Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Mixed Adhesive Bonded Joints under In-Plane Shear Loading

• Authors: M. Uysal
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The main objective of this work is to evaluate the buckling capacity of a mixed adhesively lab joint panel when subjected to in-plane shear loading. In the plate joints, two types of adhesive were used in the overlap region and the stiff adhesive was located in the middle. This technique proposes to modify the mechanical properties of adhesive along the overlap. The adherents used in the investigation are made up from homogeneous isotropic material and laminated composite. Three-dimensional finite element models were developed for mixed adhesively bonded isotropic and orthotropic panel pairs. Linear finite element models have been developed to understand how variable modulus bond line affected the buckling loads. Finite element analyses were performed to predict buckling loads for different adhesive Young's modulus ratios and different adherent material types in the first five modes.

Keywords

EN

62.20.mq

Discipline

• 62.20.mq: Buckling

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 129
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 448-450

Dates

published

2016-04

Contributors

author

M. Uysal

• Yildiz Technical University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 34349 Istanbul, Turkey

References

• [1] S. Semerdjiev, Metal to Metal Adhesive Bonding, Business Books Ltd, UK 1970
• [2] R.L. Patrick, Treatise on Adhesion and Adhesive-Structural Adhesives with Emphasis on Aerospace Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York 1976
• [3] E.A.S. Marques, L.F.M. da Silva, J. Adhesion 84, 917 (2008), doi: 10.1080/00218460802505275
• [4] P.J.C. das Neves, L.F.M. da Silva, R.D. Adams, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 23, 1 (2009), doi: 10.1163/156856108X336026
• [5] L.F.M. da Silva, R.D. Adams, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 27, 216 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.002
• [6] L.F.M. da Silva, M.J.C.Q. Lopes, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 29, 509 (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.009
• [7] M.D. Fitton, J.G. Broughton, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 25, 329 (2005), doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.08.002
• [8] H. Kim, K.T. Kedward, J. Adhesion 76, 1 (2001), doi: 10.1080/00218460108029615
• [9] D. Mocibob, M. Crisinel, in: Proc. Challenging Glass: Conference on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass, Eds.: F. Bos, Ch. Louter, F. Veer, IOS Press, Delf 2007, p. 253
• [10] M.U. Uysal, U. Güven, Compos. Struct. 121, 182 (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.012
• [11] O.E. Canyurt, C. Meram, M. Uslu, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 30, 281 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.09.005

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.129.448