Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 129 | 4 | 625-627
Article title

Estimation of Surface Modification Methods Effect on the Topography of Dental Implants by Using Metrological Observation Techniques

Title variants
Languages of publication
Over the last few decades the use of dental implants has been increasing everyday as a solution for partial or full edentulism. The osseointegration process has to be fully completed to reach a prosthetic phase, so that patient can start to use the dental implants functionally. One of the most important factors affecting osseointegration is the surface properties of dental implants. Surface roughness of dental implant is vital to increase bone anchoring and maintain the biomechanical stability. In addition to successful application of dental implants, rapid osseointegration has also been desired as a favorable situation. It is demonstrated that there is a strong correlation between the successful application and rapid osseointegration of dental implants and the surface morphology and characteristics of dental implants. From this point of view, investigation of the surface morphology of implants has a vital importance for manufacturers. The aim of our study was to evaluate the surface topography and homogeneity of dental implants with different surface modifications by means of 2D and 3D observation methods.
Physical description
  • Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Istanbul Aydin University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 34088 Florya, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw, Poland
  • [1] R. Liu, T. Lei, V. Dusevich, X. Yao, Y. Liu, M.P. Walker, Y. Wang, L. Ye, J. Prosthodont. 22, 641 (2013), doi: 10.1111/jopr.12063
  • [2] P.I. Brĺnemark, B.O. Hansson, R Adell, U. Breine, J.J. Lindström, O. Hallén, A. Ohman, Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Suppl. 16, 1 (1977)
  • [3] T. Albrektsson, P.I. Branemark, H.A. Hansson, J. Lindstrom, Acta Orthop. Scand. 52, 155 (1981), doi: 10.3109/17453678108991776
  • [4] L. Le Guéhennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, Y. Amouriq, Dent. Mater. 23, 844 (2007), doi: 10.1016/
  • [5] Y.T. Sul, B.S. Kang, C. Johansson, H.S. Um, C.J. Park, T. Albrektsson, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 89A, 942 (2008), doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32041
  • [6] T. Jarmar, A. Palmquist, R. Brånemark, L. Hermansson, H. Engqvist, P. Thomsen, Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 10, 11 (2008), doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00056.x
  • [7] A. Wennerberg, C. Hallgren, C. Johansson, S. Danelli, Clin. Oral Implants Res. 9, 11 (1998), doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090102.x
  • [8] A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, B. Albrektsson, J.J. Krol, Clin. Oral Implant Res. 6, 24 (1995), doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
  • [9] M.B. Rosa, T. Albrektsson, C.E. Francischone, H.O.S. Filho, A. Wennerberg, J. Appl. Oral Sci. 20, 550 (2012), doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000500010
  • [10] M.M. Shalabi, A. Gortemaker, M.A.V. Hof, J.A. Jansen, N.H. Creugers, J. Dent. Res. 85, 496 (2006), doi: 10.1177/154405910608500603
  • [11] K. Vandamme, I. Naert, J. Vander Sloten, R. Puers, J. Duyck, J. Periodontol. 79, 150 (2008), doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.060413
  • [12] A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 15, 331 (2000)
  • [13] A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 172 (2009), doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x
  • [14] C. Aparicio, A. Padrós, F.-J. Gil, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 4, 1672 (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.005
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.