello, A.D. Jayal, CIRP Ann.-Manufact. Technol. 60, 603 (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002
• [14] M. Elbah, M.A. Yallese, H. Aouici, T. Mabrouki, J.-F. Rigal, Measurement 46, 3041 (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.018
• [15] W. Grzesik, T. Wanat, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufac. 46, 1988 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.009
• [16] W.H. Yang, Y.S. Tarng, Int. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 84, 122 (1998), doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00079-X
• [17] K. Venkatesan, R. Ramanujam, V. Saxena, N. Chawdhury, V. Choudhary, J. Engin. Appl. Sci. 9, 250 (2014) http://www.arpnjournals.com/jeas/research_papers/rp_2014/jeas_0314_1023.pdf
• [18] M. Kurt, S. Hartomacioğlu, B. Mutlu, U. Köklü, Mater. Technol. 46, 205 (2012) http://mit.imt.si/Revija/izvodi/mit123/kurt.pdf

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.131.349