Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 129 | 4 | 770-772

Article title

Determination of the Tenth and Half Value Layer Thickness of Concretes with Different Densities

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Half value layer (HVL) is the most frequently used quantitative factor for describing both the penetrating ability of specific radiations and the penetration through specific objects. The half value layers (HVL) and tenth value layers (TVL) are defined as the thickness of a shield or an absorber that reduces the radiation level by a factor of one-half and one tenth of the initial level, respectively. The concepts of HVL and TVL are widely used in shielding design. They are photon energy dependent, like the attenuation coefficient. HVL and TVL values provide useful information about the penetration of a specific radiation in a specific material. In this study, TVL and HVL thickness are calculated for concretes with different densities. For this purpose five types of concrete with different density ranges were selected, with densities between 600-1500 kg/m^{3}, called lightweight concrete, 1400-2000 kg/m^{3}, called semi lightweight concrete, 2000-2500 kg/m^{3} called ordinary concrete, 2500-3000 kg/m^{3}, semi heavyweight concrete and 3000-4000 kg/m^{3} called heavyweight concrete, respectively. For evaluated TVL and HVL thicknesses, the linear attenuation coefficients μ, were determined from measurements, using a collimated beam of gamma rays from a Cobalt-60 source.

Keywords

EN

Contributors

author
  • Suleyman Demirel University Technology, Faculty Civil Engineering, 32260 Isparta, Turkey

References

  • [1] S. Vallabhajosula, Molecular Imaging: Radiopharmaceuticals for PET and SPECT, Springer Science & Business Media, 2009, p. 392
  • [2] NCRP Radiation Protection in Educational Institutions, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, Report No. 157 (2007)
  • [3] F.A. Ikraiam, A. Abd El-Latif, A. Abd El-Azziz, J.M. Ali, Arab J. Nucl. Sci. Appl. 42, 287 (2009)
  • [4] I. Akkurt, C. Basyigit, A. Akkaş, S. Kılınçarslan, B. Mavi, K. Günoglu, Acta Phys. Pol. A 121, 138 (2012), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.121.138
  • [5] P. Sprawls, The Physical Principles of Medical Imaging, 2nd ed., Aspen Publication, NY, USA, 1993
  • [6] I. Akkurt, K. Günoglu, C. Basyigit, A. Akkaş, Acta Phys. Pol. A 123, 374 (2013), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.128.374
  • [7] I. Akkurt, H. Akyıldırım, B. Mavi, S. Kılınçarslan, C. Basyigit, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37, 910 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2010.04.001
  • [8] A. Martin, S. Harbison, K. Beach, P. Cole, An Introduction to Radiation Protection 6E, CRC Press. Medical, 2012, p. 256
  • [9] C. Basyigit, V. Uysal, S. Kılınçarslan, B. Mavi, K. Gunoğlu, I. Akkurt, A Akkaş, AIP Conf. Proc. 1400, 232 (2012), doi: 10.1063/1.3663119
  • [10] J.P. Biggs, Radiation Shielding for Megavolt-age Photon Therapy Machines 52nd Annual Meeting, AAPM, Philadelphia, 2010, p. 5
  • [11] P.O. López, G. Rajan, E.B. Podgorsak, Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students, Chapter 16: Radiation Protection and Safety in Radiotherapy, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005, p. 600
  • [12] Sh. Sharifi, R. Bagheri, S.P. Shirmardi, Ann. Nucl. Energy 53, 529 (2013), doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2012.09.015
  • [13] P. Papagiannis, D. Baltas, D. Granero, J. Pérez-Calatayud, J. Gimeno, F. Ballester, J.L.M. Venselaar, Med. Phys. 35, 4898 (2008), doi: 10.1118/1.2986153

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-appv129n4090kz
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.