Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 130 | 4 | 886-888
Article title

Asymmetry of 1 nm XRD Reflection and Measurement of Illite Crystallinity

Title variants
Languages of publication
Theoretically the X-ray emission is subjected to the Gaussian distribution and is symmetric. An X-ray diffraction peak should be symmetric, too. However all illite 1 nm (interplanar distance) peaks used for measurement of illite crystallinity (IC) are practically asymmetric. Our experimental results prove that any X-ray diffraction peak in low diffraction angle segment appears asymmetric if the diffractometer is running with a slit-fixed system. However, if the diffractometer is running with an auto-adjustable-slit system and the illumination length is fixed, the X-ray diffraction peak in low diffraction angle segment is symmetric. Those peaks derived from synchrotron radiation are symmetric in all angle ranges. The asymmetric degree (AsD) of a X-ray diffraction peak is subjected to the ratio of integrated intensities on lower and higher diffraction angle sides which are related to the X-ray illuminating length (area) on the sample. From the expression of illuminating length it is derived that with increasing diffraction angle the illuminating length decreases and therefore a X-ray diffraction peak is always asymmetric. The relationship between AsD and IC can be expressed as AsD = 0.239IC + 0.999, When illite/smectite mixed-layer phase presents the asymmetry of the illite 1 nm X-ray diffraction peak will be obviously higher than usual case and induces unusually larger IC value.
Physical description
  • [1] W.B. Stern, J. Mullis, M. Rahn, M. Frey, Schweiz. Miner. Petrogr. Mitt. 71, 453 (1991)
  • [2] B. Lanson, D. Champion, Am. J. Sci. 29l, 473 (1991), doi: 10.2475/ajs.291.5.473
  • [3] H.J. Kisch, J. Metamorphic. Geol. 9, 665 (1991), doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1991.tb00556.x
  • [4] D.M. Moore, Jr., R.C. Reynolds, in: Quantitative Analysis, 2nd ed., Eds. D.M. Moore Jr., R.C. Reynolds, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1997, p. 102
  • [5] H. Wang, J. Zhou, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 33, 1128 (2000), doi: 10.1107/S0021889800006932
  • [6] H. Wang, J. Zhou, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 38, 830 (2005), doi: 10.1107/S0021889805024490
  • [7] W. Ruland, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1, 90 (1968), doi: 10.1107/S0021889868005066
  • [8] R.K. Nandi, S.P. Sen Gupta, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 11, 6 (1978), doi: 10.1107/S0021889878012595
  • [9] L. Alexander, J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1068 (1948), doi: 10.1063/1.1698013
  • [10] R.T. Bragg, J.B. Aladekomo, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 14 (1995), doi: 10.1107/S0021889894006333
  • [11] M.A.G. Aranda, E.R. Losilla, A. Cabeza, S. Bruque, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 31, 16 (1998), doi: 10.1107/S0021889897006419
  • [12] O. Masson, R. Guinebretiere, A. Dauger, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 29, 540 (1996), doi: 10.1107/S0021889896004839
  • [13] L.N. Warr, A.H.N. Rice, J. Metamorph. Geol. 12, 141 (1994), doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1994.tb00010.x
  • [14] W.N. Schreiner, Powder Diffr. 1, 26 (1986), doi: 10.1017/S0885715600011258
  • [15] E. Ferrage, C.A. Kirk, G. Cressey, J. Cuadros, Am. Miner. 92, 994 (2007), doi: 10.2138/am.2007.2396
  • [16] H.A. Liebhafsky, H.G. Pfeiffer, P.D. Zemany, Anal. Chem. 27, 1257 (1955), doi: 10.1021/ac60104a014
  • [17] Y. Beers, Introduction to the Theory of Error, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Boston 1957, p. 46
  • [18] M. Slaughter, in: Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Applications to Environmental and Occupational Health Analysis, Ed. P.A. Russell, Ann Arbor Science, Michigan 1981, Vol. 2, p. 77
  • [19] L. Alexander, J. Appl. Phys. 25, 155 (1954), doi: 10.1063/1.1721595
  • [20] H.P. Klug, L.E. Alexander, X-ray Diffraction Procedures, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York 1974, p. 291
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.