The Diamond Model of Social Response within an Agent-Based Approach

• Authors: P. Nail , K. Sznajd-Weron
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Models of social response concern the identification and delineation of possible responses to social pressure. Most models are based on simple one-dimensional conceptualizations of conformity and its alternatives even though more sophisticated models have been available for a number of years. The diamond model is perhaps the most refined of the two-dimensional formulations. It is particularly useful in building agent-based models of opinion dynamics because it gives clear and explicit operational definitions of basic types of social response. In fact, the diamond model is actually a ready recipe for a microscopic model of opinion dynamics. Moreover, it fits quite well Einstein's simple but no simpler strategy. In this work, we will present the logic of the diamond model as well as its implications for agent-based modeling.

Keywords

EN

87.23.Ge; 05.50.+q

Discipline

• 87.23.Ge: Dynamics of social systems
• 05.50.+q: Lattice theory and statistics (Ising, Potts, etc.)(see also 64.60.Cn Order-disorder transformations, and 75.10.Hk Classical spin models)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 129
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 1050-1054

Dates

published

2016-05

Contributors

author

P. Nail

• Department of Psychology and Counseling, University of Central Arkansas, USA

author

K. Sznajd-Weron

• Department of Theoretical Physics, Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław, Poland

References

• [1] A. Calaprice, The Ultimate Quotable Einstein, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 2010, p. 384
• [2] S. Galam, J. Math. Psychol. 30, 426 (1986), doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90019-2
• [3] M. Lewenstein, A. Nowak, B. Latané, Phys. Rev. A 45, 763 (1992), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.763
• [4] K. Kacperski, J.A. Holyst, J. Statist. Phys. 84, 169 (1996), doi: 10.1007/BF02179581
• [5] J.A. Hołyst, K. Kacperski, F. Schweitzer, Physica A 285, 199 (2000), doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00282-X
• [6] G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuchr, Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87 (2000), doi: 10.1142/S0219525900000078
• [7] P. Sobkowicz, J. Artific. Soc. Soc. Simul. 12, 11 (2009) http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/11.html
• [8] K. Kulakowski, Physica A 388, 469 (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.10.037
• [9] P. Sobkowicz, PloS ONE 7, e44489 (2012), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044489
• [10] P. Gawronski, M. Nawojczyk, K. Kulakowski, Acta Phys. Pol. A 127, A-45 (2015), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.127.a-45
• [11] C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009), doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591
• [12] S. Galam, Sociophysics: A Physicist's Modeling of Psycho-political Phenomena, Springer, New Zork 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2032-3
• [13] P. Nyczka, K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Statist. Phys. 151, 174 (2013), doi: 10.1007/s10955-013-0701-4
• [14] P. Sen, B.K. Chakrabarti, Sociophysics: An Introduction, 1st ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014
• [15] P.R. Nail, S.I. Di Domenico, G. MacDonald, Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17, 1 (2013), doi: 10.1037/a0030997
• [16] R.H. Willis, Human Relat. 18, 373 (1965), doi: 10.1177/001872676501800406
• [17] P.R. Nail, M.D. Van Leeuwen, Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 19, 106 (1993), doi: 10.1177/0146167293191012
• [18] P.R. Nail, K. Sznajd-Weron, to be published in: The Psychology of Social Influence: Theory, Techniques and Research, Ed. D. Howard, Nova Science Publishers, New York 2016
• [19] C. Castellano, M.A. Munoz, R. Pastor-Satorras, Phys. Rev. E 80, 041129 (2009), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.041129
• [20] P. Nyczka, K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Cislo, Phys. Rev. E 86, 011105 (2012), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.011105
• [21] P. Moretti, S. Liu, C. Castellano, R. Pastor-Satorras, J. Statist. Phys. 151, 113 (2013), doi: 10.1007/s10955-013-0704-1
• [22] M. Mobilia, Phys. Rev. E 92, 012803 (2015), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012803
• [23] M.A. Javarone, T. Squartini, J. Statist. Mech. 10, P10002 (2015), doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2015/10/P10002
• [24] A.M. Timpanaro, S. Galam, Phys. Rev. E 92, 012807 (2015), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012807
• [25] A. Chmiel, K. Sznajd-Weron, Phys. Rev. E 92, 052812 (2015), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052812
• [26] K. Maciejowska, A. Jędrzejewski, A. Kowalska-Pyzalska, R. Weron, Acta Phys. Pol. A 129, 1045 (2016), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.129.1045
• [27] R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, R.F. Krueger, Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology http://guilford.com/books/Handbook-of-Research-Methods-in-Personality-Psychology/Robins-Fraley-Krueger/9781606236123
• [28] A. Jędrzejewski, K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Szwabiński, Physica A 446, 110 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.11.005
• [29] K. Sznajd-Weron, M. Tabiszewski, A. Timpanaro, Euro Phys. Lett. 96, 48002 (2011), doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/96/48002

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.129.1050